Bladder neck preservation and its impact on positive surgical margins during radical prostatectomy

Cosme A. Gomez, Mark S. Soloway, Francisco Civantos, Takahiko Hachiya

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

57 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To modify the bladder neck dissection during radical prostatectomy, in an effort to improve continence and diminish the incidence of anastomotic stricture, without compromising the primary surgical objective of complete cancer removal. Between December 1991 and August 1992, 50 patients underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy with anatomic dissection and preservation of the bladder neck and most proximal portion of the prostatic urethra, thus creating a mucosal cuff for anastomosis to the urethral stump. There was tumor at the inked margin in 18 patients (36%), however, in only 3 instances (6%) was there tumor at the bladder neck margin. In no instance was the bladder neck margin the only positive margin. At a minimum follow-up of six months, all patients are fully continent during routine activities, and in no patient has an anastomotic stricture developed. Anatomic dissection and preservation of the bladder neck and proximal urethra does not compromise surgical margins. We believe this technique may play a role in preservation of continence after radical prostatectomy and probably decreases the likelihood of anastomotic stricture, by allowing for a circumferential mucosa-to-mucosa anastomosis without the need for bladder neck reconstruction.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)689-693
Number of pages5
JournalUrology
Volume42
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1993

Fingerprint

Prostatectomy
Urinary Bladder
Pathologic Constriction
Urethra
Dissection
Mucous Membrane
Neck Dissection
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
Neoplasms
Neck
Margins of Excision
Incidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Bladder neck preservation and its impact on positive surgical margins during radical prostatectomy. / Gomez, Cosme A.; Soloway, Mark S.; Civantos, Francisco; Hachiya, Takahiko.

In: Urology, Vol. 42, No. 6, 01.01.1993, p. 689-693.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gomez, Cosme A. ; Soloway, Mark S. ; Civantos, Francisco ; Hachiya, Takahiko. / Bladder neck preservation and its impact on positive surgical margins during radical prostatectomy. In: Urology. 1993 ; Vol. 42, No. 6. pp. 689-693.
@article{c0f40c785c964cba8d090a3130b533ec,
title = "Bladder neck preservation and its impact on positive surgical margins during radical prostatectomy",
abstract = "To modify the bladder neck dissection during radical prostatectomy, in an effort to improve continence and diminish the incidence of anastomotic stricture, without compromising the primary surgical objective of complete cancer removal. Between December 1991 and August 1992, 50 patients underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy with anatomic dissection and preservation of the bladder neck and most proximal portion of the prostatic urethra, thus creating a mucosal cuff for anastomosis to the urethral stump. There was tumor at the inked margin in 18 patients (36{\%}), however, in only 3 instances (6{\%}) was there tumor at the bladder neck margin. In no instance was the bladder neck margin the only positive margin. At a minimum follow-up of six months, all patients are fully continent during routine activities, and in no patient has an anastomotic stricture developed. Anatomic dissection and preservation of the bladder neck and proximal urethra does not compromise surgical margins. We believe this technique may play a role in preservation of continence after radical prostatectomy and probably decreases the likelihood of anastomotic stricture, by allowing for a circumferential mucosa-to-mucosa anastomosis without the need for bladder neck reconstruction.",
author = "Gomez, {Cosme A.} and Soloway, {Mark S.} and Francisco Civantos and Takahiko Hachiya",
year = "1993",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/0090-4295(93)90534-H",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "689--693",
journal = "Urology",
issn = "0090-4295",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bladder neck preservation and its impact on positive surgical margins during radical prostatectomy

AU - Gomez, Cosme A.

AU - Soloway, Mark S.

AU - Civantos, Francisco

AU - Hachiya, Takahiko

PY - 1993/1/1

Y1 - 1993/1/1

N2 - To modify the bladder neck dissection during radical prostatectomy, in an effort to improve continence and diminish the incidence of anastomotic stricture, without compromising the primary surgical objective of complete cancer removal. Between December 1991 and August 1992, 50 patients underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy with anatomic dissection and preservation of the bladder neck and most proximal portion of the prostatic urethra, thus creating a mucosal cuff for anastomosis to the urethral stump. There was tumor at the inked margin in 18 patients (36%), however, in only 3 instances (6%) was there tumor at the bladder neck margin. In no instance was the bladder neck margin the only positive margin. At a minimum follow-up of six months, all patients are fully continent during routine activities, and in no patient has an anastomotic stricture developed. Anatomic dissection and preservation of the bladder neck and proximal urethra does not compromise surgical margins. We believe this technique may play a role in preservation of continence after radical prostatectomy and probably decreases the likelihood of anastomotic stricture, by allowing for a circumferential mucosa-to-mucosa anastomosis without the need for bladder neck reconstruction.

AB - To modify the bladder neck dissection during radical prostatectomy, in an effort to improve continence and diminish the incidence of anastomotic stricture, without compromising the primary surgical objective of complete cancer removal. Between December 1991 and August 1992, 50 patients underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy with anatomic dissection and preservation of the bladder neck and most proximal portion of the prostatic urethra, thus creating a mucosal cuff for anastomosis to the urethral stump. There was tumor at the inked margin in 18 patients (36%), however, in only 3 instances (6%) was there tumor at the bladder neck margin. In no instance was the bladder neck margin the only positive margin. At a minimum follow-up of six months, all patients are fully continent during routine activities, and in no patient has an anastomotic stricture developed. Anatomic dissection and preservation of the bladder neck and proximal urethra does not compromise surgical margins. We believe this technique may play a role in preservation of continence after radical prostatectomy and probably decreases the likelihood of anastomotic stricture, by allowing for a circumferential mucosa-to-mucosa anastomosis without the need for bladder neck reconstruction.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027136052&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027136052&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0090-4295(93)90534-H

DO - 10.1016/0090-4295(93)90534-H

M3 - Article

C2 - 7504850

AN - SCOPUS:0027136052

VL - 42

SP - 689

EP - 693

JO - Urology

JF - Urology

SN - 0090-4295

IS - 6

ER -