Comparison of assessment measures for post-stroke depression

Patricia Ryan Roger, Douglas E Johnson-Greene

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Depression is commonplace following stroke and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The objective of this study is to examine the sensitivity and specificity of four standardized measures for assessing depression in a stroke population. A total of 67 adults admitted to an inpatient rehabilitation unit with acute stroke were assessed with four standardized depression measures and by structured clinical interview as part of a cross-sectional study assessing cognitive and emotional functioning. Using DSM-IV criteria, major depression was present in 15% of the sample and minor depression in an additional 28%. The four depression measures yielded rates of depression ranging from 14% to 46% when their recommended clinical threshold scores were applied. The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) had the greatest positive predictive value (PPV) at 28%. Cutoff scores were adjusted using receiver operating curve (ROC) analyses, and PPV ranged from 28% to 34% when using lower cutoff scores, representing an improvement for all measures. Common assessment measures yield significantly different classification rates for depression in persons with acute stroke. Traditional threshold scores for commonly used objective depression measures may not be optimally sensitive for detection of depression in stroke populations. Based on the findings of this study we recommend clinicians use the Geriatric Depression Scale-Short Form using a cutoff score of 3 or greater. Clinical and research implications are offered.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)780-793
Number of pages14
JournalClinical Neuropsychologist
Volume23
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Stroke
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Geriatrics
Population
Inpatients
Epidemiologic Studies
Rehabilitation
Cross-Sectional Studies
Interviews
Morbidity
Sensitivity and Specificity
Mortality
Research

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • Depression
  • Stroke

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Comparison of assessment measures for post-stroke depression. / Roger, Patricia Ryan; Johnson-Greene, Douglas E.

In: Clinical Neuropsychologist, Vol. 23, No. 5, 01.07.2009, p. 780-793.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4088195166274b5fbacc5f0363c97228,
title = "Comparison of assessment measures for post-stroke depression",
abstract = "Depression is commonplace following stroke and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The objective of this study is to examine the sensitivity and specificity of four standardized measures for assessing depression in a stroke population. A total of 67 adults admitted to an inpatient rehabilitation unit with acute stroke were assessed with four standardized depression measures and by structured clinical interview as part of a cross-sectional study assessing cognitive and emotional functioning. Using DSM-IV criteria, major depression was present in 15{\%} of the sample and minor depression in an additional 28{\%}. The four depression measures yielded rates of depression ranging from 14{\%} to 46{\%} when their recommended clinical threshold scores were applied. The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) had the greatest positive predictive value (PPV) at 28{\%}. Cutoff scores were adjusted using receiver operating curve (ROC) analyses, and PPV ranged from 28{\%} to 34{\%} when using lower cutoff scores, representing an improvement for all measures. Common assessment measures yield significantly different classification rates for depression in persons with acute stroke. Traditional threshold scores for commonly used objective depression measures may not be optimally sensitive for detection of depression in stroke populations. Based on the findings of this study we recommend clinicians use the Geriatric Depression Scale-Short Form using a cutoff score of 3 or greater. Clinical and research implications are offered.",
keywords = "Assessment, Depression, Stroke",
author = "Roger, {Patricia Ryan} and Johnson-Greene, {Douglas E}",
year = "2009",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/13854040802691135",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "780--793",
journal = "Clinical Neuropsychologist",
issn = "1385-4046",
publisher = "Swets & Zeitlinger",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of assessment measures for post-stroke depression

AU - Roger, Patricia Ryan

AU - Johnson-Greene, Douglas E

PY - 2009/7/1

Y1 - 2009/7/1

N2 - Depression is commonplace following stroke and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The objective of this study is to examine the sensitivity and specificity of four standardized measures for assessing depression in a stroke population. A total of 67 adults admitted to an inpatient rehabilitation unit with acute stroke were assessed with four standardized depression measures and by structured clinical interview as part of a cross-sectional study assessing cognitive and emotional functioning. Using DSM-IV criteria, major depression was present in 15% of the sample and minor depression in an additional 28%. The four depression measures yielded rates of depression ranging from 14% to 46% when their recommended clinical threshold scores were applied. The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) had the greatest positive predictive value (PPV) at 28%. Cutoff scores were adjusted using receiver operating curve (ROC) analyses, and PPV ranged from 28% to 34% when using lower cutoff scores, representing an improvement for all measures. Common assessment measures yield significantly different classification rates for depression in persons with acute stroke. Traditional threshold scores for commonly used objective depression measures may not be optimally sensitive for detection of depression in stroke populations. Based on the findings of this study we recommend clinicians use the Geriatric Depression Scale-Short Form using a cutoff score of 3 or greater. Clinical and research implications are offered.

AB - Depression is commonplace following stroke and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The objective of this study is to examine the sensitivity and specificity of four standardized measures for assessing depression in a stroke population. A total of 67 adults admitted to an inpatient rehabilitation unit with acute stroke were assessed with four standardized depression measures and by structured clinical interview as part of a cross-sectional study assessing cognitive and emotional functioning. Using DSM-IV criteria, major depression was present in 15% of the sample and minor depression in an additional 28%. The four depression measures yielded rates of depression ranging from 14% to 46% when their recommended clinical threshold scores were applied. The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) had the greatest positive predictive value (PPV) at 28%. Cutoff scores were adjusted using receiver operating curve (ROC) analyses, and PPV ranged from 28% to 34% when using lower cutoff scores, representing an improvement for all measures. Common assessment measures yield significantly different classification rates for depression in persons with acute stroke. Traditional threshold scores for commonly used objective depression measures may not be optimally sensitive for detection of depression in stroke populations. Based on the findings of this study we recommend clinicians use the Geriatric Depression Scale-Short Form using a cutoff score of 3 or greater. Clinical and research implications are offered.

KW - Assessment

KW - Depression

KW - Stroke

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=69849087026&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=69849087026&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13854040802691135

DO - 10.1080/13854040802691135

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 780

EP - 793

JO - Clinical Neuropsychologist

JF - Clinical Neuropsychologist

SN - 1385-4046

IS - 5

ER -