Clips versus suture technique: Is there a difference?

T. Chughtai, L. Q. Chen, G. Salasidis, Dao Nguyen, C. Tchervenkov, J. F. Morin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is one of the most common procedures performed today, and wound complications are a major source of morbidity and cost. Objective: To determine whether there is any difference in wound outcome (including cost in a Canadian context) between a subcuticular suture technique and skin stapling technique for closure of sternal and leg incisions in CABG patients. Patients and methods: One hundred and sixty-two patients undergoing CABG were prospectively, randomly placed to have their sternal and leg incisions closed with either a subcuticular suture technique or with a skin clip. Data were obtained through chart review, in-hospital assessments and follow-up visits. Nonblinded assessments were made regarding wound leakage, inflammation, infection, necrosis, swelling, dehiscence and cosmesis. Each of the parameters was graded on a scale from 1 to 4. The cost was evaluated in Canadian dollars. Results: There were trends toward increased rates of inhospital sternal (P=0.09) and leg (P=0.17) incision inflammation when the wounds were closed with skin clips. There was a significantly greater (P=0.05) rate of sternal wound infection with clips, as well as a tendency (P=0.15) toward a greater rate of mediastinitis at follow-up assessment. Cosmetic outcome was similar for both groups. The cost incurred was significantly greater when skin clips were used for closure. There was a greater than threefold difference, which translates to a greater than $10,000 difference over one year. Conclusions: Closure with a subcuticular technique achieves better outcomes than the use of skin clips. When factoring in the increased cost incurred by using clips, as well as other intangible factors such as surgical skill acquisition, subcuticular suture closure appears to be a favourable method of wound closure in CABG patients compared with the use of skin stapling techniques.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1403-1407
Number of pages5
JournalCanadian Journal of Cardiology
Volume16
Issue number11
StatePublished - Dec 1 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Suture Techniques
Surgical Instruments
Coronary Artery Bypass
Skin
Costs and Cost Analysis
Wounds and Injuries
Leg
Inflammation
Mediastinitis
Wound Infection
Cosmetics
Sutures
Necrosis
Morbidity
Infection

Keywords

  • Bypass
  • Coronary disease
  • Cost-benefit analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Chughtai, T., Chen, L. Q., Salasidis, G., Nguyen, D., Tchervenkov, C., & Morin, J. F. (2000). Clips versus suture technique: Is there a difference? Canadian Journal of Cardiology, 16(11), 1403-1407.

Clips versus suture technique : Is there a difference? / Chughtai, T.; Chen, L. Q.; Salasidis, G.; Nguyen, Dao; Tchervenkov, C.; Morin, J. F.

In: Canadian Journal of Cardiology, Vol. 16, No. 11, 01.12.2000, p. 1403-1407.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chughtai, T, Chen, LQ, Salasidis, G, Nguyen, D, Tchervenkov, C & Morin, JF 2000, 'Clips versus suture technique: Is there a difference?', Canadian Journal of Cardiology, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 1403-1407.
Chughtai T, Chen LQ, Salasidis G, Nguyen D, Tchervenkov C, Morin JF. Clips versus suture technique: Is there a difference? Canadian Journal of Cardiology. 2000 Dec 1;16(11):1403-1407.
Chughtai, T. ; Chen, L. Q. ; Salasidis, G. ; Nguyen, Dao ; Tchervenkov, C. ; Morin, J. F. / Clips versus suture technique : Is there a difference?. In: Canadian Journal of Cardiology. 2000 ; Vol. 16, No. 11. pp. 1403-1407.
@article{160de2861e7545e4bc3a7b7bfd8a4d88,
title = "Clips versus suture technique: Is there a difference?",
abstract = "Introduction: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is one of the most common procedures performed today, and wound complications are a major source of morbidity and cost. Objective: To determine whether there is any difference in wound outcome (including cost in a Canadian context) between a subcuticular suture technique and skin stapling technique for closure of sternal and leg incisions in CABG patients. Patients and methods: One hundred and sixty-two patients undergoing CABG were prospectively, randomly placed to have their sternal and leg incisions closed with either a subcuticular suture technique or with a skin clip. Data were obtained through chart review, in-hospital assessments and follow-up visits. Nonblinded assessments were made regarding wound leakage, inflammation, infection, necrosis, swelling, dehiscence and cosmesis. Each of the parameters was graded on a scale from 1 to 4. The cost was evaluated in Canadian dollars. Results: There were trends toward increased rates of inhospital sternal (P=0.09) and leg (P=0.17) incision inflammation when the wounds were closed with skin clips. There was a significantly greater (P=0.05) rate of sternal wound infection with clips, as well as a tendency (P=0.15) toward a greater rate of mediastinitis at follow-up assessment. Cosmetic outcome was similar for both groups. The cost incurred was significantly greater when skin clips were used for closure. There was a greater than threefold difference, which translates to a greater than $10,000 difference over one year. Conclusions: Closure with a subcuticular technique achieves better outcomes than the use of skin clips. When factoring in the increased cost incurred by using clips, as well as other intangible factors such as surgical skill acquisition, subcuticular suture closure appears to be a favourable method of wound closure in CABG patients compared with the use of skin stapling techniques.",
keywords = "Bypass, Coronary disease, Cost-benefit analysis",
author = "T. Chughtai and Chen, {L. Q.} and G. Salasidis and Dao Nguyen and C. Tchervenkov and Morin, {J. F.}",
year = "2000",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "1403--1407",
journal = "Canadian Journal of Cardiology",
issn = "0828-282X",
publisher = "Pulsus Group Inc.",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clips versus suture technique

T2 - Is there a difference?

AU - Chughtai, T.

AU - Chen, L. Q.

AU - Salasidis, G.

AU - Nguyen, Dao

AU - Tchervenkov, C.

AU - Morin, J. F.

PY - 2000/12/1

Y1 - 2000/12/1

N2 - Introduction: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is one of the most common procedures performed today, and wound complications are a major source of morbidity and cost. Objective: To determine whether there is any difference in wound outcome (including cost in a Canadian context) between a subcuticular suture technique and skin stapling technique for closure of sternal and leg incisions in CABG patients. Patients and methods: One hundred and sixty-two patients undergoing CABG were prospectively, randomly placed to have their sternal and leg incisions closed with either a subcuticular suture technique or with a skin clip. Data were obtained through chart review, in-hospital assessments and follow-up visits. Nonblinded assessments were made regarding wound leakage, inflammation, infection, necrosis, swelling, dehiscence and cosmesis. Each of the parameters was graded on a scale from 1 to 4. The cost was evaluated in Canadian dollars. Results: There were trends toward increased rates of inhospital sternal (P=0.09) and leg (P=0.17) incision inflammation when the wounds were closed with skin clips. There was a significantly greater (P=0.05) rate of sternal wound infection with clips, as well as a tendency (P=0.15) toward a greater rate of mediastinitis at follow-up assessment. Cosmetic outcome was similar for both groups. The cost incurred was significantly greater when skin clips were used for closure. There was a greater than threefold difference, which translates to a greater than $10,000 difference over one year. Conclusions: Closure with a subcuticular technique achieves better outcomes than the use of skin clips. When factoring in the increased cost incurred by using clips, as well as other intangible factors such as surgical skill acquisition, subcuticular suture closure appears to be a favourable method of wound closure in CABG patients compared with the use of skin stapling techniques.

AB - Introduction: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is one of the most common procedures performed today, and wound complications are a major source of morbidity and cost. Objective: To determine whether there is any difference in wound outcome (including cost in a Canadian context) between a subcuticular suture technique and skin stapling technique for closure of sternal and leg incisions in CABG patients. Patients and methods: One hundred and sixty-two patients undergoing CABG were prospectively, randomly placed to have their sternal and leg incisions closed with either a subcuticular suture technique or with a skin clip. Data were obtained through chart review, in-hospital assessments and follow-up visits. Nonblinded assessments were made regarding wound leakage, inflammation, infection, necrosis, swelling, dehiscence and cosmesis. Each of the parameters was graded on a scale from 1 to 4. The cost was evaluated in Canadian dollars. Results: There were trends toward increased rates of inhospital sternal (P=0.09) and leg (P=0.17) incision inflammation when the wounds were closed with skin clips. There was a significantly greater (P=0.05) rate of sternal wound infection with clips, as well as a tendency (P=0.15) toward a greater rate of mediastinitis at follow-up assessment. Cosmetic outcome was similar for both groups. The cost incurred was significantly greater when skin clips were used for closure. There was a greater than threefold difference, which translates to a greater than $10,000 difference over one year. Conclusions: Closure with a subcuticular technique achieves better outcomes than the use of skin clips. When factoring in the increased cost incurred by using clips, as well as other intangible factors such as surgical skill acquisition, subcuticular suture closure appears to be a favourable method of wound closure in CABG patients compared with the use of skin stapling techniques.

KW - Bypass

KW - Coronary disease

KW - Cost-benefit analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034500085&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034500085&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 11109037

AN - SCOPUS:0034500085

VL - 16

SP - 1403

EP - 1407

JO - Canadian Journal of Cardiology

JF - Canadian Journal of Cardiology

SN - 0828-282X

IS - 11

ER -