TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinician approaches to communicating a dementia diagnosis
T2 - An interview study
AU - Wollney, Easton N.
AU - Bylund, Carma L.
AU - Bedenfield, Noheli
AU - Rosselli, Monica
AU - Curiel-Cid, Rosie E.
AU - Kitaigorodsky, Marcela
AU - Levy, Ximena
AU - Armstrong, Melissa J.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding:Workonthismanuscriptwassupported bytheFloridaDepartmentofHealth,PublicHealth Research,BiomedicalResearchProgram(grant 20A08,Co-PI’sMelissaArmstrong&Carma Bylund)andusedresourcesprovidedbyUniversity ofFloridaClinicalandTranslationalScience Institute,whichissupportedinpartbytheNIH NationalCenterforAdvancingTranslational
Funding Information:
Work on this manuscript was supported by the Florida Department of Health, Public Health Research, Biomedical Research Program (grant 20A08, Co-PI's Melissa Armstrong & Carma Bylund) and used resources provided by University of Florida Clinical and Translational Science Institute, which is supported in part by the NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences under award number UL1TR001427. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Florida Department of Health or National Institutes of Health. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Funder URLs: http://www. floridahealth.gov/provider-and-partner-resources/ research/funding-opportunity-announcements/ alzheimersfoa.html https://ncats.nih.gov/.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Wollney et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
PY - 2022/4
Y1 - 2022/4
N2 - Background Individuals with cognitive impairment and their families place a high value on receiving a dementia diagnosis, but clinician approaches vary. There is a need for research investigating experiences of giving and receiving dementia diagnoses. The current study aimed to investigate clinician approaches to giving dementia diagnoses as part of a larger study investigating patient, caregiver, and clinician experiences during the diagnosis encounter. Method Investigators conducted telephone interviews with Florida-based clinicians who give dementia diagnoses either rarely or commonly. Interviews employed a semi-structured interview guide querying communication practices used by clinicians when giving dementia diagnoses and how clinicians learned to give dementia diagnoses. Investigators used a descriptive qualitative design to conduct a thematic analysis of data. Results Fifteen Florida-based clinicians participated, representing diverse backgrounds related to gender, race/ethnicity, specialty, and practice setting. Participants reported using patientand family-centered communication practices including checking patient understanding, communicating empathically, and involving family members. Some clinicians explicitly asked patients and/or family members about their preferences regarding diagnosis disclosure; many clinicians tailored their disclosure based on patient and family characteristics or reactions. Some clinicians reported using specific diagnoses, while others used general terms such as "memory disorder."Clinicians reported positively framing information, including instilling hope, focusing on healthy behaviors, and discussing symptom management. Finally, clinicians provided patient/family education and arranged follow up. Clinicians reported learning approaches to dementia diagnosis disclosure through formal training and self-education. Conclusions Diverse Florida-based clinicians described dementia disclosure practices largely consistent with published guidance, but clinicians varied on approaches relating to soliciting patient disclosure preferences and terminology used. Clinicians caring for diverse populations described that cultural background affects the disclosure process, but more research is needed regarding this finding and best practices for individuals from different backgrounds.
AB - Background Individuals with cognitive impairment and their families place a high value on receiving a dementia diagnosis, but clinician approaches vary. There is a need for research investigating experiences of giving and receiving dementia diagnoses. The current study aimed to investigate clinician approaches to giving dementia diagnoses as part of a larger study investigating patient, caregiver, and clinician experiences during the diagnosis encounter. Method Investigators conducted telephone interviews with Florida-based clinicians who give dementia diagnoses either rarely or commonly. Interviews employed a semi-structured interview guide querying communication practices used by clinicians when giving dementia diagnoses and how clinicians learned to give dementia diagnoses. Investigators used a descriptive qualitative design to conduct a thematic analysis of data. Results Fifteen Florida-based clinicians participated, representing diverse backgrounds related to gender, race/ethnicity, specialty, and practice setting. Participants reported using patientand family-centered communication practices including checking patient understanding, communicating empathically, and involving family members. Some clinicians explicitly asked patients and/or family members about their preferences regarding diagnosis disclosure; many clinicians tailored their disclosure based on patient and family characteristics or reactions. Some clinicians reported using specific diagnoses, while others used general terms such as "memory disorder."Clinicians reported positively framing information, including instilling hope, focusing on healthy behaviors, and discussing symptom management. Finally, clinicians provided patient/family education and arranged follow up. Clinicians reported learning approaches to dementia diagnosis disclosure through formal training and self-education. Conclusions Diverse Florida-based clinicians described dementia disclosure practices largely consistent with published guidance, but clinicians varied on approaches relating to soliciting patient disclosure preferences and terminology used. Clinicians caring for diverse populations described that cultural background affects the disclosure process, but more research is needed regarding this finding and best practices for individuals from different backgrounds.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85128327471&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85128327471&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0267161
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0267161
M3 - Article
C2 - 35421205
AN - SCOPUS:85128327471
VL - 17
JO - PLoS One
JF - PLoS One
SN - 1932-6203
IS - 4 April
M1 - e0267161
ER -