Birefringence of amylose and amylopectin in whole structural starches

Frank Baker, William J. Whelan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

THE view is current that unbranched amylose chains are responsible for the anisotropy of structural and fractionated starches1-3. (A review of this subject by S. Peat4 should be consulted.) This view has been influenced by the method of investigation employed. Thus the evidence from X-ray powder diagrams does not entirely coincide with that from the study of optical birefringence. Perfectly dry starches are stated5,6 to show an amorphous powder diagram though they still exhibit birefringence. The kind of product also matters. Thus, fractionated amylose may be deposited in a micro-crystalline form4, whereas amylopectin remains amorphous or statistically isotropic. But fractionation procedures may also determine physical states, so that no direct conclusion can be drawn concerning the anisotropy of amylopectin in raw structural starches. Thirdly, interpretation may also be prejudiced by theoretical assumptions regarding the structure of the branched high polymer. Thus the random branching postulated by Meyer1 would offer a resistance to crystallization absent from the models proposed by Staudinger7 or Haworth8.

Original languageEnglish
JournalNature
Volume166
Issue number4209
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 1950
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Amylopectin
Birefringence
Amylose
Anisotropy
Starch
Powders
Crystallization
Polymers
X-Rays

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Cite this

Birefringence of amylose and amylopectin in whole structural starches. / Baker, Frank; Whelan, William J.

In: Nature, Vol. 166, No. 4209, 01.12.1950.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7967cf682b7f4312bcf4856822157fac,
title = "Birefringence of amylose and amylopectin in whole structural starches",
abstract = "THE view is current that unbranched amylose chains are responsible for the anisotropy of structural and fractionated starches1-3. (A review of this subject by S. Peat4 should be consulted.) This view has been influenced by the method of investigation employed. Thus the evidence from X-ray powder diagrams does not entirely coincide with that from the study of optical birefringence. Perfectly dry starches are stated5,6 to show an amorphous powder diagram though they still exhibit birefringence. The kind of product also matters. Thus, fractionated amylose may be deposited in a micro-crystalline form4, whereas amylopectin remains amorphous or statistically isotropic. But fractionation procedures may also determine physical states, so that no direct conclusion can be drawn concerning the anisotropy of amylopectin in raw structural starches. Thirdly, interpretation may also be prejudiced by theoretical assumptions regarding the structure of the branched high polymer. Thus the random branching postulated by Meyer1 would offer a resistance to crystallization absent from the models proposed by Staudinger7 or Haworth8.",
author = "Frank Baker and Whelan, {William J.}",
year = "1950",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1038/166034a0",
language = "English",
volume = "166",
journal = "Nature",
issn = "0028-0836",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "4209",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Birefringence of amylose and amylopectin in whole structural starches

AU - Baker, Frank

AU - Whelan, William J.

PY - 1950/12/1

Y1 - 1950/12/1

N2 - THE view is current that unbranched amylose chains are responsible for the anisotropy of structural and fractionated starches1-3. (A review of this subject by S. Peat4 should be consulted.) This view has been influenced by the method of investigation employed. Thus the evidence from X-ray powder diagrams does not entirely coincide with that from the study of optical birefringence. Perfectly dry starches are stated5,6 to show an amorphous powder diagram though they still exhibit birefringence. The kind of product also matters. Thus, fractionated amylose may be deposited in a micro-crystalline form4, whereas amylopectin remains amorphous or statistically isotropic. But fractionation procedures may also determine physical states, so that no direct conclusion can be drawn concerning the anisotropy of amylopectin in raw structural starches. Thirdly, interpretation may also be prejudiced by theoretical assumptions regarding the structure of the branched high polymer. Thus the random branching postulated by Meyer1 would offer a resistance to crystallization absent from the models proposed by Staudinger7 or Haworth8.

AB - THE view is current that unbranched amylose chains are responsible for the anisotropy of structural and fractionated starches1-3. (A review of this subject by S. Peat4 should be consulted.) This view has been influenced by the method of investigation employed. Thus the evidence from X-ray powder diagrams does not entirely coincide with that from the study of optical birefringence. Perfectly dry starches are stated5,6 to show an amorphous powder diagram though they still exhibit birefringence. The kind of product also matters. Thus, fractionated amylose may be deposited in a micro-crystalline form4, whereas amylopectin remains amorphous or statistically isotropic. But fractionation procedures may also determine physical states, so that no direct conclusion can be drawn concerning the anisotropy of amylopectin in raw structural starches. Thirdly, interpretation may also be prejudiced by theoretical assumptions regarding the structure of the branched high polymer. Thus the random branching postulated by Meyer1 would offer a resistance to crystallization absent from the models proposed by Staudinger7 or Haworth8.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=36949088195&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=36949088195&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/166034a0

DO - 10.1038/166034a0

M3 - Article

C2 - 15439105

AN - SCOPUS:36949088195

VL - 166

JO - Nature

JF - Nature

SN - 0028-0836

IS - 4209

ER -