Callosal neglect

Kenneth M. Heilman, David J. Adams

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: According to the interhemispheric inhibition model of neglect, the uninjured hemisphere inhibits (via the corpus callosum) the injured hemisphere but the injured hemisphere can no longer inhibit the opposite hemisphere, which becomes hyperactive and produces an ipsilesional attentional bias. Alternatively, according to the compensation hypothesis, the uninjured hemisphere helps compensate for the damaged hemisphere, which is impaired in directing attention to contralateral stimuli. If the inhibition model of neglect is correct, callosal disconnection should reduce neglect. If the compensation model is correct, however, it may increase or induce neglect. Patient: A 32-year-old woman, at age 14 years, developed a right frontal astrocytoma and was treated with surgery and radiation but had a cardiopulmonary arrest secondary to aspiration. Subsequent imaging studies revealed damage to the frontal, parietal, and occipital regions of the right hemisphere and damage to the temporal region of the left hemisphere. After discharge, she was able to return to school and drive a car, without any evidence of neglect. About 10 years later, she developed complex partial and atonic seizures that were multifocal and medically intractable. She underwent a complete section of her corpus callosum at age 31 years. Results: One year after the callosal section, she demonstrated (1) diminished spontaneous saccades to the left, hypometric leftward saccades, and left gaze impersistence; (2) left arm hemispatial limb akinesia; (3) unilateral spatial neglect; and (4) motor and cognitive impersistence. Conclusion: In patients with right hemisphere injury, callosal section may induce or enhance motor-intentional deficits and hemispatial neglect.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)276-279
Number of pages4
JournalArchives of Neurology
Volume60
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Corpus Callosum
Saccades
Perceptual Disorders
Occipital Lobe
Parietal Lobe
Astrocytoma
Patient Rights
Temporal Lobe
Heart Arrest
Seizures
Arm
Extremities
Neglect
Radiation
Hemisphere
Wounds and Injuries
Inhibition (Psychology)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Heilman, K. M., & Adams, D. J. (2003). Callosal neglect. Archives of Neurology, 60(2), 276-279. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.60.2.276

Callosal neglect. / Heilman, Kenneth M.; Adams, David J.

In: Archives of Neurology, Vol. 60, No. 2, 01.02.2003, p. 276-279.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Heilman, KM & Adams, DJ 2003, 'Callosal neglect', Archives of Neurology, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 276-279. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.60.2.276
Heilman KM, Adams DJ. Callosal neglect. Archives of Neurology. 2003 Feb 1;60(2):276-279. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.60.2.276
Heilman, Kenneth M. ; Adams, David J. / Callosal neglect. In: Archives of Neurology. 2003 ; Vol. 60, No. 2. pp. 276-279.
@article{36b1100976a44ef792bcf490f8790fb5,
title = "Callosal neglect",
abstract = "Background: According to the interhemispheric inhibition model of neglect, the uninjured hemisphere inhibits (via the corpus callosum) the injured hemisphere but the injured hemisphere can no longer inhibit the opposite hemisphere, which becomes hyperactive and produces an ipsilesional attentional bias. Alternatively, according to the compensation hypothesis, the uninjured hemisphere helps compensate for the damaged hemisphere, which is impaired in directing attention to contralateral stimuli. If the inhibition model of neglect is correct, callosal disconnection should reduce neglect. If the compensation model is correct, however, it may increase or induce neglect. Patient: A 32-year-old woman, at age 14 years, developed a right frontal astrocytoma and was treated with surgery and radiation but had a cardiopulmonary arrest secondary to aspiration. Subsequent imaging studies revealed damage to the frontal, parietal, and occipital regions of the right hemisphere and damage to the temporal region of the left hemisphere. After discharge, she was able to return to school and drive a car, without any evidence of neglect. About 10 years later, she developed complex partial and atonic seizures that were multifocal and medically intractable. She underwent a complete section of her corpus callosum at age 31 years. Results: One year after the callosal section, she demonstrated (1) diminished spontaneous saccades to the left, hypometric leftward saccades, and left gaze impersistence; (2) left arm hemispatial limb akinesia; (3) unilateral spatial neglect; and (4) motor and cognitive impersistence. Conclusion: In patients with right hemisphere injury, callosal section may induce or enhance motor-intentional deficits and hemispatial neglect.",
author = "Heilman, {Kenneth M.} and Adams, {David J.}",
year = "2003",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1001/archneur.60.2.276",
language = "English",
volume = "60",
pages = "276--279",
journal = "Archives of Neurology",
issn = "0003-9942",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Callosal neglect

AU - Heilman, Kenneth M.

AU - Adams, David J.

PY - 2003/2/1

Y1 - 2003/2/1

N2 - Background: According to the interhemispheric inhibition model of neglect, the uninjured hemisphere inhibits (via the corpus callosum) the injured hemisphere but the injured hemisphere can no longer inhibit the opposite hemisphere, which becomes hyperactive and produces an ipsilesional attentional bias. Alternatively, according to the compensation hypothesis, the uninjured hemisphere helps compensate for the damaged hemisphere, which is impaired in directing attention to contralateral stimuli. If the inhibition model of neglect is correct, callosal disconnection should reduce neglect. If the compensation model is correct, however, it may increase or induce neglect. Patient: A 32-year-old woman, at age 14 years, developed a right frontal astrocytoma and was treated with surgery and radiation but had a cardiopulmonary arrest secondary to aspiration. Subsequent imaging studies revealed damage to the frontal, parietal, and occipital regions of the right hemisphere and damage to the temporal region of the left hemisphere. After discharge, she was able to return to school and drive a car, without any evidence of neglect. About 10 years later, she developed complex partial and atonic seizures that were multifocal and medically intractable. She underwent a complete section of her corpus callosum at age 31 years. Results: One year after the callosal section, she demonstrated (1) diminished spontaneous saccades to the left, hypometric leftward saccades, and left gaze impersistence; (2) left arm hemispatial limb akinesia; (3) unilateral spatial neglect; and (4) motor and cognitive impersistence. Conclusion: In patients with right hemisphere injury, callosal section may induce or enhance motor-intentional deficits and hemispatial neglect.

AB - Background: According to the interhemispheric inhibition model of neglect, the uninjured hemisphere inhibits (via the corpus callosum) the injured hemisphere but the injured hemisphere can no longer inhibit the opposite hemisphere, which becomes hyperactive and produces an ipsilesional attentional bias. Alternatively, according to the compensation hypothesis, the uninjured hemisphere helps compensate for the damaged hemisphere, which is impaired in directing attention to contralateral stimuli. If the inhibition model of neglect is correct, callosal disconnection should reduce neglect. If the compensation model is correct, however, it may increase or induce neglect. Patient: A 32-year-old woman, at age 14 years, developed a right frontal astrocytoma and was treated with surgery and radiation but had a cardiopulmonary arrest secondary to aspiration. Subsequent imaging studies revealed damage to the frontal, parietal, and occipital regions of the right hemisphere and damage to the temporal region of the left hemisphere. After discharge, she was able to return to school and drive a car, without any evidence of neglect. About 10 years later, she developed complex partial and atonic seizures that were multifocal and medically intractable. She underwent a complete section of her corpus callosum at age 31 years. Results: One year after the callosal section, she demonstrated (1) diminished spontaneous saccades to the left, hypometric leftward saccades, and left gaze impersistence; (2) left arm hemispatial limb akinesia; (3) unilateral spatial neglect; and (4) motor and cognitive impersistence. Conclusion: In patients with right hemisphere injury, callosal section may induce or enhance motor-intentional deficits and hemispatial neglect.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037318502&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037318502&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/archneur.60.2.276

DO - 10.1001/archneur.60.2.276

M3 - Article

VL - 60

SP - 276

EP - 279

JO - Archives of Neurology

JF - Archives of Neurology

SN - 0003-9942

IS - 2

ER -