Clinical interventions for venous leg ulcers: Proposals to improve the quality of clinical leg ulcer research

Gerald S. Lazarus, Robert Kirsner, Jonathan Zenilman, M. Frances Valle, David J. Margolis, Nicky Cullum, Vickie R. Driver, Lisa Gould, Ellie Lindsay, Sean Tunis, William Marston, Eric Bass, William Ennis, Jeffrey Davidson, Jeremy Bowden

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The present status of clinical leg ulcer healing research was reviewed by 25 experts over 2 days on September 28 and 29, 2015. Multiple clinical effectiveness reviews were presented suggesting that published clinical wound healing research often does not meet present (2015) evidence based standards. Specific areas requiring remediation were highlighted and approaches to overcoming existing challenges were proposed. Participants using anonymous voting technology developed an action plan to resolve perceived deficiencies. Statements were accepted if 75% of participants agreed. Older patients with a high frequency of comorbid conditions posed particular difficulties in designing clinical research protocols and better diagnostic categorization is necessary A standardized model template for collecting information about diagnosis and evaluation of the effect of interventions on healing of all types of leg ulcers was considered a high priority. Such a model template could be modified depending on the specific etiology of the leg ulcers. Generally agreed on quantifiable standards to establish degree of morbidity was considered a high priority. There was universal agreement that sources of funding and conflicts of interest needed to be disclosed in presentations and all publications. All clinical research studies should be registered with appropriate authorities. There was substantial enthusiasm for a clinical research network with quality standards for membership and an advisory research core available to investigators. Such a network should be funded and actively managed to insure long-term viability. The governance of such an entity needs to be established by the wound care community. The present trend to integrate patients into the clinical research process was endorsed and there was enthusiasm to develop patient advocacy for wound healing research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)767-774
Number of pages8
JournalWound Repair and Regeneration
Volume24
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2016

Fingerprint

Varicose Ulcer
Leg Ulcer
Research
Wound Healing
Patient Advocacy
Conflict of Interest
Politics
Clinical Protocols
Publications
Research Personnel
Technology
Morbidity
Wounds and Injuries

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Dermatology

Cite this

Clinical interventions for venous leg ulcers : Proposals to improve the quality of clinical leg ulcer research. / Lazarus, Gerald S.; Kirsner, Robert; Zenilman, Jonathan; Valle, M. Frances; Margolis, David J.; Cullum, Nicky; Driver, Vickie R.; Gould, Lisa; Lindsay, Ellie; Tunis, Sean; Marston, William; Bass, Eric; Ennis, William; Davidson, Jeffrey; Bowden, Jeremy.

In: Wound Repair and Regeneration, Vol. 24, No. 5, 01.09.2016, p. 767-774.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lazarus, GS, Kirsner, R, Zenilman, J, Valle, MF, Margolis, DJ, Cullum, N, Driver, VR, Gould, L, Lindsay, E, Tunis, S, Marston, W, Bass, E, Ennis, W, Davidson, J & Bowden, J 2016, 'Clinical interventions for venous leg ulcers: Proposals to improve the quality of clinical leg ulcer research', Wound Repair and Regeneration, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 767-774. https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.12466
Lazarus, Gerald S. ; Kirsner, Robert ; Zenilman, Jonathan ; Valle, M. Frances ; Margolis, David J. ; Cullum, Nicky ; Driver, Vickie R. ; Gould, Lisa ; Lindsay, Ellie ; Tunis, Sean ; Marston, William ; Bass, Eric ; Ennis, William ; Davidson, Jeffrey ; Bowden, Jeremy. / Clinical interventions for venous leg ulcers : Proposals to improve the quality of clinical leg ulcer research. In: Wound Repair and Regeneration. 2016 ; Vol. 24, No. 5. pp. 767-774.
@article{5db82b538b404ff99df9c7286d02594f,
title = "Clinical interventions for venous leg ulcers: Proposals to improve the quality of clinical leg ulcer research",
abstract = "The present status of clinical leg ulcer healing research was reviewed by 25 experts over 2 days on September 28 and 29, 2015. Multiple clinical effectiveness reviews were presented suggesting that published clinical wound healing research often does not meet present (2015) evidence based standards. Specific areas requiring remediation were highlighted and approaches to overcoming existing challenges were proposed. Participants using anonymous voting technology developed an action plan to resolve perceived deficiencies. Statements were accepted if 75{\%} of participants agreed. Older patients with a high frequency of comorbid conditions posed particular difficulties in designing clinical research protocols and better diagnostic categorization is necessary A standardized model template for collecting information about diagnosis and evaluation of the effect of interventions on healing of all types of leg ulcers was considered a high priority. Such a model template could be modified depending on the specific etiology of the leg ulcers. Generally agreed on quantifiable standards to establish degree of morbidity was considered a high priority. There was universal agreement that sources of funding and conflicts of interest needed to be disclosed in presentations and all publications. All clinical research studies should be registered with appropriate authorities. There was substantial enthusiasm for a clinical research network with quality standards for membership and an advisory research core available to investigators. Such a network should be funded and actively managed to insure long-term viability. The governance of such an entity needs to be established by the wound care community. The present trend to integrate patients into the clinical research process was endorsed and there was enthusiasm to develop patient advocacy for wound healing research.",
author = "Lazarus, {Gerald S.} and Robert Kirsner and Jonathan Zenilman and Valle, {M. Frances} and Margolis, {David J.} and Nicky Cullum and Driver, {Vickie R.} and Lisa Gould and Ellie Lindsay and Sean Tunis and William Marston and Eric Bass and William Ennis and Jeffrey Davidson and Jeremy Bowden",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/wrr.12466",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "767--774",
journal = "Wound Repair and Regeneration",
issn = "1067-1927",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical interventions for venous leg ulcers

T2 - Proposals to improve the quality of clinical leg ulcer research

AU - Lazarus, Gerald S.

AU - Kirsner, Robert

AU - Zenilman, Jonathan

AU - Valle, M. Frances

AU - Margolis, David J.

AU - Cullum, Nicky

AU - Driver, Vickie R.

AU - Gould, Lisa

AU - Lindsay, Ellie

AU - Tunis, Sean

AU - Marston, William

AU - Bass, Eric

AU - Ennis, William

AU - Davidson, Jeffrey

AU - Bowden, Jeremy

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - The present status of clinical leg ulcer healing research was reviewed by 25 experts over 2 days on September 28 and 29, 2015. Multiple clinical effectiveness reviews were presented suggesting that published clinical wound healing research often does not meet present (2015) evidence based standards. Specific areas requiring remediation were highlighted and approaches to overcoming existing challenges were proposed. Participants using anonymous voting technology developed an action plan to resolve perceived deficiencies. Statements were accepted if 75% of participants agreed. Older patients with a high frequency of comorbid conditions posed particular difficulties in designing clinical research protocols and better diagnostic categorization is necessary A standardized model template for collecting information about diagnosis and evaluation of the effect of interventions on healing of all types of leg ulcers was considered a high priority. Such a model template could be modified depending on the specific etiology of the leg ulcers. Generally agreed on quantifiable standards to establish degree of morbidity was considered a high priority. There was universal agreement that sources of funding and conflicts of interest needed to be disclosed in presentations and all publications. All clinical research studies should be registered with appropriate authorities. There was substantial enthusiasm for a clinical research network with quality standards for membership and an advisory research core available to investigators. Such a network should be funded and actively managed to insure long-term viability. The governance of such an entity needs to be established by the wound care community. The present trend to integrate patients into the clinical research process was endorsed and there was enthusiasm to develop patient advocacy for wound healing research.

AB - The present status of clinical leg ulcer healing research was reviewed by 25 experts over 2 days on September 28 and 29, 2015. Multiple clinical effectiveness reviews were presented suggesting that published clinical wound healing research often does not meet present (2015) evidence based standards. Specific areas requiring remediation were highlighted and approaches to overcoming existing challenges were proposed. Participants using anonymous voting technology developed an action plan to resolve perceived deficiencies. Statements were accepted if 75% of participants agreed. Older patients with a high frequency of comorbid conditions posed particular difficulties in designing clinical research protocols and better diagnostic categorization is necessary A standardized model template for collecting information about diagnosis and evaluation of the effect of interventions on healing of all types of leg ulcers was considered a high priority. Such a model template could be modified depending on the specific etiology of the leg ulcers. Generally agreed on quantifiable standards to establish degree of morbidity was considered a high priority. There was universal agreement that sources of funding and conflicts of interest needed to be disclosed in presentations and all publications. All clinical research studies should be registered with appropriate authorities. There was substantial enthusiasm for a clinical research network with quality standards for membership and an advisory research core available to investigators. Such a network should be funded and actively managed to insure long-term viability. The governance of such an entity needs to be established by the wound care community. The present trend to integrate patients into the clinical research process was endorsed and there was enthusiasm to develop patient advocacy for wound healing research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84988964882&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84988964882&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/wrr.12466

DO - 10.1111/wrr.12466

M3 - Article

C2 - 27487792

AN - SCOPUS:84988964882

VL - 24

SP - 767

EP - 774

JO - Wound Repair and Regeneration

JF - Wound Repair and Regeneration

SN - 1067-1927

IS - 5

ER -