Center-surround interactions in two types of on-center retinal ganglion cells in the cat

T. L. Hickey, Ray Winters, J. G. Pollack

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Center-surround interactions of Group I and Group II cells (Winters, Hickey and Pollack, 1973) were studied by simultaneously presenting a small spot in the center of a unit's receptive field and an annulus in the receptive field periphery. The responses to this target configuration were compared to those elicited by the center spot alone and those elicited by presenting an annulus alone. Group I cells gave a transient response to a maintained central spot while Group II cells gave a sustained response for the same stimulus. Both Group I cells and Group II cells gave on-off responses to a center spot plus peripheral annulus but the on portion of the response was much weaker in Group II cells than in Group I cells, indicating greater peripheral suppression in these units. Linear summation of central and peripheral responses could be demonstrated for Group II cells but not Group I cells.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1511-1526
Number of pages16
JournalVision Research
Volume13
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1973

Fingerprint

Retinal Ganglion Cells
Cats

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems

Cite this

Center-surround interactions in two types of on-center retinal ganglion cells in the cat. / Hickey, T. L.; Winters, Ray; Pollack, J. G.

In: Vision Research, Vol. 13, No. 8, 01.01.1973, p. 1511-1526.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{89666a7c7d0b4ff88c1bfc09d85e03ee,
title = "Center-surround interactions in two types of on-center retinal ganglion cells in the cat",
abstract = "Center-surround interactions of Group I and Group II cells (Winters, Hickey and Pollack, 1973) were studied by simultaneously presenting a small spot in the center of a unit's receptive field and an annulus in the receptive field periphery. The responses to this target configuration were compared to those elicited by the center spot alone and those elicited by presenting an annulus alone. Group I cells gave a transient response to a maintained central spot while Group II cells gave a sustained response for the same stimulus. Both Group I cells and Group II cells gave on-off responses to a center spot plus peripheral annulus but the on portion of the response was much weaker in Group II cells than in Group I cells, indicating greater peripheral suppression in these units. Linear summation of central and peripheral responses could be demonstrated for Group II cells but not Group I cells.",
author = "Hickey, {T. L.} and Ray Winters and Pollack, {J. G.}",
year = "1973",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/0042-6989(73)90010-2",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "1511--1526",
journal = "Vision Research",
issn = "0042-6989",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Center-surround interactions in two types of on-center retinal ganglion cells in the cat

AU - Hickey, T. L.

AU - Winters, Ray

AU - Pollack, J. G.

PY - 1973/1/1

Y1 - 1973/1/1

N2 - Center-surround interactions of Group I and Group II cells (Winters, Hickey and Pollack, 1973) were studied by simultaneously presenting a small spot in the center of a unit's receptive field and an annulus in the receptive field periphery. The responses to this target configuration were compared to those elicited by the center spot alone and those elicited by presenting an annulus alone. Group I cells gave a transient response to a maintained central spot while Group II cells gave a sustained response for the same stimulus. Both Group I cells and Group II cells gave on-off responses to a center spot plus peripheral annulus but the on portion of the response was much weaker in Group II cells than in Group I cells, indicating greater peripheral suppression in these units. Linear summation of central and peripheral responses could be demonstrated for Group II cells but not Group I cells.

AB - Center-surround interactions of Group I and Group II cells (Winters, Hickey and Pollack, 1973) were studied by simultaneously presenting a small spot in the center of a unit's receptive field and an annulus in the receptive field periphery. The responses to this target configuration were compared to those elicited by the center spot alone and those elicited by presenting an annulus alone. Group I cells gave a transient response to a maintained central spot while Group II cells gave a sustained response for the same stimulus. Both Group I cells and Group II cells gave on-off responses to a center spot plus peripheral annulus but the on portion of the response was much weaker in Group II cells than in Group I cells, indicating greater peripheral suppression in these units. Linear summation of central and peripheral responses could be demonstrated for Group II cells but not Group I cells.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0015878788&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0015878788&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0042-6989(73)90010-2

DO - 10.1016/0042-6989(73)90010-2

M3 - Article

C2 - 4719083

AN - SCOPUS:0015878788

VL - 13

SP - 1511

EP - 1526

JO - Vision Research

JF - Vision Research

SN - 0042-6989

IS - 8

ER -