Bilateral mastectomy and the retreat from breast-conserving surgery

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to assess the consequences for breast cancer patients of the trend away from breast conservation in favor of bilateral and contralateral mastectomy. The methods are followed from the review of the literature from 1991 to 2015. Breast-conserving surgery and sentinel lymph node biopsy, introduced into mainstream practice in the 1980s and 1990s, respectively, are now the standard of care for early-stage breast cancer. Disruptive change has unexpectedly supervened in the guise of bilateral mastectomy for cancer or prophylaxis and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. These operations are now being resorted to at a rate which cannot be explained by any of the biological imperatives related to breast cancer and related diseases. This phenomenon extends across the Western world and beyond, driven by patients’ cancer concern, a misunderstanding of what surgery can and cannot achieve and preserve, and the current popular media/cultural environment. These developments and their consequences for patients are reviewed. Surgical complications, especially those related to reconstruction, are unusually common. Of equal or greater concern are the physical, esthetic, psychosocial, psychosexual morbidities, and other adverse sequelae of these operations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-16
Number of pages16
JournalBreast Cancer Research and Treatment
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jul 30 2016

Keywords

  • Bilateral mastectomy (BM)
  • Breast cancer
  • Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Bilateral mastectomy and the retreat from breast-conserving surgery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this