Bridging the divide between fisheries and marine conservation science

Anne K. Salomon, Sarah K. Gaichas, Olaf P. Jensen, Vera N. Agostini, N. A. Sloan, Jake Rice, Tim R. McClanahan, Mary H. Ruckelshaus, Phil S. Levin, Nicholas K. Dulvy, Elizabeth A Babcock

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

58 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Researchers from traditionally disparate disciplines and practitioners with typically incongruent mandates have begun working together to better understand and solve marine conservation and sustainable yield problems. Conservation practitioners are recognizing the need to achieve conservation goals in seascapes that are a source of livelihood and food security, while fisheries management is realizing that achieving economically and ecologically sustainable fisheries requires an understanding of the role of biodiversity and ecosystem dynamics in fishery production. Yet, tensions still exist due to the unique histories, epistemologies, cultures, values, and quantitative techniques of fisheries and marine conservation science, and the often-divergent objectives of the institutions and organizations these academic disciplines inform. While there is general agreement on what needs to be achieved (less overfishing, recovery of depleted fish stocks, reduction in bycatch and habitat impacts, jobs, food production), specific objectives and how best to achieve them remain contentious and unresolved. By analyzing three contemporary yet controversial marine policies (ecosystem-based fishery management, marine protected areas, and catch shares) and specific case studies, we demonstrate how both fisheries and marine conservation science can be used to provide clear scientific advice to practitioners and provide empirical evidence of the benefits of bridging the disciplinary divide. Finally, we discuss future prospects for collaboration in an emerging issue at the nexus of conservation and fishery management: eco-certification. Drawing on lessons learned from these empirical examples, we outline general processes necessary for clearly defining multiple conservation and fisheries objectives in working seascapes. By bridging the divide, we illuminate the process of navigating trade-offs between multiple objectives in a finite world.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)251-274
Number of pages24
JournalBulletin of Marine Science
Volume87
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2011

Fingerprint

fishery
fisheries
fisheries management
fishery management
ecosystems
marine policy
fishery production
overfishing
bycatch
certification
livelihood
food production
food security
ecosystem dynamics
future prospect
conservation management
quantitative analysis
conservation areas
researchers
science

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Aquatic Science
  • Oceanography

Cite this

Salomon, A. K., Gaichas, S. K., Jensen, O. P., Agostini, V. N., Sloan, N. A., Rice, J., ... Babcock, E. A. (2011). Bridging the divide between fisheries and marine conservation science. Bulletin of Marine Science, 87(2), 251-274. https://doi.org/10.5343/bms.2010.1089

Bridging the divide between fisheries and marine conservation science. / Salomon, Anne K.; Gaichas, Sarah K.; Jensen, Olaf P.; Agostini, Vera N.; Sloan, N. A.; Rice, Jake; McClanahan, Tim R.; Ruckelshaus, Mary H.; Levin, Phil S.; Dulvy, Nicholas K.; Babcock, Elizabeth A.

In: Bulletin of Marine Science, Vol. 87, No. 2, 01.04.2011, p. 251-274.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Salomon, AK, Gaichas, SK, Jensen, OP, Agostini, VN, Sloan, NA, Rice, J, McClanahan, TR, Ruckelshaus, MH, Levin, PS, Dulvy, NK & Babcock, EA 2011, 'Bridging the divide between fisheries and marine conservation science', Bulletin of Marine Science, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 251-274. https://doi.org/10.5343/bms.2010.1089
Salomon AK, Gaichas SK, Jensen OP, Agostini VN, Sloan NA, Rice J et al. Bridging the divide between fisheries and marine conservation science. Bulletin of Marine Science. 2011 Apr 1;87(2):251-274. https://doi.org/10.5343/bms.2010.1089
Salomon, Anne K. ; Gaichas, Sarah K. ; Jensen, Olaf P. ; Agostini, Vera N. ; Sloan, N. A. ; Rice, Jake ; McClanahan, Tim R. ; Ruckelshaus, Mary H. ; Levin, Phil S. ; Dulvy, Nicholas K. ; Babcock, Elizabeth A. / Bridging the divide between fisheries and marine conservation science. In: Bulletin of Marine Science. 2011 ; Vol. 87, No. 2. pp. 251-274.
@article{dc634c325c1a4c308aa64e2a4bc0c7ea,
title = "Bridging the divide between fisheries and marine conservation science",
abstract = "Researchers from traditionally disparate disciplines and practitioners with typically incongruent mandates have begun working together to better understand and solve marine conservation and sustainable yield problems. Conservation practitioners are recognizing the need to achieve conservation goals in seascapes that are a source of livelihood and food security, while fisheries management is realizing that achieving economically and ecologically sustainable fisheries requires an understanding of the role of biodiversity and ecosystem dynamics in fishery production. Yet, tensions still exist due to the unique histories, epistemologies, cultures, values, and quantitative techniques of fisheries and marine conservation science, and the often-divergent objectives of the institutions and organizations these academic disciplines inform. While there is general agreement on what needs to be achieved (less overfishing, recovery of depleted fish stocks, reduction in bycatch and habitat impacts, jobs, food production), specific objectives and how best to achieve them remain contentious and unresolved. By analyzing three contemporary yet controversial marine policies (ecosystem-based fishery management, marine protected areas, and catch shares) and specific case studies, we demonstrate how both fisheries and marine conservation science can be used to provide clear scientific advice to practitioners and provide empirical evidence of the benefits of bridging the disciplinary divide. Finally, we discuss future prospects for collaboration in an emerging issue at the nexus of conservation and fishery management: eco-certification. Drawing on lessons learned from these empirical examples, we outline general processes necessary for clearly defining multiple conservation and fisheries objectives in working seascapes. By bridging the divide, we illuminate the process of navigating trade-offs between multiple objectives in a finite world.",
author = "Salomon, {Anne K.} and Gaichas, {Sarah K.} and Jensen, {Olaf P.} and Agostini, {Vera N.} and Sloan, {N. A.} and Jake Rice and McClanahan, {Tim R.} and Ruckelshaus, {Mary H.} and Levin, {Phil S.} and Dulvy, {Nicholas K.} and Babcock, {Elizabeth A}",
year = "2011",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5343/bms.2010.1089",
language = "English",
volume = "87",
pages = "251--274",
journal = "Bulletin of Marine Science",
issn = "0007-4977",
publisher = "Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bridging the divide between fisheries and marine conservation science

AU - Salomon, Anne K.

AU - Gaichas, Sarah K.

AU - Jensen, Olaf P.

AU - Agostini, Vera N.

AU - Sloan, N. A.

AU - Rice, Jake

AU - McClanahan, Tim R.

AU - Ruckelshaus, Mary H.

AU - Levin, Phil S.

AU - Dulvy, Nicholas K.

AU - Babcock, Elizabeth A

PY - 2011/4/1

Y1 - 2011/4/1

N2 - Researchers from traditionally disparate disciplines and practitioners with typically incongruent mandates have begun working together to better understand and solve marine conservation and sustainable yield problems. Conservation practitioners are recognizing the need to achieve conservation goals in seascapes that are a source of livelihood and food security, while fisheries management is realizing that achieving economically and ecologically sustainable fisheries requires an understanding of the role of biodiversity and ecosystem dynamics in fishery production. Yet, tensions still exist due to the unique histories, epistemologies, cultures, values, and quantitative techniques of fisheries and marine conservation science, and the often-divergent objectives of the institutions and organizations these academic disciplines inform. While there is general agreement on what needs to be achieved (less overfishing, recovery of depleted fish stocks, reduction in bycatch and habitat impacts, jobs, food production), specific objectives and how best to achieve them remain contentious and unresolved. By analyzing three contemporary yet controversial marine policies (ecosystem-based fishery management, marine protected areas, and catch shares) and specific case studies, we demonstrate how both fisheries and marine conservation science can be used to provide clear scientific advice to practitioners and provide empirical evidence of the benefits of bridging the disciplinary divide. Finally, we discuss future prospects for collaboration in an emerging issue at the nexus of conservation and fishery management: eco-certification. Drawing on lessons learned from these empirical examples, we outline general processes necessary for clearly defining multiple conservation and fisheries objectives in working seascapes. By bridging the divide, we illuminate the process of navigating trade-offs between multiple objectives in a finite world.

AB - Researchers from traditionally disparate disciplines and practitioners with typically incongruent mandates have begun working together to better understand and solve marine conservation and sustainable yield problems. Conservation practitioners are recognizing the need to achieve conservation goals in seascapes that are a source of livelihood and food security, while fisheries management is realizing that achieving economically and ecologically sustainable fisheries requires an understanding of the role of biodiversity and ecosystem dynamics in fishery production. Yet, tensions still exist due to the unique histories, epistemologies, cultures, values, and quantitative techniques of fisheries and marine conservation science, and the often-divergent objectives of the institutions and organizations these academic disciplines inform. While there is general agreement on what needs to be achieved (less overfishing, recovery of depleted fish stocks, reduction in bycatch and habitat impacts, jobs, food production), specific objectives and how best to achieve them remain contentious and unresolved. By analyzing three contemporary yet controversial marine policies (ecosystem-based fishery management, marine protected areas, and catch shares) and specific case studies, we demonstrate how both fisheries and marine conservation science can be used to provide clear scientific advice to practitioners and provide empirical evidence of the benefits of bridging the disciplinary divide. Finally, we discuss future prospects for collaboration in an emerging issue at the nexus of conservation and fishery management: eco-certification. Drawing on lessons learned from these empirical examples, we outline general processes necessary for clearly defining multiple conservation and fisheries objectives in working seascapes. By bridging the divide, we illuminate the process of navigating trade-offs between multiple objectives in a finite world.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79955529352&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79955529352&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5343/bms.2010.1089

DO - 10.5343/bms.2010.1089

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79955529352

VL - 87

SP - 251

EP - 274

JO - Bulletin of Marine Science

JF - Bulletin of Marine Science

SN - 0007-4977

IS - 2

ER -