Clinical experience with multigene carrier panels in the reproductive setting

Catherine Terhaar, Nicole Teed, Rachel Allen, Lindsay Dohany, Christina Settler, Carol Holland, Ryan E. Longman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations


Objectives: Expanded carrier testing is acknowledged as an acceptable strategy for carrier testing by the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Limited studies have investigated positivity rates of expanded carrier panels. We describe our experience with 3 commercial laboratory panels varying in size from 3 to 218 disorders. Methods: We reviewed outcomes for 3 multigene carrier screening panels: trio (3 diseases), standard (23 diseases), and global (218 diseases). All panels used targeted genotype analysis of preselected mutations via next-generation sequencing. We calculated positivity rates for each panel. Results: Positivity rates were 7.2% for Preparent Trio, 13.2% for Preparent Standard, and 35.8% for Preparent Global. The most frequent positive results in the global panel were (in descending order): abnormal hemoglobin electrophoresis, familial Mediterranean fever, cystic fibrosis, fragile X, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency, alpha-thalassemia, and nonsyndromic hearing loss. Conclusions: While genetic diseases are individually rare, they are cumulatively common. Our experience illustrates that, with a panel of 218 diseases, the likelihood of identifying a carrier can be as high as 36%. Understanding panel positivity rates is one important factor for providers when choosing the right test for their practice, setting appropriate expectations for patients, and planning for follow-up counseling.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)572-577
Number of pages6
JournalPrenatal Diagnosis
Issue number8
StatePublished - Jul 2018

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Genetics(clinical)


Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical experience with multigene carrier panels in the reproductive setting'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this