Aspectos básicos de la vigilancia en salud pública para los años noventa.

Translated title of the contribution: Basic aspects of public health surveillance for the 90s

J. Sepúlveda, M. López-Cervantes, Julio Frenk, J. Gómez de León, M. A. Lezana-Fernández, C. Santos-Burgoa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper we propose a wider scope for public health surveillance in order to incorporate demographic and health systems monitoring along with activities conventionally associated with epidemiologic surveillance. This new conception stems, in turn, from a revised definition of public health, which describes--not a sector of activity or a type of health service--but a level of aggregation based on the population at large. In our review of the ideas that lead to the institutionalization of health surveillance, we stress the broad concepts developed by such pioneers as Graunt and Petty. Their original concepts emerged from their active concerns for the public's health at a time when no scientific theory of contagion was available--let alone any knowledge about how to treat persons for the major diseases that affected them. Later on, and largely as the result of impressive advances in biomedical knowledge, surveillance activities tended to specialize and to concentrate predominantly on disease outbreaks and on salient adverse health conditions. Health surveillance became closely associated with epidemiologic surveillance, which in turn became associated with the ability to respond promptly to adverse health outcomes. Recently, we have witnessed a gradual broadening of both the concepts and the practice of health surveillance. Paradoxically, the newer proposals tend to recapture part of the spirit and scope of earlier definitions, prompted perhaps by such thoughtful historic parallels as the newly emerging health problems for which we have no clear-cut solution. If one element has to be stressed to promote the objectives of health surveillance today, it is the need to anticipate health outcomes and not just respond to them. This, in turn, requires an increased attention to the surveillance of risk factors, and a greater understanding of the complex causal relationships that those factors--including behavioral, lifestyle, and environmental ones--with adverse health outcomes and disability. Needless to say that, the first and foremost aim of health care--and of modern surveillance--is to promote the well-being of individuals by improving their health.

Original languageSpanish
Pages (from-to)70-82
Number of pages13
JournalSalud Publica de Mexico
Volume36
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 1994
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Public Health Surveillance
Health
Epidemiological Monitoring
Public Health
Institutionalization
Aptitude
Health Services
Disease Outbreaks
Life Style

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Sepúlveda, J., López-Cervantes, M., Frenk, J., Gómez de León, J., Lezana-Fernández, M. A., & Santos-Burgoa, C. (1994). Aspectos básicos de la vigilancia en salud pública para los años noventa. Salud Publica de Mexico, 36(1), 70-82.

Aspectos básicos de la vigilancia en salud pública para los años noventa. / Sepúlveda, J.; López-Cervantes, M.; Frenk, Julio; Gómez de León, J.; Lezana-Fernández, M. A.; Santos-Burgoa, C.

In: Salud Publica de Mexico, Vol. 36, No. 1, 01.1994, p. 70-82.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sepúlveda, J, López-Cervantes, M, Frenk, J, Gómez de León, J, Lezana-Fernández, MA & Santos-Burgoa, C 1994, 'Aspectos básicos de la vigilancia en salud pública para los años noventa.', Salud Publica de Mexico, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 70-82.
Sepúlveda J, López-Cervantes M, Frenk J, Gómez de León J, Lezana-Fernández MA, Santos-Burgoa C. Aspectos básicos de la vigilancia en salud pública para los años noventa. Salud Publica de Mexico. 1994 Jan;36(1):70-82.
Sepúlveda, J. ; López-Cervantes, M. ; Frenk, Julio ; Gómez de León, J. ; Lezana-Fernández, M. A. ; Santos-Burgoa, C. / Aspectos básicos de la vigilancia en salud pública para los años noventa. In: Salud Publica de Mexico. 1994 ; Vol. 36, No. 1. pp. 70-82.
@article{e0ee2b21e4a74e01a7c279b8cc6413f2,
title = "Aspectos b{\'a}sicos de la vigilancia en salud p{\'u}blica para los a{\~n}os noventa.",
abstract = "In this paper we propose a wider scope for public health surveillance in order to incorporate demographic and health systems monitoring along with activities conventionally associated with epidemiologic surveillance. This new conception stems, in turn, from a revised definition of public health, which describes--not a sector of activity or a type of health service--but a level of aggregation based on the population at large. In our review of the ideas that lead to the institutionalization of health surveillance, we stress the broad concepts developed by such pioneers as Graunt and Petty. Their original concepts emerged from their active concerns for the public's health at a time when no scientific theory of contagion was available--let alone any knowledge about how to treat persons for the major diseases that affected them. Later on, and largely as the result of impressive advances in biomedical knowledge, surveillance activities tended to specialize and to concentrate predominantly on disease outbreaks and on salient adverse health conditions. Health surveillance became closely associated with epidemiologic surveillance, which in turn became associated with the ability to respond promptly to adverse health outcomes. Recently, we have witnessed a gradual broadening of both the concepts and the practice of health surveillance. Paradoxically, the newer proposals tend to recapture part of the spirit and scope of earlier definitions, prompted perhaps by such thoughtful historic parallels as the newly emerging health problems for which we have no clear-cut solution. If one element has to be stressed to promote the objectives of health surveillance today, it is the need to anticipate health outcomes and not just respond to them. This, in turn, requires an increased attention to the surveillance of risk factors, and a greater understanding of the complex causal relationships that those factors--including behavioral, lifestyle, and environmental ones--with adverse health outcomes and disability. Needless to say that, the first and foremost aim of health care--and of modern surveillance--is to promote the well-being of individuals by improving their health.",
author = "J. Sep{\'u}lveda and M. L{\'o}pez-Cervantes and Julio Frenk and {G{\'o}mez de Le{\'o}n}, J. and Lezana-Fern{\'a}ndez, {M. A.} and C. Santos-Burgoa",
year = "1994",
month = "1",
language = "Spanish",
volume = "36",
pages = "70--82",
journal = "Salud Publica de Mexico",
issn = "0036-3634",
publisher = "Instituto Nacional de Salud Publica",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Aspectos básicos de la vigilancia en salud pública para los años noventa.

AU - Sepúlveda, J.

AU - López-Cervantes, M.

AU - Frenk, Julio

AU - Gómez de León, J.

AU - Lezana-Fernández, M. A.

AU - Santos-Burgoa, C.

PY - 1994/1

Y1 - 1994/1

N2 - In this paper we propose a wider scope for public health surveillance in order to incorporate demographic and health systems monitoring along with activities conventionally associated with epidemiologic surveillance. This new conception stems, in turn, from a revised definition of public health, which describes--not a sector of activity or a type of health service--but a level of aggregation based on the population at large. In our review of the ideas that lead to the institutionalization of health surveillance, we stress the broad concepts developed by such pioneers as Graunt and Petty. Their original concepts emerged from their active concerns for the public's health at a time when no scientific theory of contagion was available--let alone any knowledge about how to treat persons for the major diseases that affected them. Later on, and largely as the result of impressive advances in biomedical knowledge, surveillance activities tended to specialize and to concentrate predominantly on disease outbreaks and on salient adverse health conditions. Health surveillance became closely associated with epidemiologic surveillance, which in turn became associated with the ability to respond promptly to adverse health outcomes. Recently, we have witnessed a gradual broadening of both the concepts and the practice of health surveillance. Paradoxically, the newer proposals tend to recapture part of the spirit and scope of earlier definitions, prompted perhaps by such thoughtful historic parallels as the newly emerging health problems for which we have no clear-cut solution. If one element has to be stressed to promote the objectives of health surveillance today, it is the need to anticipate health outcomes and not just respond to them. This, in turn, requires an increased attention to the surveillance of risk factors, and a greater understanding of the complex causal relationships that those factors--including behavioral, lifestyle, and environmental ones--with adverse health outcomes and disability. Needless to say that, the first and foremost aim of health care--and of modern surveillance--is to promote the well-being of individuals by improving their health.

AB - In this paper we propose a wider scope for public health surveillance in order to incorporate demographic and health systems monitoring along with activities conventionally associated with epidemiologic surveillance. This new conception stems, in turn, from a revised definition of public health, which describes--not a sector of activity or a type of health service--but a level of aggregation based on the population at large. In our review of the ideas that lead to the institutionalization of health surveillance, we stress the broad concepts developed by such pioneers as Graunt and Petty. Their original concepts emerged from their active concerns for the public's health at a time when no scientific theory of contagion was available--let alone any knowledge about how to treat persons for the major diseases that affected them. Later on, and largely as the result of impressive advances in biomedical knowledge, surveillance activities tended to specialize and to concentrate predominantly on disease outbreaks and on salient adverse health conditions. Health surveillance became closely associated with epidemiologic surveillance, which in turn became associated with the ability to respond promptly to adverse health outcomes. Recently, we have witnessed a gradual broadening of both the concepts and the practice of health surveillance. Paradoxically, the newer proposals tend to recapture part of the spirit and scope of earlier definitions, prompted perhaps by such thoughtful historic parallels as the newly emerging health problems for which we have no clear-cut solution. If one element has to be stressed to promote the objectives of health surveillance today, it is the need to anticipate health outcomes and not just respond to them. This, in turn, requires an increased attention to the surveillance of risk factors, and a greater understanding of the complex causal relationships that those factors--including behavioral, lifestyle, and environmental ones--with adverse health outcomes and disability. Needless to say that, the first and foremost aim of health care--and of modern surveillance--is to promote the well-being of individuals by improving their health.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028253390&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028253390&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 70

EP - 82

JO - Salud Publica de Mexico

JF - Salud Publica de Mexico

SN - 0036-3634

IS - 1

ER -