Comparison of bimanual examination with ultrasound examination before hysterectomy for uterine leiomyoma

Guilherme H C Cantuaria, Roberto Angioli, Leslie Frost, Robert Duncan, Manuel A. Penalver

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

48 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To correlate the preoperative bimanual examination with ultrasound examination with regard to estimating the size of enlarged nongravid leiomyomatous uteri. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of 161 patients who underwent hysterectomy for uterine leiomyoma between January 1994 and December 1994 and between July 1995 and April 1996. Uterine size was estimated clinically by bimanual examination. Ultrasound reports were reviewed. Uterine weights and dimensions in pathology reports were compared with findings on bimanual examination and ultrasonography. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated and patients were divided into two groups, one with BMIs of more than 30 and another with BMIs of less than or equal to 30. Results: Ultrasound examination was ordered in 111 patients (68.9%) preoperatively. There was a strong correlation between the bimanual examination findings and the ultrasound dimensions. The equation for this relationship is ultrasound length (cm) = 3.68 + 0.68 x number of weeks (r = .78, P < .001). Ultrasound length also was related strongly to size given in the pathologic reports; the equation for this relationship is ultrasound length (cm) = 2.94 + 0.75 x pathology length (cm) (r = .73, P < .001). The correlation between bimanual examination and ultrasound findings was similar in obese and in nonobese patients, when uterine size could be estimated. Conclusion: There is a strong correlation between bimanual and ultrasound examinations with regard to determining the size of leiomyomatous uteri. Routine ultrasound is not indicated when an experienced examiner can assess uterine size. Ultrasonography may be appropriate when physical assessment is difficult, as in the case of obesity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)109-112
Number of pages4
JournalObstetrics and Gynecology
Volume92
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Leiomyoma
Hysterectomy
Uterus
Ultrasonography
Pathology
Body Mass Index
Obesity
Weights and Measures

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Comparison of bimanual examination with ultrasound examination before hysterectomy for uterine leiomyoma. / Cantuaria, Guilherme H C; Angioli, Roberto; Frost, Leslie; Duncan, Robert; Penalver, Manuel A.

In: Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 92, No. 1, 01.07.1998, p. 109-112.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cantuaria, Guilherme H C ; Angioli, Roberto ; Frost, Leslie ; Duncan, Robert ; Penalver, Manuel A. / Comparison of bimanual examination with ultrasound examination before hysterectomy for uterine leiomyoma. In: Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1998 ; Vol. 92, No. 1. pp. 109-112.
@article{16d9ddfb35e84de89b7f90385525a43f,
title = "Comparison of bimanual examination with ultrasound examination before hysterectomy for uterine leiomyoma",
abstract = "Objective: To correlate the preoperative bimanual examination with ultrasound examination with regard to estimating the size of enlarged nongravid leiomyomatous uteri. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of 161 patients who underwent hysterectomy for uterine leiomyoma between January 1994 and December 1994 and between July 1995 and April 1996. Uterine size was estimated clinically by bimanual examination. Ultrasound reports were reviewed. Uterine weights and dimensions in pathology reports were compared with findings on bimanual examination and ultrasonography. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated and patients were divided into two groups, one with BMIs of more than 30 and another with BMIs of less than or equal to 30. Results: Ultrasound examination was ordered in 111 patients (68.9{\%}) preoperatively. There was a strong correlation between the bimanual examination findings and the ultrasound dimensions. The equation for this relationship is ultrasound length (cm) = 3.68 + 0.68 x number of weeks (r = .78, P < .001). Ultrasound length also was related strongly to size given in the pathologic reports; the equation for this relationship is ultrasound length (cm) = 2.94 + 0.75 x pathology length (cm) (r = .73, P < .001). The correlation between bimanual examination and ultrasound findings was similar in obese and in nonobese patients, when uterine size could be estimated. Conclusion: There is a strong correlation between bimanual and ultrasound examinations with regard to determining the size of leiomyomatous uteri. Routine ultrasound is not indicated when an experienced examiner can assess uterine size. Ultrasonography may be appropriate when physical assessment is difficult, as in the case of obesity.",
author = "Cantuaria, {Guilherme H C} and Roberto Angioli and Leslie Frost and Robert Duncan and Penalver, {Manuel A.}",
year = "1998",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0029-7844(98)00131-8",
language = "English",
volume = "92",
pages = "109--112",
journal = "Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0029-7844",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of bimanual examination with ultrasound examination before hysterectomy for uterine leiomyoma

AU - Cantuaria, Guilherme H C

AU - Angioli, Roberto

AU - Frost, Leslie

AU - Duncan, Robert

AU - Penalver, Manuel A.

PY - 1998/7/1

Y1 - 1998/7/1

N2 - Objective: To correlate the preoperative bimanual examination with ultrasound examination with regard to estimating the size of enlarged nongravid leiomyomatous uteri. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of 161 patients who underwent hysterectomy for uterine leiomyoma between January 1994 and December 1994 and between July 1995 and April 1996. Uterine size was estimated clinically by bimanual examination. Ultrasound reports were reviewed. Uterine weights and dimensions in pathology reports were compared with findings on bimanual examination and ultrasonography. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated and patients were divided into two groups, one with BMIs of more than 30 and another with BMIs of less than or equal to 30. Results: Ultrasound examination was ordered in 111 patients (68.9%) preoperatively. There was a strong correlation between the bimanual examination findings and the ultrasound dimensions. The equation for this relationship is ultrasound length (cm) = 3.68 + 0.68 x number of weeks (r = .78, P < .001). Ultrasound length also was related strongly to size given in the pathologic reports; the equation for this relationship is ultrasound length (cm) = 2.94 + 0.75 x pathology length (cm) (r = .73, P < .001). The correlation between bimanual examination and ultrasound findings was similar in obese and in nonobese patients, when uterine size could be estimated. Conclusion: There is a strong correlation between bimanual and ultrasound examinations with regard to determining the size of leiomyomatous uteri. Routine ultrasound is not indicated when an experienced examiner can assess uterine size. Ultrasonography may be appropriate when physical assessment is difficult, as in the case of obesity.

AB - Objective: To correlate the preoperative bimanual examination with ultrasound examination with regard to estimating the size of enlarged nongravid leiomyomatous uteri. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of 161 patients who underwent hysterectomy for uterine leiomyoma between January 1994 and December 1994 and between July 1995 and April 1996. Uterine size was estimated clinically by bimanual examination. Ultrasound reports were reviewed. Uterine weights and dimensions in pathology reports were compared with findings on bimanual examination and ultrasonography. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated and patients were divided into two groups, one with BMIs of more than 30 and another with BMIs of less than or equal to 30. Results: Ultrasound examination was ordered in 111 patients (68.9%) preoperatively. There was a strong correlation between the bimanual examination findings and the ultrasound dimensions. The equation for this relationship is ultrasound length (cm) = 3.68 + 0.68 x number of weeks (r = .78, P < .001). Ultrasound length also was related strongly to size given in the pathologic reports; the equation for this relationship is ultrasound length (cm) = 2.94 + 0.75 x pathology length (cm) (r = .73, P < .001). The correlation between bimanual examination and ultrasound findings was similar in obese and in nonobese patients, when uterine size could be estimated. Conclusion: There is a strong correlation between bimanual and ultrasound examinations with regard to determining the size of leiomyomatous uteri. Routine ultrasound is not indicated when an experienced examiner can assess uterine size. Ultrasonography may be appropriate when physical assessment is difficult, as in the case of obesity.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032125490&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032125490&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0029-7844(98)00131-8

DO - 10.1016/S0029-7844(98)00131-8

M3 - Article

C2 - 9649104

AN - SCOPUS:0032125490

VL - 92

SP - 109

EP - 112

JO - Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0029-7844

IS - 1

ER -