Citizenship and immigration law, 1800-1924: Resolutions of membership and territory

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The paradigmatic function of a national immigration regime is to defend a territorial inside from a territorial outside. Access to and presence within this territorial inside are determined on the basis of whether one is a “citizen” or an “alien,” where both terms are understood in their formal legal sense. All of the activities we associate with the contemporary U.S. immigration regime – exclusion and deportation, entry checkpoints, border patrols, detention centers, and the like – make sense in these terms. Liberal American theorists have provided powerful moral justifications for this defense of the territorial inside from the territorial outside on the ground that it is only in this way that the coherence of a national community on the inside can be preserved and fostered. In this rendering, the coherence of the national community may not take the form of an oppressive <italic>Blut und Boden</italic> nationalism. Rather, the territorial inside must be a homogeneous space of rights enjoyed by all insiders. Although most of these insiders will be citizens, resident immigrants will be treated fairly and given a reasonable opportunity to become citizens. The very coherence of the territorial inside as a homogeneous space of rights justifies immigration restriction. Outsiders – who are imagined as citizens of other countries – have no morally binding claim to be admitted to the inside. This theoretical rendering of the activities of the national immigration regime is the product of recent history. For the first century of the United States’ existence as a nation (from the American Revolution until the 1870s), a national immigration regime that regulated individuals’ access to, and presence within, national territory on the basis of their national citizenship simply did not exist.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe Cambridge History of Law in America
Subtitle of host publicationVolume II the Long Nineteenth Century (1789-1920)
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages168-203
Number of pages36
ISBN (Electronic)9781139054188
ISBN (Print)9780521803069
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Citizenship
Immigration
Rendering
Exclusion
Deportation
US Immigration
American Revolution
Nationalism
Theorists
Paradigmatics
Outsider
Immigrants
Residents
Detention
Moral Justification
History
1870s

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

Parker, K. (2008). Citizenship and immigration law, 1800-1924: Resolutions of membership and territory. In The Cambridge History of Law in America: Volume II the Long Nineteenth Century (1789-1920) (pp. 168-203). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521803069.007

Citizenship and immigration law, 1800-1924 : Resolutions of membership and territory. / Parker, Kunal.

The Cambridge History of Law in America: Volume II the Long Nineteenth Century (1789-1920). Cambridge University Press, 2008. p. 168-203.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Parker, K 2008, Citizenship and immigration law, 1800-1924: Resolutions of membership and territory. in The Cambridge History of Law in America: Volume II the Long Nineteenth Century (1789-1920). Cambridge University Press, pp. 168-203. https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521803069.007
Parker K. Citizenship and immigration law, 1800-1924: Resolutions of membership and territory. In The Cambridge History of Law in America: Volume II the Long Nineteenth Century (1789-1920). Cambridge University Press. 2008. p. 168-203 https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521803069.007
Parker, Kunal. / Citizenship and immigration law, 1800-1924 : Resolutions of membership and territory. The Cambridge History of Law in America: Volume II the Long Nineteenth Century (1789-1920). Cambridge University Press, 2008. pp. 168-203
@inbook{984ee08c823d48edabf7380e2ad1c0c5,
title = "Citizenship and immigration law, 1800-1924: Resolutions of membership and territory",
abstract = "The paradigmatic function of a national immigration regime is to defend a territorial inside from a territorial outside. Access to and presence within this territorial inside are determined on the basis of whether one is a “citizen” or an “alien,” where both terms are understood in their formal legal sense. All of the activities we associate with the contemporary U.S. immigration regime – exclusion and deportation, entry checkpoints, border patrols, detention centers, and the like – make sense in these terms. Liberal American theorists have provided powerful moral justifications for this defense of the territorial inside from the territorial outside on the ground that it is only in this way that the coherence of a national community on the inside can be preserved and fostered. In this rendering, the coherence of the national community may not take the form of an oppressive Blut und Boden nationalism. Rather, the territorial inside must be a homogeneous space of rights enjoyed by all insiders. Although most of these insiders will be citizens, resident immigrants will be treated fairly and given a reasonable opportunity to become citizens. The very coherence of the territorial inside as a homogeneous space of rights justifies immigration restriction. Outsiders – who are imagined as citizens of other countries – have no morally binding claim to be admitted to the inside. This theoretical rendering of the activities of the national immigration regime is the product of recent history. For the first century of the United States’ existence as a nation (from the American Revolution until the 1870s), a national immigration regime that regulated individuals’ access to, and presence within, national territory on the basis of their national citizenship simply did not exist.",
author = "Kunal Parker",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CHOL9780521803069.007",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780521803069",
pages = "168--203",
booktitle = "The Cambridge History of Law in America",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
address = "United States",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Citizenship and immigration law, 1800-1924

T2 - Resolutions of membership and territory

AU - Parker, Kunal

PY - 2008/1/1

Y1 - 2008/1/1

N2 - The paradigmatic function of a national immigration regime is to defend a territorial inside from a territorial outside. Access to and presence within this territorial inside are determined on the basis of whether one is a “citizen” or an “alien,” where both terms are understood in their formal legal sense. All of the activities we associate with the contemporary U.S. immigration regime – exclusion and deportation, entry checkpoints, border patrols, detention centers, and the like – make sense in these terms. Liberal American theorists have provided powerful moral justifications for this defense of the territorial inside from the territorial outside on the ground that it is only in this way that the coherence of a national community on the inside can be preserved and fostered. In this rendering, the coherence of the national community may not take the form of an oppressive Blut und Boden nationalism. Rather, the territorial inside must be a homogeneous space of rights enjoyed by all insiders. Although most of these insiders will be citizens, resident immigrants will be treated fairly and given a reasonable opportunity to become citizens. The very coherence of the territorial inside as a homogeneous space of rights justifies immigration restriction. Outsiders – who are imagined as citizens of other countries – have no morally binding claim to be admitted to the inside. This theoretical rendering of the activities of the national immigration regime is the product of recent history. For the first century of the United States’ existence as a nation (from the American Revolution until the 1870s), a national immigration regime that regulated individuals’ access to, and presence within, national territory on the basis of their national citizenship simply did not exist.

AB - The paradigmatic function of a national immigration regime is to defend a territorial inside from a territorial outside. Access to and presence within this territorial inside are determined on the basis of whether one is a “citizen” or an “alien,” where both terms are understood in their formal legal sense. All of the activities we associate with the contemporary U.S. immigration regime – exclusion and deportation, entry checkpoints, border patrols, detention centers, and the like – make sense in these terms. Liberal American theorists have provided powerful moral justifications for this defense of the territorial inside from the territorial outside on the ground that it is only in this way that the coherence of a national community on the inside can be preserved and fostered. In this rendering, the coherence of the national community may not take the form of an oppressive Blut und Boden nationalism. Rather, the territorial inside must be a homogeneous space of rights enjoyed by all insiders. Although most of these insiders will be citizens, resident immigrants will be treated fairly and given a reasonable opportunity to become citizens. The very coherence of the territorial inside as a homogeneous space of rights justifies immigration restriction. Outsiders – who are imagined as citizens of other countries – have no morally binding claim to be admitted to the inside. This theoretical rendering of the activities of the national immigration regime is the product of recent history. For the first century of the United States’ existence as a nation (from the American Revolution until the 1870s), a national immigration regime that regulated individuals’ access to, and presence within, national territory on the basis of their national citizenship simply did not exist.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923938812&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84923938812&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CHOL9780521803069.007

DO - 10.1017/CHOL9780521803069.007

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84923938812

SN - 9780521803069

SP - 168

EP - 203

BT - The Cambridge History of Law in America

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -