Bibliometrics

Tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics

Ashok Agarwal, Damayanthi Durairajanayagam, Sindhuja Tatagari, Sandro C. Esteves, Avi Harlev, Ralf Henkel, Shubhadeep Roychoudhury, Sheryl Homa, Nicolás Garrido Puchalt, Ranjith Ramasamy, Ahmad Majzoub, Kim Dao Ly, Eva Tvrda, Mourad Assidi, Kavindra Kesari, Reecha Sharma, Saleem Banihani, Edmund Ko, Muhammad Abu-Elmagd, Jaime Gosalvez & 1 others Asher Bashiri

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

56 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Traditionally, the success of a researcher is assessed by the number of publications he or she publishes in peer-reviewed, indexed, high impact journals. This essential yardstick, often referred to as the impact of a specific researcher, is assessed through the use of various metrics. While researchers may be acquainted with such matrices, many do not know how to use them to enhance their careers. In addition to these metrics, a number of other factors should be taken into consideration to objectively evaluate a scientist′s profile as a researcher and academician. Moreover, each metric has its own limitations that need to be considered when selecting an appropriate metric for evaluation. This paper provides a broad overview of the wide array of metrics currently in use in academia and research. Popular metrics are discussed and defined, including traditional metrics and article-level metrics, some of which are applied to researchers for a greater understanding of a particular concept, including varicocele that is the thematic area of this Special Issue of Asian Journal of Andrology. We recommend the combined use of quantitative and qualitative evaluation using judiciously selected metrics for a more objective assessment of scholarly output and research impact.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)296-309
Number of pages14
JournalAsian Journal of Andrology
Volume18
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2016

Fingerprint

Bibliometrics
Research Personnel
Research
Andrology
Varicocele
Publications

Keywords

  • article-level metrics
  • bibliometrics
  • citation counts
  • h-index
  • impact factor
  • research databases
  • research impact
  • research productivity
  • traditional metrics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Agarwal, A., Durairajanayagam, D., Tatagari, S., Esteves, S. C., Harlev, A., Henkel, R., ... Bashiri, A. (2016). Bibliometrics: Tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics. Asian Journal of Andrology, 18(2), 296-309. https://doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.171582

Bibliometrics : Tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics. / Agarwal, Ashok; Durairajanayagam, Damayanthi; Tatagari, Sindhuja; Esteves, Sandro C.; Harlev, Avi; Henkel, Ralf; Roychoudhury, Shubhadeep; Homa, Sheryl; Puchalt, Nicolás Garrido; Ramasamy, Ranjith; Majzoub, Ahmad; Dao Ly, Kim; Tvrda, Eva; Assidi, Mourad; Kesari, Kavindra; Sharma, Reecha; Banihani, Saleem; Ko, Edmund; Abu-Elmagd, Muhammad; Gosalvez, Jaime; Bashiri, Asher.

In: Asian Journal of Andrology, Vol. 18, No. 2, 01.03.2016, p. 296-309.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Agarwal, A, Durairajanayagam, D, Tatagari, S, Esteves, SC, Harlev, A, Henkel, R, Roychoudhury, S, Homa, S, Puchalt, NG, Ramasamy, R, Majzoub, A, Dao Ly, K, Tvrda, E, Assidi, M, Kesari, K, Sharma, R, Banihani, S, Ko, E, Abu-Elmagd, M, Gosalvez, J & Bashiri, A 2016, 'Bibliometrics: Tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics', Asian Journal of Andrology, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 296-309. https://doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.171582
Agarwal A, Durairajanayagam D, Tatagari S, Esteves SC, Harlev A, Henkel R et al. Bibliometrics: Tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics. Asian Journal of Andrology. 2016 Mar 1;18(2):296-309. https://doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.171582
Agarwal, Ashok ; Durairajanayagam, Damayanthi ; Tatagari, Sindhuja ; Esteves, Sandro C. ; Harlev, Avi ; Henkel, Ralf ; Roychoudhury, Shubhadeep ; Homa, Sheryl ; Puchalt, Nicolás Garrido ; Ramasamy, Ranjith ; Majzoub, Ahmad ; Dao Ly, Kim ; Tvrda, Eva ; Assidi, Mourad ; Kesari, Kavindra ; Sharma, Reecha ; Banihani, Saleem ; Ko, Edmund ; Abu-Elmagd, Muhammad ; Gosalvez, Jaime ; Bashiri, Asher. / Bibliometrics : Tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics. In: Asian Journal of Andrology. 2016 ; Vol. 18, No. 2. pp. 296-309.
@article{e93152a3464f441ebae978da91b65f6a,
title = "Bibliometrics: Tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics",
abstract = "Traditionally, the success of a researcher is assessed by the number of publications he or she publishes in peer-reviewed, indexed, high impact journals. This essential yardstick, often referred to as the impact of a specific researcher, is assessed through the use of various metrics. While researchers may be acquainted with such matrices, many do not know how to use them to enhance their careers. In addition to these metrics, a number of other factors should be taken into consideration to objectively evaluate a scientist′s profile as a researcher and academician. Moreover, each metric has its own limitations that need to be considered when selecting an appropriate metric for evaluation. This paper provides a broad overview of the wide array of metrics currently in use in academia and research. Popular metrics are discussed and defined, including traditional metrics and article-level metrics, some of which are applied to researchers for a greater understanding of a particular concept, including varicocele that is the thematic area of this Special Issue of Asian Journal of Andrology. We recommend the combined use of quantitative and qualitative evaluation using judiciously selected metrics for a more objective assessment of scholarly output and research impact.",
keywords = "article-level metrics, bibliometrics, citation counts, h-index, impact factor, research databases, research impact, research productivity, traditional metrics",
author = "Ashok Agarwal and Damayanthi Durairajanayagam and Sindhuja Tatagari and Esteves, {Sandro C.} and Avi Harlev and Ralf Henkel and Shubhadeep Roychoudhury and Sheryl Homa and Puchalt, {Nicol{\'a}s Garrido} and Ranjith Ramasamy and Ahmad Majzoub and {Dao Ly}, Kim and Eva Tvrda and Mourad Assidi and Kavindra Kesari and Reecha Sharma and Saleem Banihani and Edmund Ko and Muhammad Abu-Elmagd and Jaime Gosalvez and Asher Bashiri",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4103/1008-682X.171582",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "296--309",
journal = "Asian Journal of Andrology",
issn = "1008-682X",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bibliometrics

T2 - Tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics

AU - Agarwal, Ashok

AU - Durairajanayagam, Damayanthi

AU - Tatagari, Sindhuja

AU - Esteves, Sandro C.

AU - Harlev, Avi

AU - Henkel, Ralf

AU - Roychoudhury, Shubhadeep

AU - Homa, Sheryl

AU - Puchalt, Nicolás Garrido

AU - Ramasamy, Ranjith

AU - Majzoub, Ahmad

AU - Dao Ly, Kim

AU - Tvrda, Eva

AU - Assidi, Mourad

AU - Kesari, Kavindra

AU - Sharma, Reecha

AU - Banihani, Saleem

AU - Ko, Edmund

AU - Abu-Elmagd, Muhammad

AU - Gosalvez, Jaime

AU - Bashiri, Asher

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - Traditionally, the success of a researcher is assessed by the number of publications he or she publishes in peer-reviewed, indexed, high impact journals. This essential yardstick, often referred to as the impact of a specific researcher, is assessed through the use of various metrics. While researchers may be acquainted with such matrices, many do not know how to use them to enhance their careers. In addition to these metrics, a number of other factors should be taken into consideration to objectively evaluate a scientist′s profile as a researcher and academician. Moreover, each metric has its own limitations that need to be considered when selecting an appropriate metric for evaluation. This paper provides a broad overview of the wide array of metrics currently in use in academia and research. Popular metrics are discussed and defined, including traditional metrics and article-level metrics, some of which are applied to researchers for a greater understanding of a particular concept, including varicocele that is the thematic area of this Special Issue of Asian Journal of Andrology. We recommend the combined use of quantitative and qualitative evaluation using judiciously selected metrics for a more objective assessment of scholarly output and research impact.

AB - Traditionally, the success of a researcher is assessed by the number of publications he or she publishes in peer-reviewed, indexed, high impact journals. This essential yardstick, often referred to as the impact of a specific researcher, is assessed through the use of various metrics. While researchers may be acquainted with such matrices, many do not know how to use them to enhance their careers. In addition to these metrics, a number of other factors should be taken into consideration to objectively evaluate a scientist′s profile as a researcher and academician. Moreover, each metric has its own limitations that need to be considered when selecting an appropriate metric for evaluation. This paper provides a broad overview of the wide array of metrics currently in use in academia and research. Popular metrics are discussed and defined, including traditional metrics and article-level metrics, some of which are applied to researchers for a greater understanding of a particular concept, including varicocele that is the thematic area of this Special Issue of Asian Journal of Andrology. We recommend the combined use of quantitative and qualitative evaluation using judiciously selected metrics for a more objective assessment of scholarly output and research impact.

KW - article-level metrics

KW - bibliometrics

KW - citation counts

KW - h-index

KW - impact factor

KW - research databases

KW - research impact

KW - research productivity

KW - traditional metrics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84957886782&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84957886782&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4103/1008-682X.171582

DO - 10.4103/1008-682X.171582

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 296

EP - 309

JO - Asian Journal of Andrology

JF - Asian Journal of Andrology

SN - 1008-682X

IS - 2

ER -