Backorder penalty cost coefficient "b": What could it be?

George Liberopoulos, Isidoros Tsikis, Stefanos Delikouras

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The classical economic order quantity (EOQ) model with planned penalized backorders (PB) relies on postulating a value for the backorder penalty cost coefficient, b, which is supposed to reflect the intangible adverse effect of the future loss of customer goodwill following a stockout. Recognizing that the effect of the future loss of customer goodwill should be not a direct penalty cost but a change in future demand, Schwartz [1966. A new approach to stockout penalties. Management Science 12(12), B538-B544] modified the classical EOQ-PB model by eliminating the backorder penalty cost term from the objective function and assuming that the long-run demand rate is a decreasing, strictly convex function of the customer's "disappointment factor" (defined as the complement of the demand fill rate) following a stockout, which in turn is an increasing, strictly convex function of the demand fill rate. He called the new model a perturbed demand (PD) model. Schwartz provided convincing justification for his PD model and presented several variations of it in a follow-up paper, but he did not solve any of these models. In this paper, we solve Schwartz's original PD model and its variations, and we discuss the implications of their solutions, thus filling a gap in the literature left by Schwartz. Moreover, having been convinced that Schwartz's approach is more valid than the classical approach for representing the effect of the loss of customer goodwill following a stockout, but also recognizing that the classical approach is far more popular than the PD approach, because of its simplicity and because of tradition, we use the solution of the PD model to infer the value of b in the classical model, thus providing one possible answer to the question, what could b be? A noteworthy implication of the solution of Schwartz's original PD model is that the optimal fill rate is always 0 or 1, rendering the inferred value of b in the classical model 0 or ∞, respectively. Suspecting that the property of the PD function which is most likely responsible for producing this "bang-bang" type of result is strict convexity, we show that for the case where the PD function is proportional to an integer power, say n, of the fill rate, the optimal fill rate is always 0 or 1, if and only if n>1, in which case the PD function is strictly convex in the fill rate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)166-178
Number of pages13
JournalInternational Journal of Production Economics
Volume123
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Costs
Backorder
Penalty
Coefficients
Management science
Economics
Demand model
Stockout
Goodwill
Demand function
Classical economics
Economic order quantity

Keywords

  • Backorders
  • Economic order quantity
  • Perturbed demand
  • Stockout

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

Cite this

Backorder penalty cost coefficient "b" : What could it be? / Liberopoulos, George; Tsikis, Isidoros; Delikouras, Stefanos.

In: International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 123, No. 1, 01.01.2010, p. 166-178.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Liberopoulos, George ; Tsikis, Isidoros ; Delikouras, Stefanos. / Backorder penalty cost coefficient "b" : What could it be?. In: International Journal of Production Economics. 2010 ; Vol. 123, No. 1. pp. 166-178.
@article{d6886e7ff2744e409efef478f17cf707,
title = "Backorder penalty cost coefficient {"}b{"}: What could it be?",
abstract = "The classical economic order quantity (EOQ) model with planned penalized backorders (PB) relies on postulating a value for the backorder penalty cost coefficient, b, which is supposed to reflect the intangible adverse effect of the future loss of customer goodwill following a stockout. Recognizing that the effect of the future loss of customer goodwill should be not a direct penalty cost but a change in future demand, Schwartz [1966. A new approach to stockout penalties. Management Science 12(12), B538-B544] modified the classical EOQ-PB model by eliminating the backorder penalty cost term from the objective function and assuming that the long-run demand rate is a decreasing, strictly convex function of the customer's {"}disappointment factor{"} (defined as the complement of the demand fill rate) following a stockout, which in turn is an increasing, strictly convex function of the demand fill rate. He called the new model a perturbed demand (PD) model. Schwartz provided convincing justification for his PD model and presented several variations of it in a follow-up paper, but he did not solve any of these models. In this paper, we solve Schwartz's original PD model and its variations, and we discuss the implications of their solutions, thus filling a gap in the literature left by Schwartz. Moreover, having been convinced that Schwartz's approach is more valid than the classical approach for representing the effect of the loss of customer goodwill following a stockout, but also recognizing that the classical approach is far more popular than the PD approach, because of its simplicity and because of tradition, we use the solution of the PD model to infer the value of b in the classical model, thus providing one possible answer to the question, what could b be? A noteworthy implication of the solution of Schwartz's original PD model is that the optimal fill rate is always 0 or 1, rendering the inferred value of b in the classical model 0 or ∞, respectively. Suspecting that the property of the PD function which is most likely responsible for producing this {"}bang-bang{"} type of result is strict convexity, we show that for the case where the PD function is proportional to an integer power, say n, of the fill rate, the optimal fill rate is always 0 or 1, if and only if n>1, in which case the PD function is strictly convex in the fill rate.",
keywords = "Backorders, Economic order quantity, Perturbed demand, Stockout",
author = "George Liberopoulos and Isidoros Tsikis and Stefanos Delikouras",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.07.015",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "123",
pages = "166--178",
journal = "International Journal of Production Economics",
issn = "0925-5273",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Backorder penalty cost coefficient "b"

T2 - What could it be?

AU - Liberopoulos, George

AU - Tsikis, Isidoros

AU - Delikouras, Stefanos

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - The classical economic order quantity (EOQ) model with planned penalized backorders (PB) relies on postulating a value for the backorder penalty cost coefficient, b, which is supposed to reflect the intangible adverse effect of the future loss of customer goodwill following a stockout. Recognizing that the effect of the future loss of customer goodwill should be not a direct penalty cost but a change in future demand, Schwartz [1966. A new approach to stockout penalties. Management Science 12(12), B538-B544] modified the classical EOQ-PB model by eliminating the backorder penalty cost term from the objective function and assuming that the long-run demand rate is a decreasing, strictly convex function of the customer's "disappointment factor" (defined as the complement of the demand fill rate) following a stockout, which in turn is an increasing, strictly convex function of the demand fill rate. He called the new model a perturbed demand (PD) model. Schwartz provided convincing justification for his PD model and presented several variations of it in a follow-up paper, but he did not solve any of these models. In this paper, we solve Schwartz's original PD model and its variations, and we discuss the implications of their solutions, thus filling a gap in the literature left by Schwartz. Moreover, having been convinced that Schwartz's approach is more valid than the classical approach for representing the effect of the loss of customer goodwill following a stockout, but also recognizing that the classical approach is far more popular than the PD approach, because of its simplicity and because of tradition, we use the solution of the PD model to infer the value of b in the classical model, thus providing one possible answer to the question, what could b be? A noteworthy implication of the solution of Schwartz's original PD model is that the optimal fill rate is always 0 or 1, rendering the inferred value of b in the classical model 0 or ∞, respectively. Suspecting that the property of the PD function which is most likely responsible for producing this "bang-bang" type of result is strict convexity, we show that for the case where the PD function is proportional to an integer power, say n, of the fill rate, the optimal fill rate is always 0 or 1, if and only if n>1, in which case the PD function is strictly convex in the fill rate.

AB - The classical economic order quantity (EOQ) model with planned penalized backorders (PB) relies on postulating a value for the backorder penalty cost coefficient, b, which is supposed to reflect the intangible adverse effect of the future loss of customer goodwill following a stockout. Recognizing that the effect of the future loss of customer goodwill should be not a direct penalty cost but a change in future demand, Schwartz [1966. A new approach to stockout penalties. Management Science 12(12), B538-B544] modified the classical EOQ-PB model by eliminating the backorder penalty cost term from the objective function and assuming that the long-run demand rate is a decreasing, strictly convex function of the customer's "disappointment factor" (defined as the complement of the demand fill rate) following a stockout, which in turn is an increasing, strictly convex function of the demand fill rate. He called the new model a perturbed demand (PD) model. Schwartz provided convincing justification for his PD model and presented several variations of it in a follow-up paper, but he did not solve any of these models. In this paper, we solve Schwartz's original PD model and its variations, and we discuss the implications of their solutions, thus filling a gap in the literature left by Schwartz. Moreover, having been convinced that Schwartz's approach is more valid than the classical approach for representing the effect of the loss of customer goodwill following a stockout, but also recognizing that the classical approach is far more popular than the PD approach, because of its simplicity and because of tradition, we use the solution of the PD model to infer the value of b in the classical model, thus providing one possible answer to the question, what could b be? A noteworthy implication of the solution of Schwartz's original PD model is that the optimal fill rate is always 0 or 1, rendering the inferred value of b in the classical model 0 or ∞, respectively. Suspecting that the property of the PD function which is most likely responsible for producing this "bang-bang" type of result is strict convexity, we show that for the case where the PD function is proportional to an integer power, say n, of the fill rate, the optimal fill rate is always 0 or 1, if and only if n>1, in which case the PD function is strictly convex in the fill rate.

KW - Backorders

KW - Economic order quantity

KW - Perturbed demand

KW - Stockout

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70449529627&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70449529627&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.07.015

DO - 10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.07.015

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:70449529627

VL - 123

SP - 166

EP - 178

JO - International Journal of Production Economics

JF - International Journal of Production Economics

SN - 0925-5273

IS - 1

ER -