Changing referral pattern in off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a strategy for improving surgical results.

G. D'Ancona, H. L. Karamanoukian, P. Soltoski, Tomas Salerno, J. Bergsland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We have previously shown that a less invasive surgical approach (LISA) can reduce mortality and morbidity in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). This appears to have led to the referral of increasingly high risk patients for this procedure as compared to patients undergoing traditional CABG. The purpose of this paper is to compare preoperative risk factors and postoperative complications in both LISA and conventional CABG cases using the New York State database. METHODS: From January 1997 to September 1998, 1,993 patients underwent CABG in our institution: 1,384 with CPB (group A) and 609 without CPB (group B). In group B (LISA), a well defined strategy was followed in an effort to prevent hemodynamic instability during coronary exposure, avoid myocardial ischemia, verify graft patency, and use alternative surgical incisions in reoperations. RESULTS: Analysis of preoperative risk factors using the NYS database showed a significant increase in comorbidities in group B (p < 0.005), while at the same time postoperative complications and risk-adjusted mortality were lower (p = NS). CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrates that by using the LISA, high risk patients can undergo CABG with equal or lower mortality and morbidity than traditional CABG.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)246-249
Number of pages4
JournalThe heart surgery forum
Volume2
Issue number3
StatePublished - Dec 1 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass
Coronary Artery Bypass
Referral and Consultation
Mortality
Databases
Morbidity
Reoperation
Myocardial Ischemia
Comorbidity
Hemodynamics
Transplants

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Changing referral pattern in off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery : a strategy for improving surgical results. / D'Ancona, G.; Karamanoukian, H. L.; Soltoski, P.; Salerno, Tomas; Bergsland, J.

In: The heart surgery forum, Vol. 2, No. 3, 01.12.1999, p. 246-249.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

D'Ancona, G, Karamanoukian, HL, Soltoski, P, Salerno, T & Bergsland, J 1999, 'Changing referral pattern in off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a strategy for improving surgical results.', The heart surgery forum, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 246-249.
D'Ancona, G. ; Karamanoukian, H. L. ; Soltoski, P. ; Salerno, Tomas ; Bergsland, J. / Changing referral pattern in off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery : a strategy for improving surgical results. In: The heart surgery forum. 1999 ; Vol. 2, No. 3. pp. 246-249.
@article{c238e2db4bc24e358cdb2dbc307a1e96,
title = "Changing referral pattern in off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a strategy for improving surgical results.",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: We have previously shown that a less invasive surgical approach (LISA) can reduce mortality and morbidity in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). This appears to have led to the referral of increasingly high risk patients for this procedure as compared to patients undergoing traditional CABG. The purpose of this paper is to compare preoperative risk factors and postoperative complications in both LISA and conventional CABG cases using the New York State database. METHODS: From January 1997 to September 1998, 1,993 patients underwent CABG in our institution: 1,384 with CPB (group A) and 609 without CPB (group B). In group B (LISA), a well defined strategy was followed in an effort to prevent hemodynamic instability during coronary exposure, avoid myocardial ischemia, verify graft patency, and use alternative surgical incisions in reoperations. RESULTS: Analysis of preoperative risk factors using the NYS database showed a significant increase in comorbidities in group B (p < 0.005), while at the same time postoperative complications and risk-adjusted mortality were lower (p = NS). CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrates that by using the LISA, high risk patients can undergo CABG with equal or lower mortality and morbidity than traditional CABG.",
author = "G. D'Ancona and Karamanoukian, {H. L.} and P. Soltoski and Tomas Salerno and J. Bergsland",
year = "1999",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "246--249",
journal = "Heart Surgery Forum",
issn = "1098-3511",
publisher = "Carden Jennings Publishing Co. Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Changing referral pattern in off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery

T2 - a strategy for improving surgical results.

AU - D'Ancona, G.

AU - Karamanoukian, H. L.

AU - Soltoski, P.

AU - Salerno, Tomas

AU - Bergsland, J.

PY - 1999/12/1

Y1 - 1999/12/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: We have previously shown that a less invasive surgical approach (LISA) can reduce mortality and morbidity in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). This appears to have led to the referral of increasingly high risk patients for this procedure as compared to patients undergoing traditional CABG. The purpose of this paper is to compare preoperative risk factors and postoperative complications in both LISA and conventional CABG cases using the New York State database. METHODS: From January 1997 to September 1998, 1,993 patients underwent CABG in our institution: 1,384 with CPB (group A) and 609 without CPB (group B). In group B (LISA), a well defined strategy was followed in an effort to prevent hemodynamic instability during coronary exposure, avoid myocardial ischemia, verify graft patency, and use alternative surgical incisions in reoperations. RESULTS: Analysis of preoperative risk factors using the NYS database showed a significant increase in comorbidities in group B (p < 0.005), while at the same time postoperative complications and risk-adjusted mortality were lower (p = NS). CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrates that by using the LISA, high risk patients can undergo CABG with equal or lower mortality and morbidity than traditional CABG.

AB - BACKGROUND: We have previously shown that a less invasive surgical approach (LISA) can reduce mortality and morbidity in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). This appears to have led to the referral of increasingly high risk patients for this procedure as compared to patients undergoing traditional CABG. The purpose of this paper is to compare preoperative risk factors and postoperative complications in both LISA and conventional CABG cases using the New York State database. METHODS: From January 1997 to September 1998, 1,993 patients underwent CABG in our institution: 1,384 with CPB (group A) and 609 without CPB (group B). In group B (LISA), a well defined strategy was followed in an effort to prevent hemodynamic instability during coronary exposure, avoid myocardial ischemia, verify graft patency, and use alternative surgical incisions in reoperations. RESULTS: Analysis of preoperative risk factors using the NYS database showed a significant increase in comorbidities in group B (p < 0.005), while at the same time postoperative complications and risk-adjusted mortality were lower (p = NS). CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrates that by using the LISA, high risk patients can undergo CABG with equal or lower mortality and morbidity than traditional CABG.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033301415&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033301415&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 11276485

AN - SCOPUS:0033301415

VL - 2

SP - 246

EP - 249

JO - Heart Surgery Forum

JF - Heart Surgery Forum

SN - 1098-3511

IS - 3

ER -