Between prophylaxis and child abuse: The ethics of neonatal male circumcision

Michael G Benatar, David Benatar

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Opinion about neonatal male circumcision is deeply divided. Some take it to be a prophylactic measure with unequivocal and significant health benefits, while others consider it a form of child abuse. We argue against both these polar views. In doing so, we discuss whether circumcision constitutes bodily mutilation, whether the absence of the child's informed consent makes it wrong, the nature and strength of the evidence regarding medical harms and benefits, and what moral weight cultural considerations have. We conclude that nontherapeutic circumcision of infant boys is a suitable matter for parental discretion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe Right to Bodily Integrity
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages241-254
Number of pages14
ISBN (Electronic)9781315237367
ISBN (Print)9781409466079
DOIs
StatePublished - May 15 2017
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Medicine(all)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Between prophylaxis and child abuse: The ethics of neonatal male circumcision'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this