‘Cannot predict now’: The role of repositories in the future of the journal

Sarah L. Shreeves

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Repositories, whether institutional or subject-based (disciplinary), typically provide open access to preprints and final manuscripts of accepted journal articles, among other material. While repositories generally do not perform all of the traditional activities of formal publication such as peer review, editing, and formatting and, except for a few exceptions, have struggled to attract researchers to deposit articles, it is fair to ask what impact such repositories have or might evolve to have on the academic journal. A handful of disciplinary repositories have become loci for scholarly dissemination and interaction. Academic libraries and other institutional-based hosts of repositories are slowly gaining experience in building and maintaining the infrastructure necessary for participation in the scholarly publishing sphere. While a few libraries have begun to use this experience to offer support for publishing, others have developed programs to raise awareness of ‘author rights’ and to encourage faculty advocacy within the scholarly publishing arena. This chapter provides an overview of the repository landscape and outlines some of the ways in which repositories may have an impact on the future of the academic journal. The title refers to one of the answers that Mattel’s Magic Eight Ball gives when asked to answer a yes or no question. With two rather momentous events in early 2008—the mandate that research funded through the National Institute of Health be deposited into PubMed Central and the unexpected mandate from Harvard’s Faculty of Arts and Sciences that published articles be deposited into the institutional repository—it is clear that this rapidly changing landscape is subject to upheavals, reversals, and sudden surges forward.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe future of the journal in the digital age
EditorsBill Cope, Angus Phillips
Place of PublicationOxford, UK
PublisherChandos Press
Pages197-211
StatePublished - 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

formatting
peer review
open access
experience
art
infrastructure
participation
event
interaction
science
health

Keywords

  • institutional repository
  • disciplinary repository
  • scholarly communication
  • academic journals

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Library and Information Sciences

Cite this

Shreeves, S. L. (2009). ‘Cannot predict now’: The role of repositories in the future of the journal. In B. Cope, & A. Phillips (Eds.), The future of the journal in the digital age (pp. 197-211). Oxford, UK: Chandos Press.

‘Cannot predict now’: The role of repositories in the future of the journal. / Shreeves, Sarah L.

The future of the journal in the digital age. ed. / Bill Cope; Angus Phillips. Oxford, UK : Chandos Press, 2009. p. 197-211.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Shreeves, SL 2009, ‘Cannot predict now’: The role of repositories in the future of the journal. in B Cope & A Phillips (eds), The future of the journal in the digital age. Chandos Press, Oxford, UK, pp. 197-211.
Shreeves SL. ‘Cannot predict now’: The role of repositories in the future of the journal. In Cope B, Phillips A, editors, The future of the journal in the digital age. Oxford, UK: Chandos Press. 2009. p. 197-211
Shreeves, Sarah L. / ‘Cannot predict now’: The role of repositories in the future of the journal. The future of the journal in the digital age. editor / Bill Cope ; Angus Phillips. Oxford, UK : Chandos Press, 2009. pp. 197-211
@inbook{ea33585f1b8e423fa4d255fba435728f,
title = "‘Cannot predict now’: The role of repositories in the future of the journal",
abstract = "Repositories, whether institutional or subject-based (disciplinary), typically provide open access to preprints and final manuscripts of accepted journal articles, among other material. While repositories generally do not perform all of the traditional activities of formal publication such as peer review, editing, and formatting and, except for a few exceptions, have struggled to attract researchers to deposit articles, it is fair to ask what impact such repositories have or might evolve to have on the academic journal. A handful of disciplinary repositories have become loci for scholarly dissemination and interaction. Academic libraries and other institutional-based hosts of repositories are slowly gaining experience in building and maintaining the infrastructure necessary for participation in the scholarly publishing sphere. While a few libraries have begun to use this experience to offer support for publishing, others have developed programs to raise awareness of ‘author rights’ and to encourage faculty advocacy within the scholarly publishing arena. This chapter provides an overview of the repository landscape and outlines some of the ways in which repositories may have an impact on the future of the academic journal. The title refers to one of the answers that Mattel’s Magic Eight Ball gives when asked to answer a yes or no question. With two rather momentous events in early 2008—the mandate that research funded through the National Institute of Health be deposited into PubMed Central and the unexpected mandate from Harvard’s Faculty of Arts and Sciences that published articles be deposited into the institutional repository—it is clear that this rapidly changing landscape is subject to upheavals, reversals, and sudden surges forward.",
keywords = "institutional repository, disciplinary repository, scholarly communication, academic journals",
author = "Shreeves, {Sarah L.}",
year = "2009",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "197--211",
editor = "Bill Cope and Angus Phillips",
booktitle = "The future of the journal in the digital age",
publisher = "Chandos Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - ‘Cannot predict now’: The role of repositories in the future of the journal

AU - Shreeves, Sarah L.

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Repositories, whether institutional or subject-based (disciplinary), typically provide open access to preprints and final manuscripts of accepted journal articles, among other material. While repositories generally do not perform all of the traditional activities of formal publication such as peer review, editing, and formatting and, except for a few exceptions, have struggled to attract researchers to deposit articles, it is fair to ask what impact such repositories have or might evolve to have on the academic journal. A handful of disciplinary repositories have become loci for scholarly dissemination and interaction. Academic libraries and other institutional-based hosts of repositories are slowly gaining experience in building and maintaining the infrastructure necessary for participation in the scholarly publishing sphere. While a few libraries have begun to use this experience to offer support for publishing, others have developed programs to raise awareness of ‘author rights’ and to encourage faculty advocacy within the scholarly publishing arena. This chapter provides an overview of the repository landscape and outlines some of the ways in which repositories may have an impact on the future of the academic journal. The title refers to one of the answers that Mattel’s Magic Eight Ball gives when asked to answer a yes or no question. With two rather momentous events in early 2008—the mandate that research funded through the National Institute of Health be deposited into PubMed Central and the unexpected mandate from Harvard’s Faculty of Arts and Sciences that published articles be deposited into the institutional repository—it is clear that this rapidly changing landscape is subject to upheavals, reversals, and sudden surges forward.

AB - Repositories, whether institutional or subject-based (disciplinary), typically provide open access to preprints and final manuscripts of accepted journal articles, among other material. While repositories generally do not perform all of the traditional activities of formal publication such as peer review, editing, and formatting and, except for a few exceptions, have struggled to attract researchers to deposit articles, it is fair to ask what impact such repositories have or might evolve to have on the academic journal. A handful of disciplinary repositories have become loci for scholarly dissemination and interaction. Academic libraries and other institutional-based hosts of repositories are slowly gaining experience in building and maintaining the infrastructure necessary for participation in the scholarly publishing sphere. While a few libraries have begun to use this experience to offer support for publishing, others have developed programs to raise awareness of ‘author rights’ and to encourage faculty advocacy within the scholarly publishing arena. This chapter provides an overview of the repository landscape and outlines some of the ways in which repositories may have an impact on the future of the academic journal. The title refers to one of the answers that Mattel’s Magic Eight Ball gives when asked to answer a yes or no question. With two rather momentous events in early 2008—the mandate that research funded through the National Institute of Health be deposited into PubMed Central and the unexpected mandate from Harvard’s Faculty of Arts and Sciences that published articles be deposited into the institutional repository—it is clear that this rapidly changing landscape is subject to upheavals, reversals, and sudden surges forward.

KW - institutional repository

KW - disciplinary repository

KW - scholarly communication

KW - academic journals

M3 - Chapter

SP - 197

EP - 211

BT - The future of the journal in the digital age

A2 - Cope, Bill

A2 - Phillips, Angus

PB - Chandos Press

CY - Oxford, UK

ER -