Bioethical considerations in translational research: Primate stroke

Michael E. Sughrue, J. Mocco, Willam J. Mack, Andrew F. Ducruet, Ricardo J. Komotar, Ruth L. Fischbach, Thomas E. Martin, E. Sander Connolly

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Scopus citations

Abstract

Controversy and activism have long been linked to the subject of primate research. Even in the midst of raging ethical debates surrounding fertility treatments, genetically modified foods and stem-cell research, there has been no reduction in the campaigns of activists worldwide. Plying their trade of intimidation aimed at ending biomedical experimentation in all animals, they have succeeded in creating an environment where research institutions, often painted as guilty until proven innocent, have avoided addressing the issue for fear of becoming targets. One area of intense debate is the use of primates in stroke research. Despite the fact that stroke kills more people each year than AIDS and malaria, and less than 5% of patients are candidates for current therapies, there is significant opposition to primate stroke research. A balanced examination of the ethics of primate stroke research is thus of broad interest to all areas of biomedical research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3-12
Number of pages10
JournalAmerican Journal of Bioethics
Volume9
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2009
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Ethics
  • Neuroprotection
  • Primate
  • Research
  • Stroke

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects
  • Medicine(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Bioethical considerations in translational research: Primate stroke'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Sughrue, M. E., Mocco, J., Mack, W. J., Ducruet, A. F., Komotar, R. J., Fischbach, R. L., Martin, T. E., & Connolly, E. S. (2009). Bioethical considerations in translational research: Primate stroke. American Journal of Bioethics, 9(5), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265160902788652