Care of maxillofacial injuries

Survey of plastic surgeons

Seth Thaller, H. K. Kawamoto

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this survey was to evaluate the current trends in the care of facial trauma. Data were obtained through the responses of a survey mailed to all those members and candidates listed in the 1989 American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons Directory. A total of 2777 questionnaires were sent, with 1113 (40 percent) returned by means of a self-addressed envelope. Demographic results show that over 70 percent of the treating plastic surgeons fall within the age range 30 to 50 years. Although significant advances have occurred, treatment goals have remained unchanged. These center around the principles of accurate reduction and precise stabilization of fracture segments. The results of this survey reveal that a number of acceptable techniques were employed in the surgical repair of mandibular and zygomatic complex fractures. In the care of Le Fort III fractures, 59 percent of the respondents preferred the use of miniplates and screws for stabilization. Only 26.8 percent believed that facial fracture repair should be performed within the initial 24 hours. With frontal sinus fractures, the vast majority of plastic surgeons (82.1 percent) obtained a neurosurgical consultation. When the posterior wall was involved, 45.6 percent favored removal of the sinus mucosa, 29.7 percent obliterated the frontal sinus with a variety of autogenous materials, while 20.5 percent preferred cranialization. In summary, this survey shows a wide variation in the practice of facial fracture management within the plastic surgical community.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)562-567
Number of pages6
JournalPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Volume90
Issue number4
StatePublished - Jan 1 1992
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Maxillofacial Injuries
Frontal Sinus
Zygomatic Fractures
Directories
Plastics
Surveys and Questionnaires
Surgeons
Mucous Membrane
Referral and Consultation
Demography
Wounds and Injuries

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Care of maxillofacial injuries : Survey of plastic surgeons. / Thaller, Seth; Kawamoto, H. K.

In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Vol. 90, No. 4, 01.01.1992, p. 562-567.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{03c092f3a0e745b1a62f8272953ff3a3,
title = "Care of maxillofacial injuries: Survey of plastic surgeons",
abstract = "The purpose of this survey was to evaluate the current trends in the care of facial trauma. Data were obtained through the responses of a survey mailed to all those members and candidates listed in the 1989 American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons Directory. A total of 2777 questionnaires were sent, with 1113 (40 percent) returned by means of a self-addressed envelope. Demographic results show that over 70 percent of the treating plastic surgeons fall within the age range 30 to 50 years. Although significant advances have occurred, treatment goals have remained unchanged. These center around the principles of accurate reduction and precise stabilization of fracture segments. The results of this survey reveal that a number of acceptable techniques were employed in the surgical repair of mandibular and zygomatic complex fractures. In the care of Le Fort III fractures, 59 percent of the respondents preferred the use of miniplates and screws for stabilization. Only 26.8 percent believed that facial fracture repair should be performed within the initial 24 hours. With frontal sinus fractures, the vast majority of plastic surgeons (82.1 percent) obtained a neurosurgical consultation. When the posterior wall was involved, 45.6 percent favored removal of the sinus mucosa, 29.7 percent obliterated the frontal sinus with a variety of autogenous materials, while 20.5 percent preferred cranialization. In summary, this survey shows a wide variation in the practice of facial fracture management within the plastic surgical community.",
author = "Seth Thaller and Kawamoto, {H. K.}",
year = "1992",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "90",
pages = "562--567",
journal = "Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery",
issn = "0032-1052",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Care of maxillofacial injuries

T2 - Survey of plastic surgeons

AU - Thaller, Seth

AU - Kawamoto, H. K.

PY - 1992/1/1

Y1 - 1992/1/1

N2 - The purpose of this survey was to evaluate the current trends in the care of facial trauma. Data were obtained through the responses of a survey mailed to all those members and candidates listed in the 1989 American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons Directory. A total of 2777 questionnaires were sent, with 1113 (40 percent) returned by means of a self-addressed envelope. Demographic results show that over 70 percent of the treating plastic surgeons fall within the age range 30 to 50 years. Although significant advances have occurred, treatment goals have remained unchanged. These center around the principles of accurate reduction and precise stabilization of fracture segments. The results of this survey reveal that a number of acceptable techniques were employed in the surgical repair of mandibular and zygomatic complex fractures. In the care of Le Fort III fractures, 59 percent of the respondents preferred the use of miniplates and screws for stabilization. Only 26.8 percent believed that facial fracture repair should be performed within the initial 24 hours. With frontal sinus fractures, the vast majority of plastic surgeons (82.1 percent) obtained a neurosurgical consultation. When the posterior wall was involved, 45.6 percent favored removal of the sinus mucosa, 29.7 percent obliterated the frontal sinus with a variety of autogenous materials, while 20.5 percent preferred cranialization. In summary, this survey shows a wide variation in the practice of facial fracture management within the plastic surgical community.

AB - The purpose of this survey was to evaluate the current trends in the care of facial trauma. Data were obtained through the responses of a survey mailed to all those members and candidates listed in the 1989 American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons Directory. A total of 2777 questionnaires were sent, with 1113 (40 percent) returned by means of a self-addressed envelope. Demographic results show that over 70 percent of the treating plastic surgeons fall within the age range 30 to 50 years. Although significant advances have occurred, treatment goals have remained unchanged. These center around the principles of accurate reduction and precise stabilization of fracture segments. The results of this survey reveal that a number of acceptable techniques were employed in the surgical repair of mandibular and zygomatic complex fractures. In the care of Le Fort III fractures, 59 percent of the respondents preferred the use of miniplates and screws for stabilization. Only 26.8 percent believed that facial fracture repair should be performed within the initial 24 hours. With frontal sinus fractures, the vast majority of plastic surgeons (82.1 percent) obtained a neurosurgical consultation. When the posterior wall was involved, 45.6 percent favored removal of the sinus mucosa, 29.7 percent obliterated the frontal sinus with a variety of autogenous materials, while 20.5 percent preferred cranialization. In summary, this survey shows a wide variation in the practice of facial fracture management within the plastic surgical community.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026732928&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026732928&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 90

SP - 562

EP - 567

JO - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

JF - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

SN - 0032-1052

IS - 4

ER -