Coherence and specificity of information-processing biases in depression and social phobia

Ian H. Gotlib, Karen L. Kasch, Saskia Traill, Bruce A. Arnow, Jutta Joormann, Sheri L. Johnson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

253 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Research has not resolved whether depression is associated with a distinct information-processing bias, whether the content of the information-processing bias in depression is specific to themes of loss and sadness, or whether biases are consistent across the tasks most commonly used to assess attention and memory processing. In the present study, participants diagnosed with major depression, social phobia, or no Axis I disorder, completed several information-processing tasks assessing attention and memory for sad, socially threatening, physically threatening, and positive stimuli. As predicted, depressed participants exhibited specific biases for stimuli connoting sadness; social phobic participants did not evidence such specificity for threat stimuli. It is important to note that the different measures of bias in memory and attention were not systematically intercorrelated. Implications for the study of cognitive bias in depression, and for cognitive theory more broadly, are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)386-398
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Abnormal Psychology
Volume113
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2004

Fingerprint

Automatic Data Processing
Depression
Social Phobia
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Gotlib, I. H., Kasch, K. L., Traill, S., Arnow, B. A., Joormann, J., & Johnson, S. L. (2004). Coherence and specificity of information-processing biases in depression and social phobia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 113(3), 386-398. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.113.3.386

Coherence and specificity of information-processing biases in depression and social phobia. / Gotlib, Ian H.; Kasch, Karen L.; Traill, Saskia; Arnow, Bruce A.; Joormann, Jutta; Johnson, Sheri L.

In: Journal of Abnormal Psychology, Vol. 113, No. 3, 01.08.2004, p. 386-398.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gotlib, IH, Kasch, KL, Traill, S, Arnow, BA, Joormann, J & Johnson, SL 2004, 'Coherence and specificity of information-processing biases in depression and social phobia', Journal of Abnormal Psychology, vol. 113, no. 3, pp. 386-398. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.113.3.386
Gotlib, Ian H. ; Kasch, Karen L. ; Traill, Saskia ; Arnow, Bruce A. ; Joormann, Jutta ; Johnson, Sheri L. / Coherence and specificity of information-processing biases in depression and social phobia. In: Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 2004 ; Vol. 113, No. 3. pp. 386-398.
@article{6ac3d2b44ac94cd28c017493b80617f1,
title = "Coherence and specificity of information-processing biases in depression and social phobia",
abstract = "Research has not resolved whether depression is associated with a distinct information-processing bias, whether the content of the information-processing bias in depression is specific to themes of loss and sadness, or whether biases are consistent across the tasks most commonly used to assess attention and memory processing. In the present study, participants diagnosed with major depression, social phobia, or no Axis I disorder, completed several information-processing tasks assessing attention and memory for sad, socially threatening, physically threatening, and positive stimuli. As predicted, depressed participants exhibited specific biases for stimuli connoting sadness; social phobic participants did not evidence such specificity for threat stimuli. It is important to note that the different measures of bias in memory and attention were not systematically intercorrelated. Implications for the study of cognitive bias in depression, and for cognitive theory more broadly, are discussed.",
author = "Gotlib, {Ian H.} and Kasch, {Karen L.} and Saskia Traill and Arnow, {Bruce A.} and Jutta Joormann and Johnson, {Sheri L.}",
year = "2004",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/0021-843X.113.3.386",
language = "English",
volume = "113",
pages = "386--398",
journal = "Journal of Abnormal Psychology",
issn = "0021-843X",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Coherence and specificity of information-processing biases in depression and social phobia

AU - Gotlib, Ian H.

AU - Kasch, Karen L.

AU - Traill, Saskia

AU - Arnow, Bruce A.

AU - Joormann, Jutta

AU - Johnson, Sheri L.

PY - 2004/8/1

Y1 - 2004/8/1

N2 - Research has not resolved whether depression is associated with a distinct information-processing bias, whether the content of the information-processing bias in depression is specific to themes of loss and sadness, or whether biases are consistent across the tasks most commonly used to assess attention and memory processing. In the present study, participants diagnosed with major depression, social phobia, or no Axis I disorder, completed several information-processing tasks assessing attention and memory for sad, socially threatening, physically threatening, and positive stimuli. As predicted, depressed participants exhibited specific biases for stimuli connoting sadness; social phobic participants did not evidence such specificity for threat stimuli. It is important to note that the different measures of bias in memory and attention were not systematically intercorrelated. Implications for the study of cognitive bias in depression, and for cognitive theory more broadly, are discussed.

AB - Research has not resolved whether depression is associated with a distinct information-processing bias, whether the content of the information-processing bias in depression is specific to themes of loss and sadness, or whether biases are consistent across the tasks most commonly used to assess attention and memory processing. In the present study, participants diagnosed with major depression, social phobia, or no Axis I disorder, completed several information-processing tasks assessing attention and memory for sad, socially threatening, physically threatening, and positive stimuli. As predicted, depressed participants exhibited specific biases for stimuli connoting sadness; social phobic participants did not evidence such specificity for threat stimuli. It is important to note that the different measures of bias in memory and attention were not systematically intercorrelated. Implications for the study of cognitive bias in depression, and for cognitive theory more broadly, are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3843107913&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=3843107913&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0021-843X.113.3.386

DO - 10.1037/0021-843X.113.3.386

M3 - Article

C2 - 15311984

AN - SCOPUS:3843107913

VL - 113

SP - 386

EP - 398

JO - Journal of Abnormal Psychology

JF - Journal of Abnormal Psychology

SN - 0021-843X

IS - 3

ER -