Biopsy criteria for determining appropriateness for active surveillance in the modern era

Oleksandr Kryvenko, H. Ballentine Carter, Bruce J. Trock, Jonathan I. Epstein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

73 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective To evaluate algorithms to predict insignificant prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy (RP). Methods Five hundred and fifty men (410 Caucasian, 100 African American [AA], and 40 others) with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level <10 ng/dL, T1c, 12-core biopsy, and biopsy Gleason score 3 + 3 = 6 were categorized into training and validation sets. Six biopsy algorithms were tested for predicting insignificant (0.5 cm3, organ confined, and Gleason score ≤6) cancer at RP. Cancers incorrectly predicted to be insignificant were ranked into 4 groups of increasing aggressiveness. Results Original (Gleason score 6, PSA density ≤0.15, 2 positive cores, and maximum core involvement ≤50%) and modified Epstein criteria (Gleason score 6, PSA density ≤0.15, 2 positive cores, and unilateral cancer) had the highest negative predictive values - correct classification of insignificant cancer. Among cancers predicted to be insignificant in Caucasians, 29.9% cases using the original and 27% cases using the modified Epstein criteria had significant cancer at RP. However, more adverse findings at RP were misclassified as insignificant in only 3.5% and 2.2% of cases using the original and modified Epstein criteria, respectively. Of cancers predicted insignificant in AA men, 54.1% cases using the original and 51.6% cases using the modified Epstein criteria were misclassified as insignificant. Dominant anterior tumors were seen in 117 Caucasian (28.5%) and 44 AA men (44%). Conclusion The Epstein criteria maintain their accuracy in the modern era with extended biopsy sampling. The negative predictive values are lower in AA men, in part due to higher frequency of anterior tumors, where multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging should be recommended in AAs considering surveillance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)869-874
Number of pages6
JournalUrology
Volume83
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Biopsy
Neoplasm Grading
Prostatectomy
African Americans
Neoplasms
Prostate-Specific Antigen
Prostatic Neoplasms
Magnetic Resonance Imaging

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Biopsy criteria for determining appropriateness for active surveillance in the modern era. / Kryvenko, Oleksandr; Carter, H. Ballentine; Trock, Bruce J.; Epstein, Jonathan I.

In: Urology, Vol. 83, No. 4, 2014, p. 869-874.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kryvenko, Oleksandr ; Carter, H. Ballentine ; Trock, Bruce J. ; Epstein, Jonathan I. / Biopsy criteria for determining appropriateness for active surveillance in the modern era. In: Urology. 2014 ; Vol. 83, No. 4. pp. 869-874.
@article{3e9d2f825bff49e1afbcbb2743025d9d,
title = "Biopsy criteria for determining appropriateness for active surveillance in the modern era",
abstract = "Objective To evaluate algorithms to predict insignificant prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy (RP). Methods Five hundred and fifty men (410 Caucasian, 100 African American [AA], and 40 others) with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level <10 ng/dL, T1c, 12-core biopsy, and biopsy Gleason score 3 + 3 = 6 were categorized into training and validation sets. Six biopsy algorithms were tested for predicting insignificant (0.5 cm3, organ confined, and Gleason score ≤6) cancer at RP. Cancers incorrectly predicted to be insignificant were ranked into 4 groups of increasing aggressiveness. Results Original (Gleason score 6, PSA density ≤0.15, 2 positive cores, and maximum core involvement ≤50{\%}) and modified Epstein criteria (Gleason score 6, PSA density ≤0.15, 2 positive cores, and unilateral cancer) had the highest negative predictive values - correct classification of insignificant cancer. Among cancers predicted to be insignificant in Caucasians, 29.9{\%} cases using the original and 27{\%} cases using the modified Epstein criteria had significant cancer at RP. However, more adverse findings at RP were misclassified as insignificant in only 3.5{\%} and 2.2{\%} of cases using the original and modified Epstein criteria, respectively. Of cancers predicted insignificant in AA men, 54.1{\%} cases using the original and 51.6{\%} cases using the modified Epstein criteria were misclassified as insignificant. Dominant anterior tumors were seen in 117 Caucasian (28.5{\%}) and 44 AA men (44{\%}). Conclusion The Epstein criteria maintain their accuracy in the modern era with extended biopsy sampling. The negative predictive values are lower in AA men, in part due to higher frequency of anterior tumors, where multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging should be recommended in AAs considering surveillance.",
author = "Oleksandr Kryvenko and Carter, {H. Ballentine} and Trock, {Bruce J.} and Epstein, {Jonathan I.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.urology.2013.12.054",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "83",
pages = "869--874",
journal = "Urology",
issn = "0090-4295",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biopsy criteria for determining appropriateness for active surveillance in the modern era

AU - Kryvenko, Oleksandr

AU - Carter, H. Ballentine

AU - Trock, Bruce J.

AU - Epstein, Jonathan I.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Objective To evaluate algorithms to predict insignificant prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy (RP). Methods Five hundred and fifty men (410 Caucasian, 100 African American [AA], and 40 others) with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level <10 ng/dL, T1c, 12-core biopsy, and biopsy Gleason score 3 + 3 = 6 were categorized into training and validation sets. Six biopsy algorithms were tested for predicting insignificant (0.5 cm3, organ confined, and Gleason score ≤6) cancer at RP. Cancers incorrectly predicted to be insignificant were ranked into 4 groups of increasing aggressiveness. Results Original (Gleason score 6, PSA density ≤0.15, 2 positive cores, and maximum core involvement ≤50%) and modified Epstein criteria (Gleason score 6, PSA density ≤0.15, 2 positive cores, and unilateral cancer) had the highest negative predictive values - correct classification of insignificant cancer. Among cancers predicted to be insignificant in Caucasians, 29.9% cases using the original and 27% cases using the modified Epstein criteria had significant cancer at RP. However, more adverse findings at RP were misclassified as insignificant in only 3.5% and 2.2% of cases using the original and modified Epstein criteria, respectively. Of cancers predicted insignificant in AA men, 54.1% cases using the original and 51.6% cases using the modified Epstein criteria were misclassified as insignificant. Dominant anterior tumors were seen in 117 Caucasian (28.5%) and 44 AA men (44%). Conclusion The Epstein criteria maintain their accuracy in the modern era with extended biopsy sampling. The negative predictive values are lower in AA men, in part due to higher frequency of anterior tumors, where multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging should be recommended in AAs considering surveillance.

AB - Objective To evaluate algorithms to predict insignificant prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy (RP). Methods Five hundred and fifty men (410 Caucasian, 100 African American [AA], and 40 others) with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level <10 ng/dL, T1c, 12-core biopsy, and biopsy Gleason score 3 + 3 = 6 were categorized into training and validation sets. Six biopsy algorithms were tested for predicting insignificant (0.5 cm3, organ confined, and Gleason score ≤6) cancer at RP. Cancers incorrectly predicted to be insignificant were ranked into 4 groups of increasing aggressiveness. Results Original (Gleason score 6, PSA density ≤0.15, 2 positive cores, and maximum core involvement ≤50%) and modified Epstein criteria (Gleason score 6, PSA density ≤0.15, 2 positive cores, and unilateral cancer) had the highest negative predictive values - correct classification of insignificant cancer. Among cancers predicted to be insignificant in Caucasians, 29.9% cases using the original and 27% cases using the modified Epstein criteria had significant cancer at RP. However, more adverse findings at RP were misclassified as insignificant in only 3.5% and 2.2% of cases using the original and modified Epstein criteria, respectively. Of cancers predicted insignificant in AA men, 54.1% cases using the original and 51.6% cases using the modified Epstein criteria were misclassified as insignificant. Dominant anterior tumors were seen in 117 Caucasian (28.5%) and 44 AA men (44%). Conclusion The Epstein criteria maintain their accuracy in the modern era with extended biopsy sampling. The negative predictive values are lower in AA men, in part due to higher frequency of anterior tumors, where multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging should be recommended in AAs considering surveillance.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84897132627&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84897132627&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.urology.2013.12.054

DO - 10.1016/j.urology.2013.12.054

M3 - Article

C2 - 24680457

AN - SCOPUS:84897132627

VL - 83

SP - 869

EP - 874

JO - Urology

JF - Urology

SN - 0090-4295

IS - 4

ER -