Client and Provider Perspectives on Quality of Care: A Systematic Review

Jessica Williams, Loretta E. Gavin, Marion W. Carter, Evelyn Glass

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Context A central premise of the literature on healthcare quality is that improving the quality of care will lead to improvements in health outcomes. A systematic review was conducted to better inform quality improvement efforts in the area of family planning. The objective of this systematic review is to update a previous review focused on the quality of family planning services, namely, the impact of quality improvement efforts and client perspectives about what constitutes quality family planning services. In addition, this review includes new literature examining provider perspectives. Evidence acquisition Multiple databases from January 1985 through January 2015 were searched within the peer-reviewed literature that described the quality of family planning services. The retrieval and inclusion criteria included full-length articles published in English, which described studies occurring in a clinic-based setting to include family planning services. Evidence synthesis Search strategies identified 16,145 articles, 16 of which met the inclusion criteria. No new intervention studies addressing the impact of quality improvement efforts on family planning outcomes were identified. Sixteen articles provided information relevant to client or provider perspectives about what constitutes quality family planning services. Clients and providers mostly identified the need for services that were accessible, client-centered, and equitable. Themes related to effectiveness, efficiency, and safety were mentioned less frequently. Conclusions Family planning services that account for both patient and provider perspectives may be more effective. Further research is needed to examine the impact of improved quality on provider practices, client behavior, and health outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)S93-S106
JournalAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine
Volume49
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2015

Fingerprint

Quality of Health Care
Family Planning Services
Quality Improvement
Health
Databases
Safety
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Epidemiology

Cite this

Client and Provider Perspectives on Quality of Care : A Systematic Review. / Williams, Jessica; Gavin, Loretta E.; Carter, Marion W.; Glass, Evelyn.

In: American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Vol. 49, No. 2, 01.08.2015, p. S93-S106.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Williams, Jessica ; Gavin, Loretta E. ; Carter, Marion W. ; Glass, Evelyn. / Client and Provider Perspectives on Quality of Care : A Systematic Review. In: American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2015 ; Vol. 49, No. 2. pp. S93-S106.
@article{0d69130d6c9d428db729126af6b3a0ec,
title = "Client and Provider Perspectives on Quality of Care: A Systematic Review",
abstract = "Context A central premise of the literature on healthcare quality is that improving the quality of care will lead to improvements in health outcomes. A systematic review was conducted to better inform quality improvement efforts in the area of family planning. The objective of this systematic review is to update a previous review focused on the quality of family planning services, namely, the impact of quality improvement efforts and client perspectives about what constitutes quality family planning services. In addition, this review includes new literature examining provider perspectives. Evidence acquisition Multiple databases from January 1985 through January 2015 were searched within the peer-reviewed literature that described the quality of family planning services. The retrieval and inclusion criteria included full-length articles published in English, which described studies occurring in a clinic-based setting to include family planning services. Evidence synthesis Search strategies identified 16,145 articles, 16 of which met the inclusion criteria. No new intervention studies addressing the impact of quality improvement efforts on family planning outcomes were identified. Sixteen articles provided information relevant to client or provider perspectives about what constitutes quality family planning services. Clients and providers mostly identified the need for services that were accessible, client-centered, and equitable. Themes related to effectiveness, efficiency, and safety were mentioned less frequently. Conclusions Family planning services that account for both patient and provider perspectives may be more effective. Further research is needed to examine the impact of improved quality on provider practices, client behavior, and health outcomes.",
author = "Jessica Williams and Gavin, {Loretta E.} and Carter, {Marion W.} and Evelyn Glass",
year = "2015",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.amepre.2015.03.017",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
pages = "S93--S106",
journal = "American Journal of Preventive Medicine",
issn = "0749-3797",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Client and Provider Perspectives on Quality of Care

T2 - A Systematic Review

AU - Williams, Jessica

AU - Gavin, Loretta E.

AU - Carter, Marion W.

AU - Glass, Evelyn

PY - 2015/8/1

Y1 - 2015/8/1

N2 - Context A central premise of the literature on healthcare quality is that improving the quality of care will lead to improvements in health outcomes. A systematic review was conducted to better inform quality improvement efforts in the area of family planning. The objective of this systematic review is to update a previous review focused on the quality of family planning services, namely, the impact of quality improvement efforts and client perspectives about what constitutes quality family planning services. In addition, this review includes new literature examining provider perspectives. Evidence acquisition Multiple databases from January 1985 through January 2015 were searched within the peer-reviewed literature that described the quality of family planning services. The retrieval and inclusion criteria included full-length articles published in English, which described studies occurring in a clinic-based setting to include family planning services. Evidence synthesis Search strategies identified 16,145 articles, 16 of which met the inclusion criteria. No new intervention studies addressing the impact of quality improvement efforts on family planning outcomes were identified. Sixteen articles provided information relevant to client or provider perspectives about what constitutes quality family planning services. Clients and providers mostly identified the need for services that were accessible, client-centered, and equitable. Themes related to effectiveness, efficiency, and safety were mentioned less frequently. Conclusions Family planning services that account for both patient and provider perspectives may be more effective. Further research is needed to examine the impact of improved quality on provider practices, client behavior, and health outcomes.

AB - Context A central premise of the literature on healthcare quality is that improving the quality of care will lead to improvements in health outcomes. A systematic review was conducted to better inform quality improvement efforts in the area of family planning. The objective of this systematic review is to update a previous review focused on the quality of family planning services, namely, the impact of quality improvement efforts and client perspectives about what constitutes quality family planning services. In addition, this review includes new literature examining provider perspectives. Evidence acquisition Multiple databases from January 1985 through January 2015 were searched within the peer-reviewed literature that described the quality of family planning services. The retrieval and inclusion criteria included full-length articles published in English, which described studies occurring in a clinic-based setting to include family planning services. Evidence synthesis Search strategies identified 16,145 articles, 16 of which met the inclusion criteria. No new intervention studies addressing the impact of quality improvement efforts on family planning outcomes were identified. Sixteen articles provided information relevant to client or provider perspectives about what constitutes quality family planning services. Clients and providers mostly identified the need for services that were accessible, client-centered, and equitable. Themes related to effectiveness, efficiency, and safety were mentioned less frequently. Conclusions Family planning services that account for both patient and provider perspectives may be more effective. Further research is needed to examine the impact of improved quality on provider practices, client behavior, and health outcomes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937399284&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937399284&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.03.017

DO - 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.03.017

M3 - Article

C2 - 26190852

AN - SCOPUS:84937399284

VL - 49

SP - S93-S106

JO - American Journal of Preventive Medicine

JF - American Journal of Preventive Medicine

SN - 0749-3797

IS - 2

ER -