Characterizing implementation strategies using a systems engineering survey and interview tool: A comparison across 10 prevention programs for drug abuse and HIV sexual risk behavior

Sara J Czaja, Thomas W. Valente, Sankaran N. Nair, Juan A. Villamar, C. Hendricks Brown

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Although many behavioral interventions have proven to be efficacious, new methodologies are required beyond efficacy trials to understand how to adopt, implement with fidelity, and sustain behavioral interventions in community settings. In this paper, we present a new approach, based on systems engineering concepts and methods, for characterizing implementation strategies that are used to deliver evidence-based behavioral interventions in health and social service settings. We demonstrate the use of this approach with implementation strategies, used or being used for broader dissemination of 10 evidence-based prevention program projects focused on the prevention of drug or HIV sex risk behaviors. Results: The results indicate that there are wide variations in intervention approaches and that there are challenges in program implementation including maintaining program fidelity, serving community needs, and adequate resources. The results also indicate that implementation requires a committed partnership between the program developers, implementation researchers, and community partners. In addition, there is a need for adaptability within programs to meet community needs, resources, and priorities while maintaining program fidelity. Conclusions: Our methodological approach enabled us to highlight challenges associated with the community implementation of health risk prevention interventions. We also demonstrate how comprehensive descriptions of interventions facilitate understanding of the requirements of program implementation and decisions about the feasibility of implementing a program in community settings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number70
JournalImplementation Science
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - May 17 2016

Fingerprint

Risk-Taking
Sexual Behavior
Substance-Related Disorders
HIV
Interviews
Social Work
Health Services
Surveys and Questionnaires
Research Personnel
Health
Pharmaceutical Preparations

Keywords

  • Behavioral interventions
  • Implementation science
  • Systems engineering

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Medicine(all)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health Informatics

Cite this

Characterizing implementation strategies using a systems engineering survey and interview tool : A comparison across 10 prevention programs for drug abuse and HIV sexual risk behavior. / Czaja, Sara J; Valente, Thomas W.; Nair, Sankaran N.; Villamar, Juan A.; Brown, C. Hendricks.

In: Implementation Science, Vol. 11, No. 1, 70, 17.05.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bc5ea798c3ea410a8df6ec416f7af9bf,
title = "Characterizing implementation strategies using a systems engineering survey and interview tool: A comparison across 10 prevention programs for drug abuse and HIV sexual risk behavior",
abstract = "Background: Although many behavioral interventions have proven to be efficacious, new methodologies are required beyond efficacy trials to understand how to adopt, implement with fidelity, and sustain behavioral interventions in community settings. In this paper, we present a new approach, based on systems engineering concepts and methods, for characterizing implementation strategies that are used to deliver evidence-based behavioral interventions in health and social service settings. We demonstrate the use of this approach with implementation strategies, used or being used for broader dissemination of 10 evidence-based prevention program projects focused on the prevention of drug or HIV sex risk behaviors. Results: The results indicate that there are wide variations in intervention approaches and that there are challenges in program implementation including maintaining program fidelity, serving community needs, and adequate resources. The results also indicate that implementation requires a committed partnership between the program developers, implementation researchers, and community partners. In addition, there is a need for adaptability within programs to meet community needs, resources, and priorities while maintaining program fidelity. Conclusions: Our methodological approach enabled us to highlight challenges associated with the community implementation of health risk prevention interventions. We also demonstrate how comprehensive descriptions of interventions facilitate understanding of the requirements of program implementation and decisions about the feasibility of implementing a program in community settings.",
keywords = "Behavioral interventions, Implementation science, Systems engineering",
author = "Czaja, {Sara J} and Valente, {Thomas W.} and Nair, {Sankaran N.} and Villamar, {Juan A.} and Brown, {C. Hendricks}",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1186/s13012-016-0433-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
journal = "Implementation Science",
issn = "1748-5908",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Characterizing implementation strategies using a systems engineering survey and interview tool

T2 - A comparison across 10 prevention programs for drug abuse and HIV sexual risk behavior

AU - Czaja, Sara J

AU - Valente, Thomas W.

AU - Nair, Sankaran N.

AU - Villamar, Juan A.

AU - Brown, C. Hendricks

PY - 2016/5/17

Y1 - 2016/5/17

N2 - Background: Although many behavioral interventions have proven to be efficacious, new methodologies are required beyond efficacy trials to understand how to adopt, implement with fidelity, and sustain behavioral interventions in community settings. In this paper, we present a new approach, based on systems engineering concepts and methods, for characterizing implementation strategies that are used to deliver evidence-based behavioral interventions in health and social service settings. We demonstrate the use of this approach with implementation strategies, used or being used for broader dissemination of 10 evidence-based prevention program projects focused on the prevention of drug or HIV sex risk behaviors. Results: The results indicate that there are wide variations in intervention approaches and that there are challenges in program implementation including maintaining program fidelity, serving community needs, and adequate resources. The results also indicate that implementation requires a committed partnership between the program developers, implementation researchers, and community partners. In addition, there is a need for adaptability within programs to meet community needs, resources, and priorities while maintaining program fidelity. Conclusions: Our methodological approach enabled us to highlight challenges associated with the community implementation of health risk prevention interventions. We also demonstrate how comprehensive descriptions of interventions facilitate understanding of the requirements of program implementation and decisions about the feasibility of implementing a program in community settings.

AB - Background: Although many behavioral interventions have proven to be efficacious, new methodologies are required beyond efficacy trials to understand how to adopt, implement with fidelity, and sustain behavioral interventions in community settings. In this paper, we present a new approach, based on systems engineering concepts and methods, for characterizing implementation strategies that are used to deliver evidence-based behavioral interventions in health and social service settings. We demonstrate the use of this approach with implementation strategies, used or being used for broader dissemination of 10 evidence-based prevention program projects focused on the prevention of drug or HIV sex risk behaviors. Results: The results indicate that there are wide variations in intervention approaches and that there are challenges in program implementation including maintaining program fidelity, serving community needs, and adequate resources. The results also indicate that implementation requires a committed partnership between the program developers, implementation researchers, and community partners. In addition, there is a need for adaptability within programs to meet community needs, resources, and priorities while maintaining program fidelity. Conclusions: Our methodological approach enabled us to highlight challenges associated with the community implementation of health risk prevention interventions. We also demonstrate how comprehensive descriptions of interventions facilitate understanding of the requirements of program implementation and decisions about the feasibility of implementing a program in community settings.

KW - Behavioral interventions

KW - Implementation science

KW - Systems engineering

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84977539937&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84977539937&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s13012-016-0433-3

DO - 10.1186/s13012-016-0433-3

M3 - Article

C2 - 27184963

AN - SCOPUS:84977539937

VL - 11

JO - Implementation Science

JF - Implementation Science

SN - 1748-5908

IS - 1

M1 - 70

ER -