Cochlear implantation in patients with compromised healing

Onur Odabasi, Steven Ross Mobley, Rodrigo A. Bolanos, Annelle Hodges, Thomas Balkany

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The indications for cochlear implantation (CI) are continually evolving and, as experience accumulates, the relative contraindications for CI continue to decrease. However, there is little information regarding CI in patients who may be considered to be at risk for poor wound healing due to immunosuppression or intercurrent disease. OBJECTIVE: To assess and report the complication rates, postoperative course, postimplant rehabilitation, and long-term performance of patients considered at risk due to presumably impaired healing capability. We hypothesized that these patients had outcomes similar to other implanted patients. METHODS: This is a retrospective chart review of 277 patients who have received CI at the University of Miami Ear institute between 1990 and 1999. The clinical courses of 6 patients on immunosuppressive medications and 7 patients with diseases believed to be associated with poor healing are reported. RESULTS: Long-term follow-up (mean, 33 months) showed postoperative complication rates, performance, and rehabilitation compliance that were similar to published reports of noncompromised patients. CONCLUSION: CI of selected patients with potentially reduced healing capabilities is safe and effective.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)738-741
Number of pages4
JournalOtolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
Volume123
Issue number6
StatePublished - Dec 20 2000

Fingerprint

Cochlear Implantation
Rehabilitation
Immunosuppressive Agents
Wound Healing
Immunosuppression
Ear

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Odabasi, O., Mobley, S. R., Bolanos, R. A., Hodges, A., & Balkany, T. (2000). Cochlear implantation in patients with compromised healing. Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 123(6), 738-741.

Cochlear implantation in patients with compromised healing. / Odabasi, Onur; Mobley, Steven Ross; Bolanos, Rodrigo A.; Hodges, Annelle; Balkany, Thomas.

In: Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Vol. 123, No. 6, 20.12.2000, p. 738-741.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Odabasi, O, Mobley, SR, Bolanos, RA, Hodges, A & Balkany, T 2000, 'Cochlear implantation in patients with compromised healing', Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, vol. 123, no. 6, pp. 738-741.
Odabasi O, Mobley SR, Bolanos RA, Hodges A, Balkany T. Cochlear implantation in patients with compromised healing. Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. 2000 Dec 20;123(6):738-741.
Odabasi, Onur ; Mobley, Steven Ross ; Bolanos, Rodrigo A. ; Hodges, Annelle ; Balkany, Thomas. / Cochlear implantation in patients with compromised healing. In: Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. 2000 ; Vol. 123, No. 6. pp. 738-741.
@article{1c528e2b634e40c89152ee886bd67d35,
title = "Cochlear implantation in patients with compromised healing",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The indications for cochlear implantation (CI) are continually evolving and, as experience accumulates, the relative contraindications for CI continue to decrease. However, there is little information regarding CI in patients who may be considered to be at risk for poor wound healing due to immunosuppression or intercurrent disease. OBJECTIVE: To assess and report the complication rates, postoperative course, postimplant rehabilitation, and long-term performance of patients considered at risk due to presumably impaired healing capability. We hypothesized that these patients had outcomes similar to other implanted patients. METHODS: This is a retrospective chart review of 277 patients who have received CI at the University of Miami Ear institute between 1990 and 1999. The clinical courses of 6 patients on immunosuppressive medications and 7 patients with diseases believed to be associated with poor healing are reported. RESULTS: Long-term follow-up (mean, 33 months) showed postoperative complication rates, performance, and rehabilitation compliance that were similar to published reports of noncompromised patients. CONCLUSION: CI of selected patients with potentially reduced healing capabilities is safe and effective.",
author = "Onur Odabasi and Mobley, {Steven Ross} and Bolanos, {Rodrigo A.} and Annelle Hodges and Thomas Balkany",
year = "2000",
month = "12",
day = "20",
language = "English",
volume = "123",
pages = "738--741",
journal = "Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)",
issn = "0194-5998",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cochlear implantation in patients with compromised healing

AU - Odabasi, Onur

AU - Mobley, Steven Ross

AU - Bolanos, Rodrigo A.

AU - Hodges, Annelle

AU - Balkany, Thomas

PY - 2000/12/20

Y1 - 2000/12/20

N2 - BACKGROUND: The indications for cochlear implantation (CI) are continually evolving and, as experience accumulates, the relative contraindications for CI continue to decrease. However, there is little information regarding CI in patients who may be considered to be at risk for poor wound healing due to immunosuppression or intercurrent disease. OBJECTIVE: To assess and report the complication rates, postoperative course, postimplant rehabilitation, and long-term performance of patients considered at risk due to presumably impaired healing capability. We hypothesized that these patients had outcomes similar to other implanted patients. METHODS: This is a retrospective chart review of 277 patients who have received CI at the University of Miami Ear institute between 1990 and 1999. The clinical courses of 6 patients on immunosuppressive medications and 7 patients with diseases believed to be associated with poor healing are reported. RESULTS: Long-term follow-up (mean, 33 months) showed postoperative complication rates, performance, and rehabilitation compliance that were similar to published reports of noncompromised patients. CONCLUSION: CI of selected patients with potentially reduced healing capabilities is safe and effective.

AB - BACKGROUND: The indications for cochlear implantation (CI) are continually evolving and, as experience accumulates, the relative contraindications for CI continue to decrease. However, there is little information regarding CI in patients who may be considered to be at risk for poor wound healing due to immunosuppression or intercurrent disease. OBJECTIVE: To assess and report the complication rates, postoperative course, postimplant rehabilitation, and long-term performance of patients considered at risk due to presumably impaired healing capability. We hypothesized that these patients had outcomes similar to other implanted patients. METHODS: This is a retrospective chart review of 277 patients who have received CI at the University of Miami Ear institute between 1990 and 1999. The clinical courses of 6 patients on immunosuppressive medications and 7 patients with diseases believed to be associated with poor healing are reported. RESULTS: Long-term follow-up (mean, 33 months) showed postoperative complication rates, performance, and rehabilitation compliance that were similar to published reports of noncompromised patients. CONCLUSION: CI of selected patients with potentially reduced healing capabilities is safe and effective.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033669889&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033669889&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 11112968

AN - SCOPUS:0033669889

VL - 123

SP - 738

EP - 741

JO - Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)

JF - Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)

SN - 0194-5998

IS - 6

ER -