Can ultrasound replace diagnostic peritoneal lavage in the assessment of blunt trauma?

M. McKenney, K. Lentz, D. Nunez, J. L. Sosa, Danny Sleeman, A. Axelrad, L. Martin, O. Kirton, C. Oldham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

158 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) and computed tomography (CT) are the primary diagnostic modalities in the evaluation of patients with suspected blunt abdominal trauma (BAT). Diagnostic peritoneal lavage is fast and accurate but associated with complications. Computed tomography is also accurate, yet requires that patients be stable and transportable. A prospective study was designed to determine the utility of emergency ultrasound (US) studies in the initial assessment of BAT. Two hundred acutely injured patients with suspected BAT were evaluated with US. Patients were eligible for the study if they met trauma criteria and had suspected BAT. Subsequently, without knowledge of the US results, DPL or CT was performed. Ultrasound showed a sensitivity of 83%, a specificity of 100%, and an accuracy of 97% in detecting intra-abdominal injuries. Six injuries were missed but only one was felt to be significant. If US had been used in all 200 patients, 199 would have had appropriate care. We conclude US is reliable in the detection of free intraperitoneal fluid and may be used in place of DPL or CT.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)439-441
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Trauma
Volume37
Issue number3
StatePublished - Jan 1 1994

Fingerprint

Peritoneal Lavage
Ultrasonography
Wounds and Injuries
Tomography
Abdominal Injuries
Emergencies
Prospective Studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

McKenney, M., Lentz, K., Nunez, D., Sosa, J. L., Sleeman, D., Axelrad, A., ... Oldham, C. (1994). Can ultrasound replace diagnostic peritoneal lavage in the assessment of blunt trauma? Journal of Trauma, 37(3), 439-441.

Can ultrasound replace diagnostic peritoneal lavage in the assessment of blunt trauma? / McKenney, M.; Lentz, K.; Nunez, D.; Sosa, J. L.; Sleeman, Danny; Axelrad, A.; Martin, L.; Kirton, O.; Oldham, C.

In: Journal of Trauma, Vol. 37, No. 3, 01.01.1994, p. 439-441.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McKenney, M, Lentz, K, Nunez, D, Sosa, JL, Sleeman, D, Axelrad, A, Martin, L, Kirton, O & Oldham, C 1994, 'Can ultrasound replace diagnostic peritoneal lavage in the assessment of blunt trauma?', Journal of Trauma, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 439-441.
McKenney M, Lentz K, Nunez D, Sosa JL, Sleeman D, Axelrad A et al. Can ultrasound replace diagnostic peritoneal lavage in the assessment of blunt trauma? Journal of Trauma. 1994 Jan 1;37(3):439-441.
McKenney, M. ; Lentz, K. ; Nunez, D. ; Sosa, J. L. ; Sleeman, Danny ; Axelrad, A. ; Martin, L. ; Kirton, O. ; Oldham, C. / Can ultrasound replace diagnostic peritoneal lavage in the assessment of blunt trauma?. In: Journal of Trauma. 1994 ; Vol. 37, No. 3. pp. 439-441.
@article{34c43b9c04074d5692da91e328c9e24e,
title = "Can ultrasound replace diagnostic peritoneal lavage in the assessment of blunt trauma?",
abstract = "Diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) and computed tomography (CT) are the primary diagnostic modalities in the evaluation of patients with suspected blunt abdominal trauma (BAT). Diagnostic peritoneal lavage is fast and accurate but associated with complications. Computed tomography is also accurate, yet requires that patients be stable and transportable. A prospective study was designed to determine the utility of emergency ultrasound (US) studies in the initial assessment of BAT. Two hundred acutely injured patients with suspected BAT were evaluated with US. Patients were eligible for the study if they met trauma criteria and had suspected BAT. Subsequently, without knowledge of the US results, DPL or CT was performed. Ultrasound showed a sensitivity of 83{\%}, a specificity of 100{\%}, and an accuracy of 97{\%} in detecting intra-abdominal injuries. Six injuries were missed but only one was felt to be significant. If US had been used in all 200 patients, 199 would have had appropriate care. We conclude US is reliable in the detection of free intraperitoneal fluid and may be used in place of DPL or CT.",
author = "M. McKenney and K. Lentz and D. Nunez and Sosa, {J. L.} and Danny Sleeman and A. Axelrad and L. Martin and O. Kirton and C. Oldham",
year = "1994",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "439--441",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can ultrasound replace diagnostic peritoneal lavage in the assessment of blunt trauma?

AU - McKenney, M.

AU - Lentz, K.

AU - Nunez, D.

AU - Sosa, J. L.

AU - Sleeman, Danny

AU - Axelrad, A.

AU - Martin, L.

AU - Kirton, O.

AU - Oldham, C.

PY - 1994/1/1

Y1 - 1994/1/1

N2 - Diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) and computed tomography (CT) are the primary diagnostic modalities in the evaluation of patients with suspected blunt abdominal trauma (BAT). Diagnostic peritoneal lavage is fast and accurate but associated with complications. Computed tomography is also accurate, yet requires that patients be stable and transportable. A prospective study was designed to determine the utility of emergency ultrasound (US) studies in the initial assessment of BAT. Two hundred acutely injured patients with suspected BAT were evaluated with US. Patients were eligible for the study if they met trauma criteria and had suspected BAT. Subsequently, without knowledge of the US results, DPL or CT was performed. Ultrasound showed a sensitivity of 83%, a specificity of 100%, and an accuracy of 97% in detecting intra-abdominal injuries. Six injuries were missed but only one was felt to be significant. If US had been used in all 200 patients, 199 would have had appropriate care. We conclude US is reliable in the detection of free intraperitoneal fluid and may be used in place of DPL or CT.

AB - Diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) and computed tomography (CT) are the primary diagnostic modalities in the evaluation of patients with suspected blunt abdominal trauma (BAT). Diagnostic peritoneal lavage is fast and accurate but associated with complications. Computed tomography is also accurate, yet requires that patients be stable and transportable. A prospective study was designed to determine the utility of emergency ultrasound (US) studies in the initial assessment of BAT. Two hundred acutely injured patients with suspected BAT were evaluated with US. Patients were eligible for the study if they met trauma criteria and had suspected BAT. Subsequently, without knowledge of the US results, DPL or CT was performed. Ultrasound showed a sensitivity of 83%, a specificity of 100%, and an accuracy of 97% in detecting intra-abdominal injuries. Six injuries were missed but only one was felt to be significant. If US had been used in all 200 patients, 199 would have had appropriate care. We conclude US is reliable in the detection of free intraperitoneal fluid and may be used in place of DPL or CT.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028041320&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028041320&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8083906

AN - SCOPUS:0028041320

VL - 37

SP - 439

EP - 441

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 3

ER -