Chemical and physical exposures in the emerging US green-collar workforce

Charles J. Chen, Kevin J. Moore, Cristina A. Fernandez, Kristopher Arheart, William G. LeBlanc, Manuel Cifuentes, Laura A. McClure, Sharon L. Christ, Lora E. Fleming, David J Lee, Alberto J Caban-Martinez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: "Green collar" workers serve in occupations that directly improve environmental quality and sustainability. This study estimates and compares the prevalence of select physical and chemical exposures among green versus non-green U.S. workers. Methods: Data from the U.S. 2010 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) Occupational Health Supplement were linked to the Occupational Information Network (O-NET) Database. We examined four main exposures: 1) vapors, gas, dust, fumes (VGDF); 2) secondhand tobacco smoke; 3) skin hazards; 4) outdoor work. Results: Green-collar workers were significantly more likely to report exposure to VGDF and outdoor work than nongreen-collar workers [adjusted odds ratio (AOR)=1.25; 95% CI=1.11 to 1.40; AOR=1.44 (1.26 to 1.63), respectively]. Green-collar workers were less likely to be exposed to chemicals (AOR=0.80; 0.69 to 0.92). Conclusions: Green-collar workers appear to be at a greater risk for select workplace exposures. As the green industry continues to grow, it is important to identify these occupational hazards in order to maximize worker health.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)e91-e96
JournalJournal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Volume59
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Odds Ratio
Dust
Gases
Tobacco Smoke Pollution
Information Services
Occupational Health
Health Surveys
Occupations
Workplace
Tobacco
Industry
Databases
Interviews
Skin
Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Chemical and physical exposures in the emerging US green-collar workforce. / Chen, Charles J.; Moore, Kevin J.; Fernandez, Cristina A.; Arheart, Kristopher; LeBlanc, William G.; Cifuentes, Manuel; McClure, Laura A.; Christ, Sharon L.; Fleming, Lora E.; Lee, David J; Caban-Martinez, Alberto J.

In: Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Vol. 59, No. 5, 2017, p. e91-e96.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chen, CJ, Moore, KJ, Fernandez, CA, Arheart, K, LeBlanc, WG, Cifuentes, M, McClure, LA, Christ, SL, Fleming, LE, Lee, DJ & Caban-Martinez, AJ 2017, 'Chemical and physical exposures in the emerging US green-collar workforce', Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. e91-e96. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000001004
Chen, Charles J. ; Moore, Kevin J. ; Fernandez, Cristina A. ; Arheart, Kristopher ; LeBlanc, William G. ; Cifuentes, Manuel ; McClure, Laura A. ; Christ, Sharon L. ; Fleming, Lora E. ; Lee, David J ; Caban-Martinez, Alberto J. / Chemical and physical exposures in the emerging US green-collar workforce. In: Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2017 ; Vol. 59, No. 5. pp. e91-e96.
@article{ad0e9bddee634be4b544672d6d3d7c35,
title = "Chemical and physical exposures in the emerging US green-collar workforce",
abstract = "Objective: {"}Green collar{"} workers serve in occupations that directly improve environmental quality and sustainability. This study estimates and compares the prevalence of select physical and chemical exposures among green versus non-green U.S. workers. Methods: Data from the U.S. 2010 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) Occupational Health Supplement were linked to the Occupational Information Network (O-NET) Database. We examined four main exposures: 1) vapors, gas, dust, fumes (VGDF); 2) secondhand tobacco smoke; 3) skin hazards; 4) outdoor work. Results: Green-collar workers were significantly more likely to report exposure to VGDF and outdoor work than nongreen-collar workers [adjusted odds ratio (AOR)=1.25; 95{\%} CI=1.11 to 1.40; AOR=1.44 (1.26 to 1.63), respectively]. Green-collar workers were less likely to be exposed to chemicals (AOR=0.80; 0.69 to 0.92). Conclusions: Green-collar workers appear to be at a greater risk for select workplace exposures. As the green industry continues to grow, it is important to identify these occupational hazards in order to maximize worker health.",
author = "Chen, {Charles J.} and Moore, {Kevin J.} and Fernandez, {Cristina A.} and Kristopher Arheart and LeBlanc, {William G.} and Manuel Cifuentes and McClure, {Laura A.} and Christ, {Sharon L.} and Fleming, {Lora E.} and Lee, {David J} and Caban-Martinez, {Alberto J}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1097/JOM.0000000000001004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "59",
pages = "e91--e96",
journal = "Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine",
issn = "1076-2752",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Chemical and physical exposures in the emerging US green-collar workforce

AU - Chen, Charles J.

AU - Moore, Kevin J.

AU - Fernandez, Cristina A.

AU - Arheart, Kristopher

AU - LeBlanc, William G.

AU - Cifuentes, Manuel

AU - McClure, Laura A.

AU - Christ, Sharon L.

AU - Fleming, Lora E.

AU - Lee, David J

AU - Caban-Martinez, Alberto J

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Objective: "Green collar" workers serve in occupations that directly improve environmental quality and sustainability. This study estimates and compares the prevalence of select physical and chemical exposures among green versus non-green U.S. workers. Methods: Data from the U.S. 2010 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) Occupational Health Supplement were linked to the Occupational Information Network (O-NET) Database. We examined four main exposures: 1) vapors, gas, dust, fumes (VGDF); 2) secondhand tobacco smoke; 3) skin hazards; 4) outdoor work. Results: Green-collar workers were significantly more likely to report exposure to VGDF and outdoor work than nongreen-collar workers [adjusted odds ratio (AOR)=1.25; 95% CI=1.11 to 1.40; AOR=1.44 (1.26 to 1.63), respectively]. Green-collar workers were less likely to be exposed to chemicals (AOR=0.80; 0.69 to 0.92). Conclusions: Green-collar workers appear to be at a greater risk for select workplace exposures. As the green industry continues to grow, it is important to identify these occupational hazards in order to maximize worker health.

AB - Objective: "Green collar" workers serve in occupations that directly improve environmental quality and sustainability. This study estimates and compares the prevalence of select physical and chemical exposures among green versus non-green U.S. workers. Methods: Data from the U.S. 2010 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) Occupational Health Supplement were linked to the Occupational Information Network (O-NET) Database. We examined four main exposures: 1) vapors, gas, dust, fumes (VGDF); 2) secondhand tobacco smoke; 3) skin hazards; 4) outdoor work. Results: Green-collar workers were significantly more likely to report exposure to VGDF and outdoor work than nongreen-collar workers [adjusted odds ratio (AOR)=1.25; 95% CI=1.11 to 1.40; AOR=1.44 (1.26 to 1.63), respectively]. Green-collar workers were less likely to be exposed to chemicals (AOR=0.80; 0.69 to 0.92). Conclusions: Green-collar workers appear to be at a greater risk for select workplace exposures. As the green industry continues to grow, it is important to identify these occupational hazards in order to maximize worker health.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020289466&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85020289466&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001004

DO - 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001004

M3 - Article

C2 - 28490043

AN - SCOPUS:85020289466

VL - 59

SP - e91-e96

JO - Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

JF - Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

SN - 1076-2752

IS - 5

ER -