Benefit-cost analysis of SBIRT interventions for substance using patients in emergency departments

Brady P. Horn, Cameron Crandall, Alyssa Forcehimes, Michael French, Michael Bogenschutz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) has been widely implemented as a method to address substance use disorders in general medical settings, and some evidence suggests that its use is associated with decreased societal costs. In this paper, we investigated the economic impact of SBIRT using data from Screening, Motivational Assessment, Referral, and Treatment in Emergency Departments (SMART-ED), a multisite, randomized controlled trial. Utilizing self-reported information on medical status, health services utilization, employment, and crime, we conduct a benefit-cost analysis. Findings indicate that neither of the SMART-ED interventions resulted in any significant changes to the main economic outcomes, nor had any significant impact on total economic benefit. Thus, while SBIRT interventions for substance abuse in Emergency Departments may be appealing from a clinical perspective, evidence from this economic study suggests resources could be better utilized supporting other health interventions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)6-11
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Substance Abuse Treatment
Volume79
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2017

Fingerprint

Cost-Benefit Analysis
Hospital Emergency Service
Referral and Consultation
Economics
Substance-Related Disorders
Therapeutics
Crime
Health Services
Randomized Controlled Trials
Costs and Cost Analysis
Health

Keywords

  • Benefit-cost analysis
  • Economic evaluation
  • SBIRT
  • Substance abuse

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Phychiatric Mental Health
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Benefit-cost analysis of SBIRT interventions for substance using patients in emergency departments. / Horn, Brady P.; Crandall, Cameron; Forcehimes, Alyssa; French, Michael; Bogenschutz, Michael.

In: Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, Vol. 79, 01.08.2017, p. 6-11.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Horn, Brady P. ; Crandall, Cameron ; Forcehimes, Alyssa ; French, Michael ; Bogenschutz, Michael. / Benefit-cost analysis of SBIRT interventions for substance using patients in emergency departments. In: Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2017 ; Vol. 79. pp. 6-11.
@article{47e658aedd6e4973bffcb44bc039d203,
title = "Benefit-cost analysis of SBIRT interventions for substance using patients in emergency departments",
abstract = "Screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) has been widely implemented as a method to address substance use disorders in general medical settings, and some evidence suggests that its use is associated with decreased societal costs. In this paper, we investigated the economic impact of SBIRT using data from Screening, Motivational Assessment, Referral, and Treatment in Emergency Departments (SMART-ED), a multisite, randomized controlled trial. Utilizing self-reported information on medical status, health services utilization, employment, and crime, we conduct a benefit-cost analysis. Findings indicate that neither of the SMART-ED interventions resulted in any significant changes to the main economic outcomes, nor had any significant impact on total economic benefit. Thus, while SBIRT interventions for substance abuse in Emergency Departments may be appealing from a clinical perspective, evidence from this economic study suggests resources could be better utilized supporting other health interventions.",
keywords = "Benefit-cost analysis, Economic evaluation, SBIRT, Substance abuse",
author = "Horn, {Brady P.} and Cameron Crandall and Alyssa Forcehimes and Michael French and Michael Bogenschutz",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jsat.2017.05.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "79",
pages = "6--11",
journal = "Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment",
issn = "0740-5472",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Benefit-cost analysis of SBIRT interventions for substance using patients in emergency departments

AU - Horn, Brady P.

AU - Crandall, Cameron

AU - Forcehimes, Alyssa

AU - French, Michael

AU - Bogenschutz, Michael

PY - 2017/8/1

Y1 - 2017/8/1

N2 - Screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) has been widely implemented as a method to address substance use disorders in general medical settings, and some evidence suggests that its use is associated with decreased societal costs. In this paper, we investigated the economic impact of SBIRT using data from Screening, Motivational Assessment, Referral, and Treatment in Emergency Departments (SMART-ED), a multisite, randomized controlled trial. Utilizing self-reported information on medical status, health services utilization, employment, and crime, we conduct a benefit-cost analysis. Findings indicate that neither of the SMART-ED interventions resulted in any significant changes to the main economic outcomes, nor had any significant impact on total economic benefit. Thus, while SBIRT interventions for substance abuse in Emergency Departments may be appealing from a clinical perspective, evidence from this economic study suggests resources could be better utilized supporting other health interventions.

AB - Screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) has been widely implemented as a method to address substance use disorders in general medical settings, and some evidence suggests that its use is associated with decreased societal costs. In this paper, we investigated the economic impact of SBIRT using data from Screening, Motivational Assessment, Referral, and Treatment in Emergency Departments (SMART-ED), a multisite, randomized controlled trial. Utilizing self-reported information on medical status, health services utilization, employment, and crime, we conduct a benefit-cost analysis. Findings indicate that neither of the SMART-ED interventions resulted in any significant changes to the main economic outcomes, nor had any significant impact on total economic benefit. Thus, while SBIRT interventions for substance abuse in Emergency Departments may be appealing from a clinical perspective, evidence from this economic study suggests resources could be better utilized supporting other health interventions.

KW - Benefit-cost analysis

KW - Economic evaluation

KW - SBIRT

KW - Substance abuse

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019442139&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019442139&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jsat.2017.05.003

DO - 10.1016/j.jsat.2017.05.003

M3 - Article

C2 - 28673528

AN - SCOPUS:85019442139

VL - 79

SP - 6

EP - 11

JO - Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment

JF - Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment

SN - 0740-5472

ER -