Beyond plantations: Indian and African slavery in the Illinois country, 1720–1780

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article offers an analysis of Indigenous and African slavery in the Illinois Country during the eighteenth century. It shows that slavery did not operate as an institution and was not organized around plantation production, but that human bondage was a set of adaptable practices. Slavery took many forms, and masters had to adapt to that diversity and, in so doing, they forged a single, heterogeneous slave system. Frenchmen brought enslaved workers of African descent to the Illinois Country, and masters worked them on grain farms to sustain an export economy. In this way, Illinois’s economy shared much with the wider Atlantic World. Yet they had to revise their slaving practices in light of the reality that indigenous forms of bondage pre-dated their arrival. In Native North America, slavery operated as a kin-based system of captivity that could structure alliances and sustain local politics between diverse groups. Masters participated in this form of slavery, and incorporated Indigenous slaves into their economies. Rather than stressing the differences that existed between diverse forms of human bondage, this article moves beyond an institutional analysis of slavery to show how slavery’s many guises mutually defined each other across generations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)489-509
Number of pages21
JournalSlavery and Abolition
Volume38
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 3 2017

Fingerprint

slavery
slave
economy
Frenchman
local politics
eighteenth century
agricultural product
Africa
Slavery
Illinois
Plantation
farm
worker
Bondage
Economy
Group

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • History
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Beyond plantations : Indian and African slavery in the Illinois country, 1720–1780. / Heerman, Matthew.

In: Slavery and Abolition, Vol. 38, No. 3, 03.07.2017, p. 489-509.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b579963b48564b78be9f71cce4869f80,
title = "Beyond plantations: Indian and African slavery in the Illinois country, 1720–1780",
abstract = "This article offers an analysis of Indigenous and African slavery in the Illinois Country during the eighteenth century. It shows that slavery did not operate as an institution and was not organized around plantation production, but that human bondage was a set of adaptable practices. Slavery took many forms, and masters had to adapt to that diversity and, in so doing, they forged a single, heterogeneous slave system. Frenchmen brought enslaved workers of African descent to the Illinois Country, and masters worked them on grain farms to sustain an export economy. In this way, Illinois’s economy shared much with the wider Atlantic World. Yet they had to revise their slaving practices in light of the reality that indigenous forms of bondage pre-dated their arrival. In Native North America, slavery operated as a kin-based system of captivity that could structure alliances and sustain local politics between diverse groups. Masters participated in this form of slavery, and incorporated Indigenous slaves into their economies. Rather than stressing the differences that existed between diverse forms of human bondage, this article moves beyond an institutional analysis of slavery to show how slavery’s many guises mutually defined each other across generations.",
author = "Matthew Heerman",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/0144039X.2016.1252135",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "489--509",
journal = "Slavery and Abolition",
issn = "0144-039X",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beyond plantations

T2 - Indian and African slavery in the Illinois country, 1720–1780

AU - Heerman, Matthew

PY - 2017/7/3

Y1 - 2017/7/3

N2 - This article offers an analysis of Indigenous and African slavery in the Illinois Country during the eighteenth century. It shows that slavery did not operate as an institution and was not organized around plantation production, but that human bondage was a set of adaptable practices. Slavery took many forms, and masters had to adapt to that diversity and, in so doing, they forged a single, heterogeneous slave system. Frenchmen brought enslaved workers of African descent to the Illinois Country, and masters worked them on grain farms to sustain an export economy. In this way, Illinois’s economy shared much with the wider Atlantic World. Yet they had to revise their slaving practices in light of the reality that indigenous forms of bondage pre-dated their arrival. In Native North America, slavery operated as a kin-based system of captivity that could structure alliances and sustain local politics between diverse groups. Masters participated in this form of slavery, and incorporated Indigenous slaves into their economies. Rather than stressing the differences that existed between diverse forms of human bondage, this article moves beyond an institutional analysis of slavery to show how slavery’s many guises mutually defined each other across generations.

AB - This article offers an analysis of Indigenous and African slavery in the Illinois Country during the eighteenth century. It shows that slavery did not operate as an institution and was not organized around plantation production, but that human bondage was a set of adaptable practices. Slavery took many forms, and masters had to adapt to that diversity and, in so doing, they forged a single, heterogeneous slave system. Frenchmen brought enslaved workers of African descent to the Illinois Country, and masters worked them on grain farms to sustain an export economy. In this way, Illinois’s economy shared much with the wider Atlantic World. Yet they had to revise their slaving practices in light of the reality that indigenous forms of bondage pre-dated their arrival. In Native North America, slavery operated as a kin-based system of captivity that could structure alliances and sustain local politics between diverse groups. Masters participated in this form of slavery, and incorporated Indigenous slaves into their economies. Rather than stressing the differences that existed between diverse forms of human bondage, this article moves beyond an institutional analysis of slavery to show how slavery’s many guises mutually defined each other across generations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014787926&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85014787926&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/0144039X.2016.1252135

DO - 10.1080/0144039X.2016.1252135

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85014787926

VL - 38

SP - 489

EP - 509

JO - Slavery and Abolition

JF - Slavery and Abolition

SN - 0144-039X

IS - 3

ER -