Beyond the permissibility of embryonic and stem cell research: Substantive requirements and procedural safeguards

Rosario Isasi, Bartha M. Knoppers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This report provides a comparative analysis of the regulation of embryonic stem cells and cloning research in 50 countries. The development of international stem cell consortia involving the exchange of materials, data and knowledge presumes 'policy know-how' on the varying positions and governing regulations of the various partners; knowledge is essential for the feasibility of such international collaborative projects. Across the spectrum of restrictive-to-liberal policies, requirements regarding the justification for or the setting of substantive limits on (i) embryo use and/or (ii) destruction in research are often present. These goals justify the regulation, the control and even the prohibition of embryonic stem cell and cloning research. Moreover, irrespective of whether a country adopts a restrictive or a liberal approach, there is significant symmetry in both the substantive and the procedural requirements. Procedural safeguards provide another layer of protection and control over the research. In reality, such safeguards may have a greater systemic impact than the substantive requirements. They can be subdivided into three broad categories: (i) safeguards relating to the stage of embryonic development, (ii) safeguards relating to the donors of blastocysts, gametes, embryos and somatic cells and (iii) requirements for research governance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2474-2481
Number of pages8
JournalHuman Reproduction
Volume21
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Stem Cell Research
Organism Cloning
Embryonic Structures
Research
Blastocyst
Germ Cells
Embryonic Development
Stem Cells

Keywords

  • Cloning
  • Ethics
  • Policy
  • Stem cells

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Beyond the permissibility of embryonic and stem cell research : Substantive requirements and procedural safeguards. / Isasi, Rosario; Knoppers, Bartha M.

In: Human Reproduction, Vol. 21, No. 10, 01.01.2006, p. 2474-2481.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c6b49a11addd490685d16e5e2b123783,
title = "Beyond the permissibility of embryonic and stem cell research: Substantive requirements and procedural safeguards",
abstract = "This report provides a comparative analysis of the regulation of embryonic stem cells and cloning research in 50 countries. The development of international stem cell consortia involving the exchange of materials, data and knowledge presumes 'policy know-how' on the varying positions and governing regulations of the various partners; knowledge is essential for the feasibility of such international collaborative projects. Across the spectrum of restrictive-to-liberal policies, requirements regarding the justification for or the setting of substantive limits on (i) embryo use and/or (ii) destruction in research are often present. These goals justify the regulation, the control and even the prohibition of embryonic stem cell and cloning research. Moreover, irrespective of whether a country adopts a restrictive or a liberal approach, there is significant symmetry in both the substantive and the procedural requirements. Procedural safeguards provide another layer of protection and control over the research. In reality, such safeguards may have a greater systemic impact than the substantive requirements. They can be subdivided into three broad categories: (i) safeguards relating to the stage of embryonic development, (ii) safeguards relating to the donors of blastocysts, gametes, embryos and somatic cells and (iii) requirements for research governance.",
keywords = "Cloning, Ethics, Policy, Stem cells",
author = "Rosario Isasi and Knoppers, {Bartha M.}",
year = "2006",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/humrep/del235",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "2474--2481",
journal = "Human Reproduction",
issn = "0268-1161",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beyond the permissibility of embryonic and stem cell research

T2 - Substantive requirements and procedural safeguards

AU - Isasi, Rosario

AU - Knoppers, Bartha M.

PY - 2006/1/1

Y1 - 2006/1/1

N2 - This report provides a comparative analysis of the regulation of embryonic stem cells and cloning research in 50 countries. The development of international stem cell consortia involving the exchange of materials, data and knowledge presumes 'policy know-how' on the varying positions and governing regulations of the various partners; knowledge is essential for the feasibility of such international collaborative projects. Across the spectrum of restrictive-to-liberal policies, requirements regarding the justification for or the setting of substantive limits on (i) embryo use and/or (ii) destruction in research are often present. These goals justify the regulation, the control and even the prohibition of embryonic stem cell and cloning research. Moreover, irrespective of whether a country adopts a restrictive or a liberal approach, there is significant symmetry in both the substantive and the procedural requirements. Procedural safeguards provide another layer of protection and control over the research. In reality, such safeguards may have a greater systemic impact than the substantive requirements. They can be subdivided into three broad categories: (i) safeguards relating to the stage of embryonic development, (ii) safeguards relating to the donors of blastocysts, gametes, embryos and somatic cells and (iii) requirements for research governance.

AB - This report provides a comparative analysis of the regulation of embryonic stem cells and cloning research in 50 countries. The development of international stem cell consortia involving the exchange of materials, data and knowledge presumes 'policy know-how' on the varying positions and governing regulations of the various partners; knowledge is essential for the feasibility of such international collaborative projects. Across the spectrum of restrictive-to-liberal policies, requirements regarding the justification for or the setting of substantive limits on (i) embryo use and/or (ii) destruction in research are often present. These goals justify the regulation, the control and even the prohibition of embryonic stem cell and cloning research. Moreover, irrespective of whether a country adopts a restrictive or a liberal approach, there is significant symmetry in both the substantive and the procedural requirements. Procedural safeguards provide another layer of protection and control over the research. In reality, such safeguards may have a greater systemic impact than the substantive requirements. They can be subdivided into three broad categories: (i) safeguards relating to the stage of embryonic development, (ii) safeguards relating to the donors of blastocysts, gametes, embryos and somatic cells and (iii) requirements for research governance.

KW - Cloning

KW - Ethics

KW - Policy

KW - Stem cells

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33749603964&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33749603964&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/humrep/del235

DO - 10.1093/humrep/del235

M3 - Article

C2 - 16877375

AN - SCOPUS:33749603964

VL - 21

SP - 2474

EP - 2481

JO - Human Reproduction

JF - Human Reproduction

SN - 0268-1161

IS - 10

ER -