Comparative study of the efficacy of four topical anesthetics

Paul M. Friedman, Joshua P. Fogelman, Keyvan Nouri, Vicki J. Levine, Robin Ashinoff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

89 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND. With the emergence of new laser and dermatologic procedures, the need for more effective topical anesthesia continues to grow. There are now several topical anesthetics that are being used prior to laser and surgical procedures. OBJECTIVE. To compare the degree and duration of anesthesia produced by four commonly used topical anesthetics, we performed a prospective study investigating the efficacy of EMLA (eutectic mixture of local anesthetics), ELA-Max, 4% tetracaine gel, and betacaine-LA ointment (formerly eutectic-LA). METHODS. Equal amounts of the above topical anesthetics plus a control (eucerin cream) were applied to 10 test sites under occlusion on the volar forearms of 12 adult volunteers. After a 60- minute application time, the degree of anesthesia was assessed immediately by a Q-switched Nd:YAG laser at 1064 nm. Pain testing was also performed 30 minutes after the 60-minute application period. Volunteer responses to pain stimuli were recorded using an ordinal scale of 0 (no pain) to 4 (maximal pain). The mean scores for the time intervals were obtained. Analysis of the data was performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA), Newman-Keuls test, Friedman rank order test, and paired t-tests. RESULTS. ELA-Max, EMLA, and tetracaine were statistically superior to control after the 60-minute application period. Thirty minutes later, ELA-Max, EMLA, tetracaine, and betacaine-LA were all statistically superior to the control. Comparing individual anesthetics, ELA-Max and EMLA were the superior anesthetics at both time intervals. Although the mean pain scores for each anesthetic were lower 30 minutes after their removal, the differences did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION. This is the first prospective study comparing the efficacy of several new topical anesthetic agents.: Using the methodology of this study, in which the anesthetics were applied under occlusion, ELA-Max and EMLA were the superior anesthetics after a 60-minute application time and 30 minutes later. In addition, there was a clinical increase in efficacy suggested with all of the anesthetics 30 minutes after their removal.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)950-954
Number of pages5
JournalDermatologic Surgery
Volume25
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Local Anesthetics
Anesthetics
Tetracaine
Pain
Anesthesia
Volunteers
Lasers
Prospective Studies
Solid-State Lasers
Ointments
Forearm
Analysis of Variance
Gels
EMLA

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dermatology
  • Surgery

Cite this

Comparative study of the efficacy of four topical anesthetics. / Friedman, Paul M.; Fogelman, Joshua P.; Nouri, Keyvan; Levine, Vicki J.; Ashinoff, Robin.

In: Dermatologic Surgery, Vol. 25, No. 12, 01.12.1999, p. 950-954.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Friedman, PM, Fogelman, JP, Nouri, K, Levine, VJ & Ashinoff, R 1999, 'Comparative study of the efficacy of four topical anesthetics', Dermatologic Surgery, vol. 25, no. 12, pp. 950-954. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1524-4725.1999.99138.x
Friedman, Paul M. ; Fogelman, Joshua P. ; Nouri, Keyvan ; Levine, Vicki J. ; Ashinoff, Robin. / Comparative study of the efficacy of four topical anesthetics. In: Dermatologic Surgery. 1999 ; Vol. 25, No. 12. pp. 950-954.
@article{14bc467278da49599d3244b5f40c4c8a,
title = "Comparative study of the efficacy of four topical anesthetics",
abstract = "BACKGROUND. With the emergence of new laser and dermatologic procedures, the need for more effective topical anesthesia continues to grow. There are now several topical anesthetics that are being used prior to laser and surgical procedures. OBJECTIVE. To compare the degree and duration of anesthesia produced by four commonly used topical anesthetics, we performed a prospective study investigating the efficacy of EMLA (eutectic mixture of local anesthetics), ELA-Max, 4{\%} tetracaine gel, and betacaine-LA ointment (formerly eutectic-LA). METHODS. Equal amounts of the above topical anesthetics plus a control (eucerin cream) were applied to 10 test sites under occlusion on the volar forearms of 12 adult volunteers. After a 60- minute application time, the degree of anesthesia was assessed immediately by a Q-switched Nd:YAG laser at 1064 nm. Pain testing was also performed 30 minutes after the 60-minute application period. Volunteer responses to pain stimuli were recorded using an ordinal scale of 0 (no pain) to 4 (maximal pain). The mean scores for the time intervals were obtained. Analysis of the data was performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA), Newman-Keuls test, Friedman rank order test, and paired t-tests. RESULTS. ELA-Max, EMLA, and tetracaine were statistically superior to control after the 60-minute application period. Thirty minutes later, ELA-Max, EMLA, tetracaine, and betacaine-LA were all statistically superior to the control. Comparing individual anesthetics, ELA-Max and EMLA were the superior anesthetics at both time intervals. Although the mean pain scores for each anesthetic were lower 30 minutes after their removal, the differences did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION. This is the first prospective study comparing the efficacy of several new topical anesthetic agents.: Using the methodology of this study, in which the anesthetics were applied under occlusion, ELA-Max and EMLA were the superior anesthetics after a 60-minute application time and 30 minutes later. In addition, there was a clinical increase in efficacy suggested with all of the anesthetics 30 minutes after their removal.",
author = "Friedman, {Paul M.} and Fogelman, {Joshua P.} and Keyvan Nouri and Levine, {Vicki J.} and Robin Ashinoff",
year = "1999",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1046/j.1524-4725.1999.99138.x",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "950--954",
journal = "Dermatologic Surgery",
issn = "1076-0512",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative study of the efficacy of four topical anesthetics

AU - Friedman, Paul M.

AU - Fogelman, Joshua P.

AU - Nouri, Keyvan

AU - Levine, Vicki J.

AU - Ashinoff, Robin

PY - 1999/12/1

Y1 - 1999/12/1

N2 - BACKGROUND. With the emergence of new laser and dermatologic procedures, the need for more effective topical anesthesia continues to grow. There are now several topical anesthetics that are being used prior to laser and surgical procedures. OBJECTIVE. To compare the degree and duration of anesthesia produced by four commonly used topical anesthetics, we performed a prospective study investigating the efficacy of EMLA (eutectic mixture of local anesthetics), ELA-Max, 4% tetracaine gel, and betacaine-LA ointment (formerly eutectic-LA). METHODS. Equal amounts of the above topical anesthetics plus a control (eucerin cream) were applied to 10 test sites under occlusion on the volar forearms of 12 adult volunteers. After a 60- minute application time, the degree of anesthesia was assessed immediately by a Q-switched Nd:YAG laser at 1064 nm. Pain testing was also performed 30 minutes after the 60-minute application period. Volunteer responses to pain stimuli were recorded using an ordinal scale of 0 (no pain) to 4 (maximal pain). The mean scores for the time intervals were obtained. Analysis of the data was performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA), Newman-Keuls test, Friedman rank order test, and paired t-tests. RESULTS. ELA-Max, EMLA, and tetracaine were statistically superior to control after the 60-minute application period. Thirty minutes later, ELA-Max, EMLA, tetracaine, and betacaine-LA were all statistically superior to the control. Comparing individual anesthetics, ELA-Max and EMLA were the superior anesthetics at both time intervals. Although the mean pain scores for each anesthetic were lower 30 minutes after their removal, the differences did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION. This is the first prospective study comparing the efficacy of several new topical anesthetic agents.: Using the methodology of this study, in which the anesthetics were applied under occlusion, ELA-Max and EMLA were the superior anesthetics after a 60-minute application time and 30 minutes later. In addition, there was a clinical increase in efficacy suggested with all of the anesthetics 30 minutes after their removal.

AB - BACKGROUND. With the emergence of new laser and dermatologic procedures, the need for more effective topical anesthesia continues to grow. There are now several topical anesthetics that are being used prior to laser and surgical procedures. OBJECTIVE. To compare the degree and duration of anesthesia produced by four commonly used topical anesthetics, we performed a prospective study investigating the efficacy of EMLA (eutectic mixture of local anesthetics), ELA-Max, 4% tetracaine gel, and betacaine-LA ointment (formerly eutectic-LA). METHODS. Equal amounts of the above topical anesthetics plus a control (eucerin cream) were applied to 10 test sites under occlusion on the volar forearms of 12 adult volunteers. After a 60- minute application time, the degree of anesthesia was assessed immediately by a Q-switched Nd:YAG laser at 1064 nm. Pain testing was also performed 30 minutes after the 60-minute application period. Volunteer responses to pain stimuli were recorded using an ordinal scale of 0 (no pain) to 4 (maximal pain). The mean scores for the time intervals were obtained. Analysis of the data was performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA), Newman-Keuls test, Friedman rank order test, and paired t-tests. RESULTS. ELA-Max, EMLA, and tetracaine were statistically superior to control after the 60-minute application period. Thirty minutes later, ELA-Max, EMLA, tetracaine, and betacaine-LA were all statistically superior to the control. Comparing individual anesthetics, ELA-Max and EMLA were the superior anesthetics at both time intervals. Although the mean pain scores for each anesthetic were lower 30 minutes after their removal, the differences did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION. This is the first prospective study comparing the efficacy of several new topical anesthetic agents.: Using the methodology of this study, in which the anesthetics were applied under occlusion, ELA-Max and EMLA were the superior anesthetics after a 60-minute application time and 30 minutes later. In addition, there was a clinical increase in efficacy suggested with all of the anesthetics 30 minutes after their removal.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033400134&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033400134&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1046/j.1524-4725.1999.99138.x

DO - 10.1046/j.1524-4725.1999.99138.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 10594629

AN - SCOPUS:0033400134

VL - 25

SP - 950

EP - 954

JO - Dermatologic Surgery

JF - Dermatologic Surgery

SN - 1076-0512

IS - 12

ER -