Closed Ranks in microcosm: Pitfalls of a training experience in community consultation

Gilbert Berken; Carl Eisdorfer

doi:10.1007/BF01434655

Closed Ranks in microcosm: Pitfalls of a training experience in community consultation

Gilbert Berken, Carl Eisdorfer

Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

The process involved in the rejection of an individual or an entire mental health team from a community is a matter of importance to mental health professionals. The authors attempt to compare the experiences of a resident taking an elective in community consultation and the process of failure related by the Cummingses in Closed Ranks. The usefulness of clinical "post-mortem" sessions by colleagues within the program is emphasized as a means of analyzing a potential crisis and provides an opportunity to assess prevailing community attitudes. Selected operational hypotheses are presented to assist in preventing program failures.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	101-109
Number of pages	9
Journal	Community Mental Health Journal
Volume	6
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01434655
State	Published - Apr 1970

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Health(social science)
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Psychiatry and Mental health

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following Sustainable Development Goal(s)

Access to Document

10.1007/BF01434655

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Closed Ranks in microcosm: Pitfalls of a training experience in community consultation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@article{2d31bdde5a0f4f30a7fb45a6ef16e8da,

title = "Closed Ranks in microcosm: Pitfalls of a training experience in community consultation",

abstract = "The process involved in the rejection of an individual or an entire mental health team from a community is a matter of importance to mental health professionals. The authors attempt to compare the experiences of a resident taking an elective in community consultation and the process of failure related by the Cummingses in Closed Ranks. The usefulness of clinical {"}post-mortem{"} sessions by colleagues within the program is emphasized as a means of analyzing a potential crisis and provides an opportunity to assess prevailing community attitudes. Selected operational hypotheses are presented to assist in preventing program failures.",

author = "Gilbert Berken and Carl Eisdorfer",

year = "1970",

month = apr,

doi = "10.1007/BF01434655",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "6",

pages = "101--109",

journal = "Community Mental Health Journal",

issn = "0010-3853",

publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Closed Ranks in microcosm

T2 - Pitfalls of a training experience in community consultation

AU - Berken, Gilbert

AU - Eisdorfer, Carl

PY - 1970/4

Y1 - 1970/4

N2 - The process involved in the rejection of an individual or an entire mental health team from a community is a matter of importance to mental health professionals. The authors attempt to compare the experiences of a resident taking an elective in community consultation and the process of failure related by the Cummingses in Closed Ranks. The usefulness of clinical "post-mortem" sessions by colleagues within the program is emphasized as a means of analyzing a potential crisis and provides an opportunity to assess prevailing community attitudes. Selected operational hypotheses are presented to assist in preventing program failures.

AB - The process involved in the rejection of an individual or an entire mental health team from a community is a matter of importance to mental health professionals. The authors attempt to compare the experiences of a resident taking an elective in community consultation and the process of failure related by the Cummingses in Closed Ranks. The usefulness of clinical "post-mortem" sessions by colleagues within the program is emphasized as a means of analyzing a potential crisis and provides an opportunity to assess prevailing community attitudes. Selected operational hypotheses are presented to assist in preventing program failures.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0014768581&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0014768581&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF01434655

DO - 10.1007/BF01434655

M3 - Article

C2 - 5520452

AN - SCOPUS:0014768581

VL - 6

SP - 101

EP - 109

JO - Community Mental Health Journal

JF - Community Mental Health Journal

SN - 0010-3853

IS - 2

ER -

Closed Ranks in microcosm: Pitfalls of a training experience in community consultation

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this