Can circle hook use benefit billfishes?

Joseph E. Serafy, David W. Kerstetter, Patrick H. Rice

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We performed a quantitative review to evaluate circle hook use in recreational and commercial hook-and-line fisheries that interact with billfishes (Family: Istiophoridae). Specifically, we scrutinized the findings of 11 recent empirical studies that reported, on a species-specific basis, side-by-side measures of circle vs. J-hook fishing performance: catch, mortality, deep-hooking and bleeding rates. Of the 30 total comparisons extracted from the literature that satisfied our inclusion criteria, 13 indicated significant differences between hook types for the specific metric compared. No study reported significant billfish catch rate differences between hook types. However, when significant differences between hook types were found, higher mortality rates and higher rates of deep-hooking and bleeding were associated with J-hooks relative to circle hooks. We conclude that empirical evidence is sufficient to promote circle hook use in almost all hook-and-line fishery sectors that typically interact with istiophorids. However, billfish conservation benefits will only be realized if fishers use unmodified circle hooks, commit to releasing live fish and take other appropriate measures which maximize post-release survival. While there may be fishing modes where circle hook effects are negative, for billfish conservation, we recommend managers grant exceptions to circle hook use only when experimental results support such a practice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)132-142
Number of pages11
JournalFish and Fisheries
Volume10
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Istiophoridae
fishing
fishery
mortality
hemorrhage
fish hooks
fisheries
fish
managers
rate

Keywords

  • Billfish
  • Circle hooks
  • Hook performance
  • Marlin
  • Review
  • Sailfish

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Aquatic Science
  • Oceanography
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Serafy, J. E., Kerstetter, D. W., & Rice, P. H. (2009). Can circle hook use benefit billfishes? Fish and Fisheries, 10(2), 132-142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2979.2008.00298.x

Can circle hook use benefit billfishes? / Serafy, Joseph E.; Kerstetter, David W.; Rice, Patrick H.

In: Fish and Fisheries, Vol. 10, No. 2, 01.06.2009, p. 132-142.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Serafy, JE, Kerstetter, DW & Rice, PH 2009, 'Can circle hook use benefit billfishes?', Fish and Fisheries, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 132-142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2979.2008.00298.x
Serafy, Joseph E. ; Kerstetter, David W. ; Rice, Patrick H. / Can circle hook use benefit billfishes?. In: Fish and Fisheries. 2009 ; Vol. 10, No. 2. pp. 132-142.
@article{cc5814fc096a41649fce09f3a4c08b7a,
title = "Can circle hook use benefit billfishes?",
abstract = "We performed a quantitative review to evaluate circle hook use in recreational and commercial hook-and-line fisheries that interact with billfishes (Family: Istiophoridae). Specifically, we scrutinized the findings of 11 recent empirical studies that reported, on a species-specific basis, side-by-side measures of circle vs. J-hook fishing performance: catch, mortality, deep-hooking and bleeding rates. Of the 30 total comparisons extracted from the literature that satisfied our inclusion criteria, 13 indicated significant differences between hook types for the specific metric compared. No study reported significant billfish catch rate differences between hook types. However, when significant differences between hook types were found, higher mortality rates and higher rates of deep-hooking and bleeding were associated with J-hooks relative to circle hooks. We conclude that empirical evidence is sufficient to promote circle hook use in almost all hook-and-line fishery sectors that typically interact with istiophorids. However, billfish conservation benefits will only be realized if fishers use unmodified circle hooks, commit to releasing live fish and take other appropriate measures which maximize post-release survival. While there may be fishing modes where circle hook effects are negative, for billfish conservation, we recommend managers grant exceptions to circle hook use only when experimental results support such a practice.",
keywords = "Billfish, Circle hooks, Hook performance, Marlin, Review, Sailfish",
author = "Serafy, {Joseph E.} and Kerstetter, {David W.} and Rice, {Patrick H.}",
year = "2009",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-2979.2008.00298.x",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "132--142",
journal = "Fish and Fisheries",
issn = "1467-2960",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can circle hook use benefit billfishes?

AU - Serafy, Joseph E.

AU - Kerstetter, David W.

AU - Rice, Patrick H.

PY - 2009/6/1

Y1 - 2009/6/1

N2 - We performed a quantitative review to evaluate circle hook use in recreational and commercial hook-and-line fisheries that interact with billfishes (Family: Istiophoridae). Specifically, we scrutinized the findings of 11 recent empirical studies that reported, on a species-specific basis, side-by-side measures of circle vs. J-hook fishing performance: catch, mortality, deep-hooking and bleeding rates. Of the 30 total comparisons extracted from the literature that satisfied our inclusion criteria, 13 indicated significant differences between hook types for the specific metric compared. No study reported significant billfish catch rate differences between hook types. However, when significant differences between hook types were found, higher mortality rates and higher rates of deep-hooking and bleeding were associated with J-hooks relative to circle hooks. We conclude that empirical evidence is sufficient to promote circle hook use in almost all hook-and-line fishery sectors that typically interact with istiophorids. However, billfish conservation benefits will only be realized if fishers use unmodified circle hooks, commit to releasing live fish and take other appropriate measures which maximize post-release survival. While there may be fishing modes where circle hook effects are negative, for billfish conservation, we recommend managers grant exceptions to circle hook use only when experimental results support such a practice.

AB - We performed a quantitative review to evaluate circle hook use in recreational and commercial hook-and-line fisheries that interact with billfishes (Family: Istiophoridae). Specifically, we scrutinized the findings of 11 recent empirical studies that reported, on a species-specific basis, side-by-side measures of circle vs. J-hook fishing performance: catch, mortality, deep-hooking and bleeding rates. Of the 30 total comparisons extracted from the literature that satisfied our inclusion criteria, 13 indicated significant differences between hook types for the specific metric compared. No study reported significant billfish catch rate differences between hook types. However, when significant differences between hook types were found, higher mortality rates and higher rates of deep-hooking and bleeding were associated with J-hooks relative to circle hooks. We conclude that empirical evidence is sufficient to promote circle hook use in almost all hook-and-line fishery sectors that typically interact with istiophorids. However, billfish conservation benefits will only be realized if fishers use unmodified circle hooks, commit to releasing live fish and take other appropriate measures which maximize post-release survival. While there may be fishing modes where circle hook effects are negative, for billfish conservation, we recommend managers grant exceptions to circle hook use only when experimental results support such a practice.

KW - Billfish

KW - Circle hooks

KW - Hook performance

KW - Marlin

KW - Review

KW - Sailfish

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=66149160643&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=66149160643&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-2979.2008.00298.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-2979.2008.00298.x

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 132

EP - 142

JO - Fish and Fisheries

JF - Fish and Fisheries

SN - 1467-2960

IS - 2

ER -