Bayesian benefit-risk analysis for sustainable process design

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A Bayesian model for assessing uncertain and variable economics of proposed environmentally conscious and other manufacturing processes from available information is described in this paper. Economic risks may stem from environmental, health, and safety liabilities; potential product losses; and other intangibles. Benefits and costs may be uncertain due to lack of information and experience within the available time and budget, or may be inherently variable in nature. Bayesian inference allows the integrated use of available numeric data, related data, summary statistics, and professional judgment. The Principle of Maximum Entropy is used as a basis for incorporation of subjective information. A Bayesian Pareto incident-size distribution is used to model size distributions for individual costs. Sensitivity analysis is used to help identify primary elements of project economic risk. Probability distributions for planning period costs, exceedance probabilities, and other risk indicators for alternative paint-stripping projects were computed and compared for an example industrial facility. The relative importance of variability and uncertainty as a function of planning-period length is probed.

Original languageEnglish
Article number7234
Pages (from-to)71-78
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Environmental Engineering
Volume123
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 1 1997

Fingerprint

Risk analysis
Process design
Economics
economics
cost
Costs
Planning
liability
health and safety
Paint
Probability distributions
Sensitivity analysis
entropy
sensitivity analysis
Entropy
manufacturing
Health
Statistics
risk-benefit analysis
planning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Civil and Structural Engineering

Cite this

Bayesian benefit-risk analysis for sustainable process design. / Englehardt, James Douglas.

In: Journal of Environmental Engineering, Vol. 123, No. 1, 7234, 01.01.1997, p. 71-78.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2e529485d5db4c09a7c96973f0b44911,
title = "Bayesian benefit-risk analysis for sustainable process design",
abstract = "A Bayesian model for assessing uncertain and variable economics of proposed environmentally conscious and other manufacturing processes from available information is described in this paper. Economic risks may stem from environmental, health, and safety liabilities; potential product losses; and other intangibles. Benefits and costs may be uncertain due to lack of information and experience within the available time and budget, or may be inherently variable in nature. Bayesian inference allows the integrated use of available numeric data, related data, summary statistics, and professional judgment. The Principle of Maximum Entropy is used as a basis for incorporation of subjective information. A Bayesian Pareto incident-size distribution is used to model size distributions for individual costs. Sensitivity analysis is used to help identify primary elements of project economic risk. Probability distributions for planning period costs, exceedance probabilities, and other risk indicators for alternative paint-stripping projects were computed and compared for an example industrial facility. The relative importance of variability and uncertainty as a function of planning-period length is probed.",
author = "Englehardt, {James Douglas}",
year = "1997",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "123",
pages = "71--78",
journal = "Journal of Environmental Engineering, ASCE",
issn = "0733-9372",
publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bayesian benefit-risk analysis for sustainable process design

AU - Englehardt, James Douglas

PY - 1997/1/1

Y1 - 1997/1/1

N2 - A Bayesian model for assessing uncertain and variable economics of proposed environmentally conscious and other manufacturing processes from available information is described in this paper. Economic risks may stem from environmental, health, and safety liabilities; potential product losses; and other intangibles. Benefits and costs may be uncertain due to lack of information and experience within the available time and budget, or may be inherently variable in nature. Bayesian inference allows the integrated use of available numeric data, related data, summary statistics, and professional judgment. The Principle of Maximum Entropy is used as a basis for incorporation of subjective information. A Bayesian Pareto incident-size distribution is used to model size distributions for individual costs. Sensitivity analysis is used to help identify primary elements of project economic risk. Probability distributions for planning period costs, exceedance probabilities, and other risk indicators for alternative paint-stripping projects were computed and compared for an example industrial facility. The relative importance of variability and uncertainty as a function of planning-period length is probed.

AB - A Bayesian model for assessing uncertain and variable economics of proposed environmentally conscious and other manufacturing processes from available information is described in this paper. Economic risks may stem from environmental, health, and safety liabilities; potential product losses; and other intangibles. Benefits and costs may be uncertain due to lack of information and experience within the available time and budget, or may be inherently variable in nature. Bayesian inference allows the integrated use of available numeric data, related data, summary statistics, and professional judgment. The Principle of Maximum Entropy is used as a basis for incorporation of subjective information. A Bayesian Pareto incident-size distribution is used to model size distributions for individual costs. Sensitivity analysis is used to help identify primary elements of project economic risk. Probability distributions for planning period costs, exceedance probabilities, and other risk indicators for alternative paint-stripping projects were computed and compared for an example industrial facility. The relative importance of variability and uncertainty as a function of planning-period length is probed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0005862325&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0005862325&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0005862325

VL - 123

SP - 71

EP - 78

JO - Journal of Environmental Engineering, ASCE

JF - Journal of Environmental Engineering, ASCE

SN - 0733-9372

IS - 1

M1 - 7234

ER -