Coaching competency and (exploratory) structural equation modeling: Asubstantive-methodological synergy

Nicholas Myers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this manuscript was to provide a substantive-methodological synergy of potential importance to future research in the psychology of sport and exercise. Design: The substantive focus was the emerging role for, and particularly the measurement of, athletes' evaluations of their coach's competency within conceptual models of effective coaching. The methodological focus was exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM), a methodology that integrates the advantages of exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) within the general structural equation model. Methods: The synergy was a demonstration of when a new and flexible methodological framework, ESEM, may be preferred as compared to a more familiar and restrictive methodological framework, CFA, by reanalyzing existing data. Results: ESEM analysis on extant datasets suggested that for responses to the Athletes' Perceptions of Coaching Competency Scale II - High School Teams (APCCS II-HST), a CFA model based on the relevant literature plus one post hoc modification, offered a viable alternative to a more complex ESEM model. For responses to the Coaching Competency Scale (CCS), a CFA model based on the relevant literature did not offer a viable alternative to a more complex ESEM model. Conclusions: The ESEM framework should be strongly considered in subsequent studies validity studies - for new and/or existing instruments in the psychology of sport and exercise. A key consideration for deciding between ESEM and the accompanying rotation criterion and CFA in future validity studies should be level of a priori measurement theory.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)709-718
Number of pages10
JournalPsychology of Sport and Exercise
Volume14
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2013

Fingerprint

Statistical Factor Analysis
Athletes
Exercise
Structural Models
Mentoring
Sports Psychology

Keywords

  • Athlete's evaluations
  • Categorical data
  • Coaching effectiveness
  • Geomin
  • Target

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Coaching competency and (exploratory) structural equation modeling : Asubstantive-methodological synergy. / Myers, Nicholas.

In: Psychology of Sport and Exercise, Vol. 14, No. 5, 01.09.2013, p. 709-718.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9d7fabd96866450e8a465ff7b14c86c3,
title = "Coaching competency and (exploratory) structural equation modeling: Asubstantive-methodological synergy",
abstract = "Objectives: The purpose of this manuscript was to provide a substantive-methodological synergy of potential importance to future research in the psychology of sport and exercise. Design: The substantive focus was the emerging role for, and particularly the measurement of, athletes' evaluations of their coach's competency within conceptual models of effective coaching. The methodological focus was exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM), a methodology that integrates the advantages of exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) within the general structural equation model. Methods: The synergy was a demonstration of when a new and flexible methodological framework, ESEM, may be preferred as compared to a more familiar and restrictive methodological framework, CFA, by reanalyzing existing data. Results: ESEM analysis on extant datasets suggested that for responses to the Athletes' Perceptions of Coaching Competency Scale II - High School Teams (APCCS II-HST), a CFA model based on the relevant literature plus one post hoc modification, offered a viable alternative to a more complex ESEM model. For responses to the Coaching Competency Scale (CCS), a CFA model based on the relevant literature did not offer a viable alternative to a more complex ESEM model. Conclusions: The ESEM framework should be strongly considered in subsequent studies validity studies - for new and/or existing instruments in the psychology of sport and exercise. A key consideration for deciding between ESEM and the accompanying rotation criterion and CFA in future validity studies should be level of a priori measurement theory.",
keywords = "Athlete's evaluations, Categorical data, Coaching effectiveness, Geomin, Target",
author = "Nicholas Myers",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.psychsport.2013.04.008",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "709--718",
journal = "Psychology of Sport and Exercise",
issn = "1469-0292",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Coaching competency and (exploratory) structural equation modeling

T2 - Asubstantive-methodological synergy

AU - Myers, Nicholas

PY - 2013/9/1

Y1 - 2013/9/1

N2 - Objectives: The purpose of this manuscript was to provide a substantive-methodological synergy of potential importance to future research in the psychology of sport and exercise. Design: The substantive focus was the emerging role for, and particularly the measurement of, athletes' evaluations of their coach's competency within conceptual models of effective coaching. The methodological focus was exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM), a methodology that integrates the advantages of exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) within the general structural equation model. Methods: The synergy was a demonstration of when a new and flexible methodological framework, ESEM, may be preferred as compared to a more familiar and restrictive methodological framework, CFA, by reanalyzing existing data. Results: ESEM analysis on extant datasets suggested that for responses to the Athletes' Perceptions of Coaching Competency Scale II - High School Teams (APCCS II-HST), a CFA model based on the relevant literature plus one post hoc modification, offered a viable alternative to a more complex ESEM model. For responses to the Coaching Competency Scale (CCS), a CFA model based on the relevant literature did not offer a viable alternative to a more complex ESEM model. Conclusions: The ESEM framework should be strongly considered in subsequent studies validity studies - for new and/or existing instruments in the psychology of sport and exercise. A key consideration for deciding between ESEM and the accompanying rotation criterion and CFA in future validity studies should be level of a priori measurement theory.

AB - Objectives: The purpose of this manuscript was to provide a substantive-methodological synergy of potential importance to future research in the psychology of sport and exercise. Design: The substantive focus was the emerging role for, and particularly the measurement of, athletes' evaluations of their coach's competency within conceptual models of effective coaching. The methodological focus was exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM), a methodology that integrates the advantages of exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) within the general structural equation model. Methods: The synergy was a demonstration of when a new and flexible methodological framework, ESEM, may be preferred as compared to a more familiar and restrictive methodological framework, CFA, by reanalyzing existing data. Results: ESEM analysis on extant datasets suggested that for responses to the Athletes' Perceptions of Coaching Competency Scale II - High School Teams (APCCS II-HST), a CFA model based on the relevant literature plus one post hoc modification, offered a viable alternative to a more complex ESEM model. For responses to the Coaching Competency Scale (CCS), a CFA model based on the relevant literature did not offer a viable alternative to a more complex ESEM model. Conclusions: The ESEM framework should be strongly considered in subsequent studies validity studies - for new and/or existing instruments in the psychology of sport and exercise. A key consideration for deciding between ESEM and the accompanying rotation criterion and CFA in future validity studies should be level of a priori measurement theory.

KW - Athlete's evaluations

KW - Categorical data

KW - Coaching effectiveness

KW - Geomin

KW - Target

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878840512&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878840512&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.psychsport.2013.04.008

DO - 10.1016/j.psychsport.2013.04.008

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84878840512

VL - 14

SP - 709

EP - 718

JO - Psychology of Sport and Exercise

JF - Psychology of Sport and Exercise

SN - 1469-0292

IS - 5

ER -