Clinical evaluation of a fully automated model-based algorithm to calculate left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction using multidetector computed tomography

Eduard Ghersin, Sobhi Abadi, Sergey Yalonetsky, Ahuva Engel, Jonathan Lessick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate feasibility and accuracy of a fully automatic algorithm (FAA) for calculating left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction (LVEF) from multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) studies versus a previously validated method based on Simpson's method serving as our reference standard (RS), and left ventriculography (LVG), in patients with acute chest pain (ACP). Methods: 23 patients admitted with ACP underwent ECG-gated MDCT, as well as LVG during their hospitalization. MDCT based end-diastolic, end-systolic and stroke volumes (EDV, ESV, SV) and LVEF were calculated using the RS and the FAA. Results: One patient was excluded after FAA failure to detect contours. In the remaining 22 patients, meanSD LVEF measurements were RS 6111%, FAA 5911% (r = 0.91 versus RS), LVG 5716% (r = 0.6 versus RS). In comparison to RS, FAA overestimated EDV by 10.18.5 ml, ESV by 7.36.4 ml and SV by 3.68.6 ml, and underestimated LVEF measurements by 2.74.6%, related to contour smoothing. LVEF by FAA was within 8% of RS for all patients except one. In contrast, LVG differed significantly from RS. Conclusions: The evaluated FAA obtained accurate, clinically relevant results for left ventricular volumes and LVEF relative to the RS.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)43-51
Number of pages9
JournalAcute Cardiac Care
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2009

Fingerprint

Multidetector Computed Tomography
Stroke Volume
Acute Pain
Chest Pain
Electrocardiography
Hospitalization

Keywords

  • Acute coronary syndrome
  • Cardiac volume
  • Computed tomography
  • Imaging
  • Left ventricular function

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Clinical evaluation of a fully automated model-based algorithm to calculate left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction using multidetector computed tomography. / Ghersin, Eduard; Abadi, Sobhi; Yalonetsky, Sergey; Engel, Ahuva; Lessick, Jonathan.

In: Acute Cardiac Care, Vol. 11, No. 1, 01.04.2009, p. 43-51.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e8f5faf40bad4caeb86bbd6d5ab94704,
title = "Clinical evaluation of a fully automated model-based algorithm to calculate left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction using multidetector computed tomography",
abstract = "Objectives: To evaluate feasibility and accuracy of a fully automatic algorithm (FAA) for calculating left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction (LVEF) from multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) studies versus a previously validated method based on Simpson's method serving as our reference standard (RS), and left ventriculography (LVG), in patients with acute chest pain (ACP). Methods: 23 patients admitted with ACP underwent ECG-gated MDCT, as well as LVG during their hospitalization. MDCT based end-diastolic, end-systolic and stroke volumes (EDV, ESV, SV) and LVEF were calculated using the RS and the FAA. Results: One patient was excluded after FAA failure to detect contours. In the remaining 22 patients, meanSD LVEF measurements were RS 6111{\%}, FAA 5911{\%} (r = 0.91 versus RS), LVG 5716{\%} (r = 0.6 versus RS). In comparison to RS, FAA overestimated EDV by 10.18.5 ml, ESV by 7.36.4 ml and SV by 3.68.6 ml, and underestimated LVEF measurements by 2.74.6{\%}, related to contour smoothing. LVEF by FAA was within 8{\%} of RS for all patients except one. In contrast, LVG differed significantly from RS. Conclusions: The evaluated FAA obtained accurate, clinically relevant results for left ventricular volumes and LVEF relative to the RS.",
keywords = "Acute coronary syndrome, Cardiac volume, Computed tomography, Imaging, Left ventricular function",
author = "Eduard Ghersin and Sobhi Abadi and Sergey Yalonetsky and Ahuva Engel and Jonathan Lessick",
year = "2009",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/17482940802588317",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "43--51",
journal = "Acute Cardiac Care",
issn = "1748-2941",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical evaluation of a fully automated model-based algorithm to calculate left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction using multidetector computed tomography

AU - Ghersin, Eduard

AU - Abadi, Sobhi

AU - Yalonetsky, Sergey

AU - Engel, Ahuva

AU - Lessick, Jonathan

PY - 2009/4/1

Y1 - 2009/4/1

N2 - Objectives: To evaluate feasibility and accuracy of a fully automatic algorithm (FAA) for calculating left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction (LVEF) from multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) studies versus a previously validated method based on Simpson's method serving as our reference standard (RS), and left ventriculography (LVG), in patients with acute chest pain (ACP). Methods: 23 patients admitted with ACP underwent ECG-gated MDCT, as well as LVG during their hospitalization. MDCT based end-diastolic, end-systolic and stroke volumes (EDV, ESV, SV) and LVEF were calculated using the RS and the FAA. Results: One patient was excluded after FAA failure to detect contours. In the remaining 22 patients, meanSD LVEF measurements were RS 6111%, FAA 5911% (r = 0.91 versus RS), LVG 5716% (r = 0.6 versus RS). In comparison to RS, FAA overestimated EDV by 10.18.5 ml, ESV by 7.36.4 ml and SV by 3.68.6 ml, and underestimated LVEF measurements by 2.74.6%, related to contour smoothing. LVEF by FAA was within 8% of RS for all patients except one. In contrast, LVG differed significantly from RS. Conclusions: The evaluated FAA obtained accurate, clinically relevant results for left ventricular volumes and LVEF relative to the RS.

AB - Objectives: To evaluate feasibility and accuracy of a fully automatic algorithm (FAA) for calculating left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction (LVEF) from multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) studies versus a previously validated method based on Simpson's method serving as our reference standard (RS), and left ventriculography (LVG), in patients with acute chest pain (ACP). Methods: 23 patients admitted with ACP underwent ECG-gated MDCT, as well as LVG during their hospitalization. MDCT based end-diastolic, end-systolic and stroke volumes (EDV, ESV, SV) and LVEF were calculated using the RS and the FAA. Results: One patient was excluded after FAA failure to detect contours. In the remaining 22 patients, meanSD LVEF measurements were RS 6111%, FAA 5911% (r = 0.91 versus RS), LVG 5716% (r = 0.6 versus RS). In comparison to RS, FAA overestimated EDV by 10.18.5 ml, ESV by 7.36.4 ml and SV by 3.68.6 ml, and underestimated LVEF measurements by 2.74.6%, related to contour smoothing. LVEF by FAA was within 8% of RS for all patients except one. In contrast, LVG differed significantly from RS. Conclusions: The evaluated FAA obtained accurate, clinically relevant results for left ventricular volumes and LVEF relative to the RS.

KW - Acute coronary syndrome

KW - Cardiac volume

KW - Computed tomography

KW - Imaging

KW - Left ventricular function

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67049109140&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67049109140&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/17482940802588317

DO - 10.1080/17482940802588317

M3 - Article

C2 - 19396643

AN - SCOPUS:67049109140

VL - 11

SP - 43

EP - 51

JO - Acute Cardiac Care

JF - Acute Cardiac Care

SN - 1748-2941

IS - 1

ER -