Causes and correction of dissatisfaction after implantation of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses

Allister Gibbons, Tayyeba K. Ali, Daniel P. Waren, Kendall Donaldson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the causes and possible solutions for patient dissatisfaction after the implantation of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses (IOLs). Methods: This study was a retrospective review of clinical records. All patients who were seen between January 2009 and December 2013 whose primary reason for consultation was dissatisfaction with visual performance after presbyopia-correcting IOL implantation were included in the study. A single treating physician, who determined the most probable cause of dissatisfaction, decided which interventions to pursue following the initial consultation. Results: Data from 74 eyes of 49 patients were analyzed. The most common cause for complaint was blurry or foggy vision both for distance and near (68%). Complaints were most frequently attributed to residual refractive error (57%) and dry eye (35%). The most common interventions pursued were treatment of refractive error with glasses or contact lenses (46%) and treatment for dry eye (24%). Corneal laser vision correction was done in 8% of eyes; 7% required an IOL exchange. After the interventions, 45% of patients had completed resolution of symptoms, 23% of patients were partially satisfied with the results, and 32% remained completely dissatisfied with the final results. Conclusion: The most identifiable causes of dissatisfaction after presbyopia-correcting IOL implantation are residual refractive error and dry eye. Most patients can be managed with conservative treatment, though a significant number of patients remained unsatisfied despite multiple measures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1965-1970
Number of pages6
JournalClinical Ophthalmology
Volume10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 11 2016

Fingerprint

Presbyopia
Intraocular Lenses
Refractive Errors
Intraocular Lens Implantation
Referral and Consultation
Contact Lenses
Glass
Lasers
Physicians
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Cataract
  • Intraocular lens
  • Multifocal intraocular lens
  • Presbyopia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Causes and correction of dissatisfaction after implantation of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses. / Gibbons, Allister; Ali, Tayyeba K.; Waren, Daniel P.; Donaldson, Kendall.

In: Clinical Ophthalmology, Vol. 10, 11.10.2016, p. 1965-1970.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c43b600c56ba4bdeb47613dbe0e1ea92,
title = "Causes and correction of dissatisfaction after implantation of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the causes and possible solutions for patient dissatisfaction after the implantation of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses (IOLs). Methods: This study was a retrospective review of clinical records. All patients who were seen between January 2009 and December 2013 whose primary reason for consultation was dissatisfaction with visual performance after presbyopia-correcting IOL implantation were included in the study. A single treating physician, who determined the most probable cause of dissatisfaction, decided which interventions to pursue following the initial consultation. Results: Data from 74 eyes of 49 patients were analyzed. The most common cause for complaint was blurry or foggy vision both for distance and near (68{\%}). Complaints were most frequently attributed to residual refractive error (57{\%}) and dry eye (35{\%}). The most common interventions pursued were treatment of refractive error with glasses or contact lenses (46{\%}) and treatment for dry eye (24{\%}). Corneal laser vision correction was done in 8{\%} of eyes; 7{\%} required an IOL exchange. After the interventions, 45{\%} of patients had completed resolution of symptoms, 23{\%} of patients were partially satisfied with the results, and 32{\%} remained completely dissatisfied with the final results. Conclusion: The most identifiable causes of dissatisfaction after presbyopia-correcting IOL implantation are residual refractive error and dry eye. Most patients can be managed with conservative treatment, though a significant number of patients remained unsatisfied despite multiple measures.",
keywords = "Cataract, Intraocular lens, Multifocal intraocular lens, Presbyopia",
author = "Allister Gibbons and Ali, {Tayyeba K.} and Waren, {Daniel P.} and Kendall Donaldson",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "11",
doi = "10.2147/OPTH.S114890",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "1965--1970",
journal = "Clinical Ophthalmology",
issn = "1177-5467",
publisher = "Dove Medical Press Ltd.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Causes and correction of dissatisfaction after implantation of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses

AU - Gibbons, Allister

AU - Ali, Tayyeba K.

AU - Waren, Daniel P.

AU - Donaldson, Kendall

PY - 2016/10/11

Y1 - 2016/10/11

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the causes and possible solutions for patient dissatisfaction after the implantation of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses (IOLs). Methods: This study was a retrospective review of clinical records. All patients who were seen between January 2009 and December 2013 whose primary reason for consultation was dissatisfaction with visual performance after presbyopia-correcting IOL implantation were included in the study. A single treating physician, who determined the most probable cause of dissatisfaction, decided which interventions to pursue following the initial consultation. Results: Data from 74 eyes of 49 patients were analyzed. The most common cause for complaint was blurry or foggy vision both for distance and near (68%). Complaints were most frequently attributed to residual refractive error (57%) and dry eye (35%). The most common interventions pursued were treatment of refractive error with glasses or contact lenses (46%) and treatment for dry eye (24%). Corneal laser vision correction was done in 8% of eyes; 7% required an IOL exchange. After the interventions, 45% of patients had completed resolution of symptoms, 23% of patients were partially satisfied with the results, and 32% remained completely dissatisfied with the final results. Conclusion: The most identifiable causes of dissatisfaction after presbyopia-correcting IOL implantation are residual refractive error and dry eye. Most patients can be managed with conservative treatment, though a significant number of patients remained unsatisfied despite multiple measures.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the causes and possible solutions for patient dissatisfaction after the implantation of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses (IOLs). Methods: This study was a retrospective review of clinical records. All patients who were seen between January 2009 and December 2013 whose primary reason for consultation was dissatisfaction with visual performance after presbyopia-correcting IOL implantation were included in the study. A single treating physician, who determined the most probable cause of dissatisfaction, decided which interventions to pursue following the initial consultation. Results: Data from 74 eyes of 49 patients were analyzed. The most common cause for complaint was blurry or foggy vision both for distance and near (68%). Complaints were most frequently attributed to residual refractive error (57%) and dry eye (35%). The most common interventions pursued were treatment of refractive error with glasses or contact lenses (46%) and treatment for dry eye (24%). Corneal laser vision correction was done in 8% of eyes; 7% required an IOL exchange. After the interventions, 45% of patients had completed resolution of symptoms, 23% of patients were partially satisfied with the results, and 32% remained completely dissatisfied with the final results. Conclusion: The most identifiable causes of dissatisfaction after presbyopia-correcting IOL implantation are residual refractive error and dry eye. Most patients can be managed with conservative treatment, though a significant number of patients remained unsatisfied despite multiple measures.

KW - Cataract

KW - Intraocular lens

KW - Multifocal intraocular lens

KW - Presbyopia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992034541&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84992034541&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2147/OPTH.S114890

DO - 10.2147/OPTH.S114890

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84992034541

VL - 10

SP - 1965

EP - 1970

JO - Clinical Ophthalmology

JF - Clinical Ophthalmology

SN - 1177-5467

ER -