Closing the research to practice gap: Redefining feasibility

Stacy L. Frazier, Diana Formoso, Dina Birman, Marc S. Atkins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent attention to closing the research to practice gap reflects a new paradigm in which community partners assume more active roles in intervention research. Funders are shaping this new genre of collaborative research, and yet still require letters of support from investigators documenting access to sites as evidence of feasibility. Defining feasibility by access, however, derives from a basic research model that translates poorly to a collaborative one. At the same time, university-community collaboration within externally funded research poses a number of ethical challenges. We encourage a redefinition of feasibility that prioritizes collaboration by reconstructing the purpose and content of letters of support and by encouraging investigators to build into studies sufficient time and specific plans for building sustainable partnerships.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)125-129
Number of pages5
JournalClinical Psychology: Science and Practice
Volume15
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Research
Research Personnel
Professional Practice Gaps

Keywords

  • Community collaboration
  • Feasibility
  • Research-to-practice

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Closing the research to practice gap : Redefining feasibility. / Frazier, Stacy L.; Formoso, Diana; Birman, Dina; Atkins, Marc S.

In: Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, Vol. 15, No. 2, 06.2008, p. 125-129.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Frazier, Stacy L. ; Formoso, Diana ; Birman, Dina ; Atkins, Marc S. / Closing the research to practice gap : Redefining feasibility. In: Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice. 2008 ; Vol. 15, No. 2. pp. 125-129.
@article{d752057872f84926a6a58235e122e2b7,
title = "Closing the research to practice gap: Redefining feasibility",
abstract = "Recent attention to closing the research to practice gap reflects a new paradigm in which community partners assume more active roles in intervention research. Funders are shaping this new genre of collaborative research, and yet still require letters of support from investigators documenting access to sites as evidence of feasibility. Defining feasibility by access, however, derives from a basic research model that translates poorly to a collaborative one. At the same time, university-community collaboration within externally funded research poses a number of ethical challenges. We encourage a redefinition of feasibility that prioritizes collaboration by reconstructing the purpose and content of letters of support and by encouraging investigators to build into studies sufficient time and specific plans for building sustainable partnerships.",
keywords = "Community collaboration, Feasibility, Research-to-practice",
author = "Frazier, {Stacy L.} and Diana Formoso and Dina Birman and Atkins, {Marc S.}",
year = "2008",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1111/j.1468-2850.2008.00120.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "125--129",
journal = "Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice",
issn = "0969-5893",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Closing the research to practice gap

T2 - Redefining feasibility

AU - Frazier, Stacy L.

AU - Formoso, Diana

AU - Birman, Dina

AU - Atkins, Marc S.

PY - 2008/6

Y1 - 2008/6

N2 - Recent attention to closing the research to practice gap reflects a new paradigm in which community partners assume more active roles in intervention research. Funders are shaping this new genre of collaborative research, and yet still require letters of support from investigators documenting access to sites as evidence of feasibility. Defining feasibility by access, however, derives from a basic research model that translates poorly to a collaborative one. At the same time, university-community collaboration within externally funded research poses a number of ethical challenges. We encourage a redefinition of feasibility that prioritizes collaboration by reconstructing the purpose and content of letters of support and by encouraging investigators to build into studies sufficient time and specific plans for building sustainable partnerships.

AB - Recent attention to closing the research to practice gap reflects a new paradigm in which community partners assume more active roles in intervention research. Funders are shaping this new genre of collaborative research, and yet still require letters of support from investigators documenting access to sites as evidence of feasibility. Defining feasibility by access, however, derives from a basic research model that translates poorly to a collaborative one. At the same time, university-community collaboration within externally funded research poses a number of ethical challenges. We encourage a redefinition of feasibility that prioritizes collaboration by reconstructing the purpose and content of letters of support and by encouraging investigators to build into studies sufficient time and specific plans for building sustainable partnerships.

KW - Community collaboration

KW - Feasibility

KW - Research-to-practice

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=44349132832&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=44349132832&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1468-2850.2008.00120.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1468-2850.2008.00120.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:44349132832

VL - 15

SP - 125

EP - 129

JO - Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice

JF - Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice

SN - 0969-5893

IS - 2

ER -