Community Power Structure Analysis and the Ethical Considerations of "Studying Up"

Natalie M. Kivell, Scot Evans, Susan E. Paterson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This narrative outlines our challenges in studying power and power structures within an individual-level ethical framework. Taking a social ethics perspective, we share the story of our "sticky situation" (Campbell, ) that transpired during a multi-year community partnership. We were asked, by our community partners, to help collect interview data without informed consent. As a team of community-engaged university researchers, we were faced with a seemingly easy ethical situation (no consent, no research) that had unexpectedly complicated and long-lasting consequences. This experience revealed to us how community-engaged research and action, under a traditional ethics framework, can often work to protect those in positions of power and offer little to disrupt the status quo. Reflecting on the tension between individual and social ethics, we discuss the limitations of an individual-level framework, including the definitions for respect for persons, justice, and beneficence, on our ability as a field to understand, critique, and contribute to the dismantling of oppressive power structures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAmerican Journal of Community Psychology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2017

Fingerprint

Ethical Analysis
social ethics
Ethics
community
community research
dismantling
distribution of power
Beneficence
respect
Social Justice
Informed Consent
justice
moral philosophy
Research
narrative
human being
university
Research Personnel
ability
Interviews

Keywords

  • Community-engaged research
  • Critical scholarship
  • Ethics
  • Informed consent
  • Power
  • Social ethics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Applied Psychology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Community Power Structure Analysis and the Ethical Considerations of "Studying Up". / Kivell, Natalie M.; Evans, Scot; Paterson, Susan E.

In: American Journal of Community Psychology, 2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{dffa7b23401d4a88928e5d8660f92519,
title = "Community Power Structure Analysis and the Ethical Considerations of {"}Studying Up{"}",
abstract = "This narrative outlines our challenges in studying power and power structures within an individual-level ethical framework. Taking a social ethics perspective, we share the story of our {"}sticky situation{"} (Campbell, ) that transpired during a multi-year community partnership. We were asked, by our community partners, to help collect interview data without informed consent. As a team of community-engaged university researchers, we were faced with a seemingly easy ethical situation (no consent, no research) that had unexpectedly complicated and long-lasting consequences. This experience revealed to us how community-engaged research and action, under a traditional ethics framework, can often work to protect those in positions of power and offer little to disrupt the status quo. Reflecting on the tension between individual and social ethics, we discuss the limitations of an individual-level framework, including the definitions for respect for persons, justice, and beneficence, on our ability as a field to understand, critique, and contribute to the dismantling of oppressive power structures.",
keywords = "Community-engaged research, Critical scholarship, Ethics, Informed consent, Power, Social ethics",
author = "Kivell, {Natalie M.} and Scot Evans and Paterson, {Susan E.}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1002/ajcp.12190",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "American Journal of Community Psychology",
issn = "0091-0562",
publisher = "Springer New York",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Community Power Structure Analysis and the Ethical Considerations of "Studying Up"

AU - Kivell, Natalie M.

AU - Evans, Scot

AU - Paterson, Susan E.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - This narrative outlines our challenges in studying power and power structures within an individual-level ethical framework. Taking a social ethics perspective, we share the story of our "sticky situation" (Campbell, ) that transpired during a multi-year community partnership. We were asked, by our community partners, to help collect interview data without informed consent. As a team of community-engaged university researchers, we were faced with a seemingly easy ethical situation (no consent, no research) that had unexpectedly complicated and long-lasting consequences. This experience revealed to us how community-engaged research and action, under a traditional ethics framework, can often work to protect those in positions of power and offer little to disrupt the status quo. Reflecting on the tension between individual and social ethics, we discuss the limitations of an individual-level framework, including the definitions for respect for persons, justice, and beneficence, on our ability as a field to understand, critique, and contribute to the dismantling of oppressive power structures.

AB - This narrative outlines our challenges in studying power and power structures within an individual-level ethical framework. Taking a social ethics perspective, we share the story of our "sticky situation" (Campbell, ) that transpired during a multi-year community partnership. We were asked, by our community partners, to help collect interview data without informed consent. As a team of community-engaged university researchers, we were faced with a seemingly easy ethical situation (no consent, no research) that had unexpectedly complicated and long-lasting consequences. This experience revealed to us how community-engaged research and action, under a traditional ethics framework, can often work to protect those in positions of power and offer little to disrupt the status quo. Reflecting on the tension between individual and social ethics, we discuss the limitations of an individual-level framework, including the definitions for respect for persons, justice, and beneficence, on our ability as a field to understand, critique, and contribute to the dismantling of oppressive power structures.

KW - Community-engaged research

KW - Critical scholarship

KW - Ethics

KW - Informed consent

KW - Power

KW - Social ethics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031321477&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85031321477&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ajcp.12190

DO - 10.1002/ajcp.12190

M3 - Article

C2 - 29027673

AN - SCOPUS:85031321477

JO - American Journal of Community Psychology

JF - American Journal of Community Psychology

SN - 0091-0562

ER -