Comparing tailored and narrative worksite interventions at increasing colonoscopy adherence in adults 50-75

A randomized controlled trial

Jakob D. Jensen, Andy J. King, Nick Carcioppolo, Melinda Krakow, N. Jewel Samadder, Susan Morgan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Research has identified several communication strategies that could increase adherence to colorectal cancer screening recommendations. Two promising strategies are tailoring and narrative-based approaches. Tailoring is the personalization of information based on individual characteristics. Narrative-based approaches use stories about similar others to counter perceived barriers and cultivate self-efficacy. To compare these two approaches, a randomized controlled trial was carried out at 8 worksites in Indiana. Adults 50-75 (N=209) received one of four messages about colorectal cancer screening: stock, narrative, tailored, tailored narrative. The primary outcome was whether participants filed a colonoscopy claim in the 18 months following the intervention. Individuals receiving narrative messages were 4 times more likely to screen than those not receiving narrative messages. Tailoring did not increase screening behavior overall. However, individuals with higher cancer information overload were 8 times more likely to screen if they received tailored messages. The results suggest that narrative-based approaches are more effective than tailoring at increasing colorectal cancer screening in worksite interventions. Tailoring may be valuable as a strategy for reaching individuals with high overload, perhaps as a follow-up effort to a larger communication campaign.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)31-40
Number of pages10
JournalSocial Science and Medicine
Volume104
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2014

Fingerprint

Colonoscopy
Early Detection of Cancer
Workplace
Colorectal Neoplasms
Randomized Controlled Trials
narrative
Communication
cancer
Self Efficacy
communication
Research
personalization
Adherence
Randomized Controlled Trial
Neoplasms
self-efficacy
campaign
Screening
Cancer

Keywords

  • Cancer information overload
  • Colonoscopy
  • Narratives
  • Randomized controlled trial
  • Tailoring
  • United States
  • Worksite interventions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Cite this

Comparing tailored and narrative worksite interventions at increasing colonoscopy adherence in adults 50-75 : A randomized controlled trial. / Jensen, Jakob D.; King, Andy J.; Carcioppolo, Nick; Krakow, Melinda; Samadder, N. Jewel; Morgan, Susan.

In: Social Science and Medicine, Vol. 104, 03.2014, p. 31-40.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{274335b91b6a4195a1d3546dbbb171ab,
title = "Comparing tailored and narrative worksite interventions at increasing colonoscopy adherence in adults 50-75: A randomized controlled trial",
abstract = "Research has identified several communication strategies that could increase adherence to colorectal cancer screening recommendations. Two promising strategies are tailoring and narrative-based approaches. Tailoring is the personalization of information based on individual characteristics. Narrative-based approaches use stories about similar others to counter perceived barriers and cultivate self-efficacy. To compare these two approaches, a randomized controlled trial was carried out at 8 worksites in Indiana. Adults 50-75 (N=209) received one of four messages about colorectal cancer screening: stock, narrative, tailored, tailored narrative. The primary outcome was whether participants filed a colonoscopy claim in the 18 months following the intervention. Individuals receiving narrative messages were 4 times more likely to screen than those not receiving narrative messages. Tailoring did not increase screening behavior overall. However, individuals with higher cancer information overload were 8 times more likely to screen if they received tailored messages. The results suggest that narrative-based approaches are more effective than tailoring at increasing colorectal cancer screening in worksite interventions. Tailoring may be valuable as a strategy for reaching individuals with high overload, perhaps as a follow-up effort to a larger communication campaign.",
keywords = "Cancer information overload, Colonoscopy, Narratives, Randomized controlled trial, Tailoring, United States, Worksite interventions",
author = "Jensen, {Jakob D.} and King, {Andy J.} and Nick Carcioppolo and Melinda Krakow and Samadder, {N. Jewel} and Susan Morgan",
year = "2014",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.12.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "104",
pages = "31--40",
journal = "Social Science and Medicine",
issn = "0277-9536",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing tailored and narrative worksite interventions at increasing colonoscopy adherence in adults 50-75

T2 - A randomized controlled trial

AU - Jensen, Jakob D.

AU - King, Andy J.

AU - Carcioppolo, Nick

AU - Krakow, Melinda

AU - Samadder, N. Jewel

AU - Morgan, Susan

PY - 2014/3

Y1 - 2014/3

N2 - Research has identified several communication strategies that could increase adherence to colorectal cancer screening recommendations. Two promising strategies are tailoring and narrative-based approaches. Tailoring is the personalization of information based on individual characteristics. Narrative-based approaches use stories about similar others to counter perceived barriers and cultivate self-efficacy. To compare these two approaches, a randomized controlled trial was carried out at 8 worksites in Indiana. Adults 50-75 (N=209) received one of four messages about colorectal cancer screening: stock, narrative, tailored, tailored narrative. The primary outcome was whether participants filed a colonoscopy claim in the 18 months following the intervention. Individuals receiving narrative messages were 4 times more likely to screen than those not receiving narrative messages. Tailoring did not increase screening behavior overall. However, individuals with higher cancer information overload were 8 times more likely to screen if they received tailored messages. The results suggest that narrative-based approaches are more effective than tailoring at increasing colorectal cancer screening in worksite interventions. Tailoring may be valuable as a strategy for reaching individuals with high overload, perhaps as a follow-up effort to a larger communication campaign.

AB - Research has identified several communication strategies that could increase adherence to colorectal cancer screening recommendations. Two promising strategies are tailoring and narrative-based approaches. Tailoring is the personalization of information based on individual characteristics. Narrative-based approaches use stories about similar others to counter perceived barriers and cultivate self-efficacy. To compare these two approaches, a randomized controlled trial was carried out at 8 worksites in Indiana. Adults 50-75 (N=209) received one of four messages about colorectal cancer screening: stock, narrative, tailored, tailored narrative. The primary outcome was whether participants filed a colonoscopy claim in the 18 months following the intervention. Individuals receiving narrative messages were 4 times more likely to screen than those not receiving narrative messages. Tailoring did not increase screening behavior overall. However, individuals with higher cancer information overload were 8 times more likely to screen if they received tailored messages. The results suggest that narrative-based approaches are more effective than tailoring at increasing colorectal cancer screening in worksite interventions. Tailoring may be valuable as a strategy for reaching individuals with high overload, perhaps as a follow-up effort to a larger communication campaign.

KW - Cancer information overload

KW - Colonoscopy

KW - Narratives

KW - Randomized controlled trial

KW - Tailoring

KW - United States

KW - Worksite interventions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84894495939&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84894495939&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.12.003

DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.12.003

M3 - Article

VL - 104

SP - 31

EP - 40

JO - Social Science and Medicine

JF - Social Science and Medicine

SN - 0277-9536

ER -