Cardiovascular and perceptual effects of reporting pain during the foot and forehead cold pressor tests

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In research involving the cold pressor test, a tacit presumption is often made that reporting pain during stimulation is not in itself reactive. This study examined whether, for the foot and forehead cold pressor tests, activities involved in reporting pain may affect (a) the evoked pattern of cardiovascular response, and (b) the magnitude of self-perceived pain. In 40 normotensive college men, increases in systolic blood pressure were greater during test sessions that included verbal ratings of pain, as compared to sessions in which pain was not reported. In contrast to its effect on physiological activation, reporting pain did not significantly alter the participant's perception of the painfulness of the test, on recollection shortly after the test. We conclude, therefore, that reporting pain during the cold pressor test may impose significant additional demands on the cardiovascular system, but it does not interfere significantly with the processing of nociceptive information.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)106-117
Number of pages12
JournalInternational Journal of Behavioral Medicine
Volume5
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 7 1998

Fingerprint

Forehead
Foot
Pain
Blood Pressure
Cardiovascular System
Automatic Data Processing
Research

Keywords

  • Cold pressor test
  • Foot
  • Forehead
  • Impedance cardiography
  • Pain ratings

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

@article{1b59cb52df4d47b0b3354f064dececa2,
title = "Cardiovascular and perceptual effects of reporting pain during the foot and forehead cold pressor tests",
abstract = "In research involving the cold pressor test, a tacit presumption is often made that reporting pain during stimulation is not in itself reactive. This study examined whether, for the foot and forehead cold pressor tests, activities involved in reporting pain may affect (a) the evoked pattern of cardiovascular response, and (b) the magnitude of self-perceived pain. In 40 normotensive college men, increases in systolic blood pressure were greater during test sessions that included verbal ratings of pain, as compared to sessions in which pain was not reported. In contrast to its effect on physiological activation, reporting pain did not significantly alter the participant's perception of the painfulness of the test, on recollection shortly after the test. We conclude, therefore, that reporting pain during the cold pressor test may impose significant additional demands on the cardiovascular system, but it does not interfere significantly with the processing of nociceptive information.",
keywords = "Cold pressor test, Foot, Forehead, Impedance cardiography, Pain ratings",
author = "Arnold Peckerman and Patrice Saab and Maria Llabre and Barry Hurwitz and Philip McCabe and Neil Schneiderman",
year = "1998",
month = "10",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1207/s15327558ijbm0502_2",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "106--117",
journal = "International Journal of Behavioral Medicine",
issn = "1070-5503",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cardiovascular and perceptual effects of reporting pain during the foot and forehead cold pressor tests

AU - Peckerman, Arnold

AU - Saab, Patrice

AU - Llabre, Maria

AU - Hurwitz, Barry

AU - McCabe, Philip

AU - Schneiderman, Neil

PY - 1998/10/7

Y1 - 1998/10/7

N2 - In research involving the cold pressor test, a tacit presumption is often made that reporting pain during stimulation is not in itself reactive. This study examined whether, for the foot and forehead cold pressor tests, activities involved in reporting pain may affect (a) the evoked pattern of cardiovascular response, and (b) the magnitude of self-perceived pain. In 40 normotensive college men, increases in systolic blood pressure were greater during test sessions that included verbal ratings of pain, as compared to sessions in which pain was not reported. In contrast to its effect on physiological activation, reporting pain did not significantly alter the participant's perception of the painfulness of the test, on recollection shortly after the test. We conclude, therefore, that reporting pain during the cold pressor test may impose significant additional demands on the cardiovascular system, but it does not interfere significantly with the processing of nociceptive information.

AB - In research involving the cold pressor test, a tacit presumption is often made that reporting pain during stimulation is not in itself reactive. This study examined whether, for the foot and forehead cold pressor tests, activities involved in reporting pain may affect (a) the evoked pattern of cardiovascular response, and (b) the magnitude of self-perceived pain. In 40 normotensive college men, increases in systolic blood pressure were greater during test sessions that included verbal ratings of pain, as compared to sessions in which pain was not reported. In contrast to its effect on physiological activation, reporting pain did not significantly alter the participant's perception of the painfulness of the test, on recollection shortly after the test. We conclude, therefore, that reporting pain during the cold pressor test may impose significant additional demands on the cardiovascular system, but it does not interfere significantly with the processing of nociceptive information.

KW - Cold pressor test

KW - Foot

KW - Forehead

KW - Impedance cardiography

KW - Pain ratings

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031708178&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031708178&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1207/s15327558ijbm0502_2

DO - 10.1207/s15327558ijbm0502_2

M3 - Article

C2 - 16250707

AN - SCOPUS:0031708178

VL - 5

SP - 106

EP - 117

JO - International Journal of Behavioral Medicine

JF - International Journal of Behavioral Medicine

SN - 1070-5503

IS - 2

ER -