Carbon fiber couch effects on skin dose for volumetric modulated arcs

Ivaylo B Mihaylov, Karl Bzdusek, Michael Kaus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the dosimetric effect of carbon fiber couches (CFCs) on delivered skin dose as well as to explore potential venues for its minimization for volumetric modulated arc (VMAT) treatments. Methods: A carbon fiber couch (BrainLab) was incorporated in Pinnacle treatment planning system (TPS) by autocontouring. A retrospective investigation on five lung and five prostate patient plans was performed. Targets and organs at risk (OARs), together with a 0.3 cm thick skin contour interfacing the CFC, were outlined in each plan. For each patient, two VMAT plans were generated: a single arc with 6 MV photon energy and two or three arcs with 18 MV photon energy for the posterior arc(s) and 6 MV energy for the anterior arc (mixed energy plans). Both plans for each patient case were normalized such that 95 of the PTV was covered by the same prescription dose, ranging from 7600 to 7800 cGy. For each patient, the prescription doses were escalated to the maximum allowed by the OAR constraints. CFC bolus effects on skin doses were tallied by the highest dose to 1 of skin volume. Results: With the utilization of higher energy photons for the posterior arcs, the statistically significant differences in skin dose between the two plans were as high as 34 of the prescribed dose, where surface doses changed on average from 3800 to 2940 cGy for 6 MV and mixed energy plans, respectively. In addition, skin doses in excess of 68 and 80 of the prescription doses for mixed and 6 MV energy plans, respectively, were observed in individual cases. Conclusions: The presented findings indicate that mixed energy VMAT plans would result in a substantial skin sparing of more than ∼34 compared to VMAT plans with only 6 MV arc(s). Additionally, the high skin doses in some cases (81 of the prescription dose) suggest that in hypofractionated SRSSRT treatments, the carbon fiber couch effects on skin doses need to be evaluated when arc delivery is considered as a treatment option.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2419-2423
Number of pages5
JournalMedical Physics
Volume38
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Skin
Prescriptions
Photons
Organs at Risk
carbon fiber
Therapeutics
Prostate
Lung

Keywords

  • carbon fiber
  • couch
  • IMRT
  • skin dose
  • VMAT

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Carbon fiber couch effects on skin dose for volumetric modulated arcs. / Mihaylov, Ivaylo B; Bzdusek, Karl; Kaus, Michael.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 38, No. 5, 05.2011, p. 2419-2423.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mihaylov, Ivaylo B ; Bzdusek, Karl ; Kaus, Michael. / Carbon fiber couch effects on skin dose for volumetric modulated arcs. In: Medical Physics. 2011 ; Vol. 38, No. 5. pp. 2419-2423.
@article{5a12a92e6ef14ca3a221110a1b3641b6,
title = "Carbon fiber couch effects on skin dose for volumetric modulated arcs",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the dosimetric effect of carbon fiber couches (CFCs) on delivered skin dose as well as to explore potential venues for its minimization for volumetric modulated arc (VMAT) treatments. Methods: A carbon fiber couch (BrainLab) was incorporated in Pinnacle treatment planning system (TPS) by autocontouring. A retrospective investigation on five lung and five prostate patient plans was performed. Targets and organs at risk (OARs), together with a 0.3 cm thick skin contour interfacing the CFC, were outlined in each plan. For each patient, two VMAT plans were generated: a single arc with 6 MV photon energy and two or three arcs with 18 MV photon energy for the posterior arc(s) and 6 MV energy for the anterior arc (mixed energy plans). Both plans for each patient case were normalized such that 95 of the PTV was covered by the same prescription dose, ranging from 7600 to 7800 cGy. For each patient, the prescription doses were escalated to the maximum allowed by the OAR constraints. CFC bolus effects on skin doses were tallied by the highest dose to 1 of skin volume. Results: With the utilization of higher energy photons for the posterior arcs, the statistically significant differences in skin dose between the two plans were as high as 34 of the prescribed dose, where surface doses changed on average from 3800 to 2940 cGy for 6 MV and mixed energy plans, respectively. In addition, skin doses in excess of 68 and 80 of the prescription doses for mixed and 6 MV energy plans, respectively, were observed in individual cases. Conclusions: The presented findings indicate that mixed energy VMAT plans would result in a substantial skin sparing of more than ∼34 compared to VMAT plans with only 6 MV arc(s). Additionally, the high skin doses in some cases (81 of the prescription dose) suggest that in hypofractionated SRSSRT treatments, the carbon fiber couch effects on skin doses need to be evaluated when arc delivery is considered as a treatment option.",
keywords = "carbon fiber, couch, IMRT, skin dose, VMAT",
author = "Mihaylov, {Ivaylo B} and Karl Bzdusek and Michael Kaus",
year = "2011",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1118/1.3576106",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "2419--2423",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Carbon fiber couch effects on skin dose for volumetric modulated arcs

AU - Mihaylov, Ivaylo B

AU - Bzdusek, Karl

AU - Kaus, Michael

PY - 2011/5

Y1 - 2011/5

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the dosimetric effect of carbon fiber couches (CFCs) on delivered skin dose as well as to explore potential venues for its minimization for volumetric modulated arc (VMAT) treatments. Methods: A carbon fiber couch (BrainLab) was incorporated in Pinnacle treatment planning system (TPS) by autocontouring. A retrospective investigation on five lung and five prostate patient plans was performed. Targets and organs at risk (OARs), together with a 0.3 cm thick skin contour interfacing the CFC, were outlined in each plan. For each patient, two VMAT plans were generated: a single arc with 6 MV photon energy and two or three arcs with 18 MV photon energy for the posterior arc(s) and 6 MV energy for the anterior arc (mixed energy plans). Both plans for each patient case were normalized such that 95 of the PTV was covered by the same prescription dose, ranging from 7600 to 7800 cGy. For each patient, the prescription doses were escalated to the maximum allowed by the OAR constraints. CFC bolus effects on skin doses were tallied by the highest dose to 1 of skin volume. Results: With the utilization of higher energy photons for the posterior arcs, the statistically significant differences in skin dose between the two plans were as high as 34 of the prescribed dose, where surface doses changed on average from 3800 to 2940 cGy for 6 MV and mixed energy plans, respectively. In addition, skin doses in excess of 68 and 80 of the prescription doses for mixed and 6 MV energy plans, respectively, were observed in individual cases. Conclusions: The presented findings indicate that mixed energy VMAT plans would result in a substantial skin sparing of more than ∼34 compared to VMAT plans with only 6 MV arc(s). Additionally, the high skin doses in some cases (81 of the prescription dose) suggest that in hypofractionated SRSSRT treatments, the carbon fiber couch effects on skin doses need to be evaluated when arc delivery is considered as a treatment option.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the dosimetric effect of carbon fiber couches (CFCs) on delivered skin dose as well as to explore potential venues for its minimization for volumetric modulated arc (VMAT) treatments. Methods: A carbon fiber couch (BrainLab) was incorporated in Pinnacle treatment planning system (TPS) by autocontouring. A retrospective investigation on five lung and five prostate patient plans was performed. Targets and organs at risk (OARs), together with a 0.3 cm thick skin contour interfacing the CFC, were outlined in each plan. For each patient, two VMAT plans were generated: a single arc with 6 MV photon energy and two or three arcs with 18 MV photon energy for the posterior arc(s) and 6 MV energy for the anterior arc (mixed energy plans). Both plans for each patient case were normalized such that 95 of the PTV was covered by the same prescription dose, ranging from 7600 to 7800 cGy. For each patient, the prescription doses were escalated to the maximum allowed by the OAR constraints. CFC bolus effects on skin doses were tallied by the highest dose to 1 of skin volume. Results: With the utilization of higher energy photons for the posterior arcs, the statistically significant differences in skin dose between the two plans were as high as 34 of the prescribed dose, where surface doses changed on average from 3800 to 2940 cGy for 6 MV and mixed energy plans, respectively. In addition, skin doses in excess of 68 and 80 of the prescription doses for mixed and 6 MV energy plans, respectively, were observed in individual cases. Conclusions: The presented findings indicate that mixed energy VMAT plans would result in a substantial skin sparing of more than ∼34 compared to VMAT plans with only 6 MV arc(s). Additionally, the high skin doses in some cases (81 of the prescription dose) suggest that in hypofractionated SRSSRT treatments, the carbon fiber couch effects on skin doses need to be evaluated when arc delivery is considered as a treatment option.

KW - carbon fiber

KW - couch

KW - IMRT

KW - skin dose

KW - VMAT

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79959562477&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79959562477&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.3576106

DO - 10.1118/1.3576106

M3 - Article

C2 - 21776776

AN - SCOPUS:79959562477

VL - 38

SP - 2419

EP - 2423

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 5

ER -