Blood pressure during induction and termination of the dorsal immobility response

Barry Hurwitz, Ronald L. Smith, Merle E. Meyer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Evidence has indicated that afferent baroreceptor input may play a role in the induction of the dorsal and tonic immobility responses, which are behaviorally similar, but involve opposite posture changes upon induction (i.e., upright versus inverted, respectively). Information is lacking on the topography of the blood pressure response during periods of dorsal immobility. The blood pressure response of the adult Wistar rat during induction and termination of dorsal immobility was compared to the blood pressure response during a condition which controlled for posture change. Each animal received two control trials, ten dorsal immobility trials and then two control trials in two successive sessions four and ten days after surgery. A precise second-by-second topographical analysis of the dorsal immobility response revealed a sharp rise in blood pressure at trial onset of 18.4 mmHg, followed by a return below pretrial levels and then subsequent recovery back to pretrial levels by the tenth-trial second. This level was maintained until the last five seconds of immobility when a rapid blood pressure elevation occurred. This terminating elevation correlated highly with the observation of large movement and probably reflected motor activity that eventually culminated in escape from immobility. The vertical posture change of the control condition, on the other hand, resulted in a gradual diminution of blood pressure, which implied that the initial blood pressure elevation during initiation of the dorsal immobility response could not be accounted for simply by posture change. In view of the similarity between the tonic and dorsal immobility blood pressure responses despite opposite postural changes, it was suggested that the blood pressure changes at induction of dorsal immobility probably did not reflect a response to afferent baroreceptor input.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)671-675
Number of pages5
JournalPhysiology and Behavior
Volume45
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1989
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Blood Pressure
Posture
Pressoreceptors
Tonic Immobility Response
Ambulatory Surgical Procedures
Wistar Rats
Motor Activity
Observation

Keywords

  • Baroreceptor
  • Blood pressure
  • Dorsal immobility
  • Posture
  • Tonic immobility

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology (medical)
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Blood pressure during induction and termination of the dorsal immobility response. / Hurwitz, Barry; Smith, Ronald L.; Meyer, Merle E.

In: Physiology and Behavior, Vol. 45, No. 3, 01.01.1989, p. 671-675.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hurwitz, Barry ; Smith, Ronald L. ; Meyer, Merle E. / Blood pressure during induction and termination of the dorsal immobility response. In: Physiology and Behavior. 1989 ; Vol. 45, No. 3. pp. 671-675.
@article{ca0c13fb07834a2697d1f23fb18e4aa5,
title = "Blood pressure during induction and termination of the dorsal immobility response",
abstract = "Evidence has indicated that afferent baroreceptor input may play a role in the induction of the dorsal and tonic immobility responses, which are behaviorally similar, but involve opposite posture changes upon induction (i.e., upright versus inverted, respectively). Information is lacking on the topography of the blood pressure response during periods of dorsal immobility. The blood pressure response of the adult Wistar rat during induction and termination of dorsal immobility was compared to the blood pressure response during a condition which controlled for posture change. Each animal received two control trials, ten dorsal immobility trials and then two control trials in two successive sessions four and ten days after surgery. A precise second-by-second topographical analysis of the dorsal immobility response revealed a sharp rise in blood pressure at trial onset of 18.4 mmHg, followed by a return below pretrial levels and then subsequent recovery back to pretrial levels by the tenth-trial second. This level was maintained until the last five seconds of immobility when a rapid blood pressure elevation occurred. This terminating elevation correlated highly with the observation of large movement and probably reflected motor activity that eventually culminated in escape from immobility. The vertical posture change of the control condition, on the other hand, resulted in a gradual diminution of blood pressure, which implied that the initial blood pressure elevation during initiation of the dorsal immobility response could not be accounted for simply by posture change. In view of the similarity between the tonic and dorsal immobility blood pressure responses despite opposite postural changes, it was suggested that the blood pressure changes at induction of dorsal immobility probably did not reflect a response to afferent baroreceptor input.",
keywords = "Baroreceptor, Blood pressure, Dorsal immobility, Posture, Tonic immobility",
author = "Barry Hurwitz and Smith, {Ronald L.} and Meyer, {Merle E.}",
year = "1989",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/0031-9384(89)90090-5",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "671--675",
journal = "Physiology and Behavior",
issn = "0031-9384",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Blood pressure during induction and termination of the dorsal immobility response

AU - Hurwitz, Barry

AU - Smith, Ronald L.

AU - Meyer, Merle E.

PY - 1989/1/1

Y1 - 1989/1/1

N2 - Evidence has indicated that afferent baroreceptor input may play a role in the induction of the dorsal and tonic immobility responses, which are behaviorally similar, but involve opposite posture changes upon induction (i.e., upright versus inverted, respectively). Information is lacking on the topography of the blood pressure response during periods of dorsal immobility. The blood pressure response of the adult Wistar rat during induction and termination of dorsal immobility was compared to the blood pressure response during a condition which controlled for posture change. Each animal received two control trials, ten dorsal immobility trials and then two control trials in two successive sessions four and ten days after surgery. A precise second-by-second topographical analysis of the dorsal immobility response revealed a sharp rise in blood pressure at trial onset of 18.4 mmHg, followed by a return below pretrial levels and then subsequent recovery back to pretrial levels by the tenth-trial second. This level was maintained until the last five seconds of immobility when a rapid blood pressure elevation occurred. This terminating elevation correlated highly with the observation of large movement and probably reflected motor activity that eventually culminated in escape from immobility. The vertical posture change of the control condition, on the other hand, resulted in a gradual diminution of blood pressure, which implied that the initial blood pressure elevation during initiation of the dorsal immobility response could not be accounted for simply by posture change. In view of the similarity between the tonic and dorsal immobility blood pressure responses despite opposite postural changes, it was suggested that the blood pressure changes at induction of dorsal immobility probably did not reflect a response to afferent baroreceptor input.

AB - Evidence has indicated that afferent baroreceptor input may play a role in the induction of the dorsal and tonic immobility responses, which are behaviorally similar, but involve opposite posture changes upon induction (i.e., upright versus inverted, respectively). Information is lacking on the topography of the blood pressure response during periods of dorsal immobility. The blood pressure response of the adult Wistar rat during induction and termination of dorsal immobility was compared to the blood pressure response during a condition which controlled for posture change. Each animal received two control trials, ten dorsal immobility trials and then two control trials in two successive sessions four and ten days after surgery. A precise second-by-second topographical analysis of the dorsal immobility response revealed a sharp rise in blood pressure at trial onset of 18.4 mmHg, followed by a return below pretrial levels and then subsequent recovery back to pretrial levels by the tenth-trial second. This level was maintained until the last five seconds of immobility when a rapid blood pressure elevation occurred. This terminating elevation correlated highly with the observation of large movement and probably reflected motor activity that eventually culminated in escape from immobility. The vertical posture change of the control condition, on the other hand, resulted in a gradual diminution of blood pressure, which implied that the initial blood pressure elevation during initiation of the dorsal immobility response could not be accounted for simply by posture change. In view of the similarity between the tonic and dorsal immobility blood pressure responses despite opposite postural changes, it was suggested that the blood pressure changes at induction of dorsal immobility probably did not reflect a response to afferent baroreceptor input.

KW - Baroreceptor

KW - Blood pressure

KW - Dorsal immobility

KW - Posture

KW - Tonic immobility

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024555914&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024555914&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0031-9384(89)90090-5

DO - 10.1016/0031-9384(89)90090-5

M3 - Article

C2 - 2756062

AN - SCOPUS:0024555914

VL - 45

SP - 671

EP - 675

JO - Physiology and Behavior

JF - Physiology and Behavior

SN - 0031-9384

IS - 3

ER -