Between prophylaxis and child abuse: The ethics of neonatal male circumcision

Michael Benatar, David Benatar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

106 Scopus citations


Opinion about neonatal male circumcision is deeply divided. Some take it to be a prophylactic measure with unequivocal and significant health benefits, while others consider it a form of child abuse. We argue against both these polar views. In doing so, we discuss whether circumcision constitutes bodily mutilation, whether the absence of the child's informed consent makes it wrong, the nature and strength of the evidence regarding medical harms and benefits, and what moral weight cultural considerations have. We conclude that nontherapeutic circumcision of infant boys is a suitable matter for parental discretion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)35-48
Number of pages14
JournalAmerican Journal of Bioethics
Issue number2
StatePublished - Mar 2003
Externally publishedYes


  • Circumcision child abuse mutilation culture informed consent

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects
  • Health Policy


Dive into the research topics of 'Between prophylaxis and child abuse: The ethics of neonatal male circumcision'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this