Cervical range of motion and strength during resting and neutral head postures in healthy young adults

Ira Fiebert, Kathryn Roach, Sally S. Yang, Lisa D. Dierking, Frances E. Hart

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purposes of this investigation were: 1) to determine whether cervical range of motion and strength differ when measured in resting head posture (RHP) vs. neutral head posture (NHP), 2) to examine gender differences in cervical range of motion, strength, and neck girth, and 3) to examine the relationship between cervical range of motion and strength with: a) neck girth, b) height, and c) weight. Forty-six graduate students (10 males, 36 females) age 20-40 with no history of cervical or shoulder girdle pathology were recruited. Height, weight, and neck girth were measured for each subject. The Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) device was used to determine the amount of forward head posture and active range of motion for flexion (FLEX), extension (EXT), right and left lateral flexion (RLF and LLF), and right and left rotation (RROT and LROT) with subjects seated in a straight-back chair. Isometric cervical strength for FLEX, EXT, RLF, LLF, RROT, and LROT was then determined using the Microfet hand-held dynamometer with subjects seated in a chair which stabilized the trunk. Subjects performed the six active range of motion and the six isometric contractions in the RHP and NHP. Greater range of motion for EXT was achieved in the NHP, while greater RLF, RROT and LROT was achieved in the RHP. LROT in the RHP was the only contraction to demonstrate significantly greater strength. Females had greater cervical extension than males in both postures. Males were consistently stronger than females for all contractions in both postures and had larger neck girths. Strength correlated with neck girth, weight, and then height.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)165-178
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation
Volume12
Issue number3
StatePublished - Dec 1 1999

Fingerprint

Articular Range of Motion
Posture
Young Adult
Head
Neck
Weights and Measures
Isometric Contraction
Hand
Pathology
Students
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • Isometric strength
  • Postures
  • Range of motion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Rehabilitation
  • Health Professions(all)
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Cervical range of motion and strength during resting and neutral head postures in healthy young adults. / Fiebert, Ira; Roach, Kathryn; Yang, Sally S.; Dierking, Lisa D.; Hart, Frances E.

In: Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, Vol. 12, No. 3, 01.12.1999, p. 165-178.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{32de0f998dd049dc8c08825f7d33f8d5,
title = "Cervical range of motion and strength during resting and neutral head postures in healthy young adults",
abstract = "The purposes of this investigation were: 1) to determine whether cervical range of motion and strength differ when measured in resting head posture (RHP) vs. neutral head posture (NHP), 2) to examine gender differences in cervical range of motion, strength, and neck girth, and 3) to examine the relationship between cervical range of motion and strength with: a) neck girth, b) height, and c) weight. Forty-six graduate students (10 males, 36 females) age 20-40 with no history of cervical or shoulder girdle pathology were recruited. Height, weight, and neck girth were measured for each subject. The Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) device was used to determine the amount of forward head posture and active range of motion for flexion (FLEX), extension (EXT), right and left lateral flexion (RLF and LLF), and right and left rotation (RROT and LROT) with subjects seated in a straight-back chair. Isometric cervical strength for FLEX, EXT, RLF, LLF, RROT, and LROT was then determined using the Microfet hand-held dynamometer with subjects seated in a chair which stabilized the trunk. Subjects performed the six active range of motion and the six isometric contractions in the RHP and NHP. Greater range of motion for EXT was achieved in the NHP, while greater RLF, RROT and LROT was achieved in the RHP. LROT in the RHP was the only contraction to demonstrate significantly greater strength. Females had greater cervical extension than males in both postures. Males were consistently stronger than females for all contractions in both postures and had larger neck girths. Strength correlated with neck girth, weight, and then height.",
keywords = "Isometric strength, Postures, Range of motion",
author = "Ira Fiebert and Kathryn Roach and Yang, {Sally S.} and Dierking, {Lisa D.} and Hart, {Frances E.}",
year = "1999",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "165--178",
journal = "Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation",
issn = "1053-8127",
publisher = "IOS Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cervical range of motion and strength during resting and neutral head postures in healthy young adults

AU - Fiebert, Ira

AU - Roach, Kathryn

AU - Yang, Sally S.

AU - Dierking, Lisa D.

AU - Hart, Frances E.

PY - 1999/12/1

Y1 - 1999/12/1

N2 - The purposes of this investigation were: 1) to determine whether cervical range of motion and strength differ when measured in resting head posture (RHP) vs. neutral head posture (NHP), 2) to examine gender differences in cervical range of motion, strength, and neck girth, and 3) to examine the relationship between cervical range of motion and strength with: a) neck girth, b) height, and c) weight. Forty-six graduate students (10 males, 36 females) age 20-40 with no history of cervical or shoulder girdle pathology were recruited. Height, weight, and neck girth were measured for each subject. The Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) device was used to determine the amount of forward head posture and active range of motion for flexion (FLEX), extension (EXT), right and left lateral flexion (RLF and LLF), and right and left rotation (RROT and LROT) with subjects seated in a straight-back chair. Isometric cervical strength for FLEX, EXT, RLF, LLF, RROT, and LROT was then determined using the Microfet hand-held dynamometer with subjects seated in a chair which stabilized the trunk. Subjects performed the six active range of motion and the six isometric contractions in the RHP and NHP. Greater range of motion for EXT was achieved in the NHP, while greater RLF, RROT and LROT was achieved in the RHP. LROT in the RHP was the only contraction to demonstrate significantly greater strength. Females had greater cervical extension than males in both postures. Males were consistently stronger than females for all contractions in both postures and had larger neck girths. Strength correlated with neck girth, weight, and then height.

AB - The purposes of this investigation were: 1) to determine whether cervical range of motion and strength differ when measured in resting head posture (RHP) vs. neutral head posture (NHP), 2) to examine gender differences in cervical range of motion, strength, and neck girth, and 3) to examine the relationship between cervical range of motion and strength with: a) neck girth, b) height, and c) weight. Forty-six graduate students (10 males, 36 females) age 20-40 with no history of cervical or shoulder girdle pathology were recruited. Height, weight, and neck girth were measured for each subject. The Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) device was used to determine the amount of forward head posture and active range of motion for flexion (FLEX), extension (EXT), right and left lateral flexion (RLF and LLF), and right and left rotation (RROT and LROT) with subjects seated in a straight-back chair. Isometric cervical strength for FLEX, EXT, RLF, LLF, RROT, and LROT was then determined using the Microfet hand-held dynamometer with subjects seated in a chair which stabilized the trunk. Subjects performed the six active range of motion and the six isometric contractions in the RHP and NHP. Greater range of motion for EXT was achieved in the NHP, while greater RLF, RROT and LROT was achieved in the RHP. LROT in the RHP was the only contraction to demonstrate significantly greater strength. Females had greater cervical extension than males in both postures. Males were consistently stronger than females for all contractions in both postures and had larger neck girths. Strength correlated with neck girth, weight, and then height.

KW - Isometric strength

KW - Postures

KW - Range of motion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033398037&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033398037&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0033398037

VL - 12

SP - 165

EP - 178

JO - Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation

JF - Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation

SN - 1053-8127

IS - 3

ER -