Attribution of success as a function of locus of control and objective self-awareness

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Several studies have failed to validate Rotter’s IE control of reinforcement construct through the attribution of ambiguously caused successes by Internals and Externals. The present study was another attempt to validate the construct using a new locus of control measure. Additionally, two predictions derived from self-awareness theory were tested. Attributions were made as estimated influences of four causal categories, and as a global partition of responsibility into internal vs. external factors. Internals and Externals differed only on attribution to chance. On the global measure, self-awareness produced more internality among Externals and an opposite tendency among Internals. Two possible interpretations of this result were discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)358-360
Number of pages3
JournalBulletin of the Psychonomic Society
Volume7
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1976

Fingerprint

Reinforcement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Catalysis
  • Chemistry(all)

Cite this

Attribution of success as a function of locus of control and objective self-awareness. / Carver, Charles S.

In: Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, Vol. 7, No. 4, 1976, p. 358-360.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3f3e3abc0943434d9202dbd703bb9952,
title = "Attribution of success as a function of locus of control and objective self-awareness",
abstract = "Several studies have failed to validate Rotter’s IE control of reinforcement construct through the attribution of ambiguously caused successes by Internals and Externals. The present study was another attempt to validate the construct using a new locus of control measure. Additionally, two predictions derived from self-awareness theory were tested. Attributions were made as estimated influences of four causal categories, and as a global partition of responsibility into internal vs. external factors. Internals and Externals differed only on attribution to chance. On the global measure, self-awareness produced more internality among Externals and an opposite tendency among Internals. Two possible interpretations of this result were discussed.",
author = "Carver, {Charles S}",
year = "1976",
doi = "10.3758/BF03337215",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "358--360",
journal = "Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society",
issn = "0090-5054",
publisher = "Psychonomic Society Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attribution of success as a function of locus of control and objective self-awareness

AU - Carver, Charles S

PY - 1976

Y1 - 1976

N2 - Several studies have failed to validate Rotter’s IE control of reinforcement construct through the attribution of ambiguously caused successes by Internals and Externals. The present study was another attempt to validate the construct using a new locus of control measure. Additionally, two predictions derived from self-awareness theory were tested. Attributions were made as estimated influences of four causal categories, and as a global partition of responsibility into internal vs. external factors. Internals and Externals differed only on attribution to chance. On the global measure, self-awareness produced more internality among Externals and an opposite tendency among Internals. Two possible interpretations of this result were discussed.

AB - Several studies have failed to validate Rotter’s IE control of reinforcement construct through the attribution of ambiguously caused successes by Internals and Externals. The present study was another attempt to validate the construct using a new locus of control measure. Additionally, two predictions derived from self-awareness theory were tested. Attributions were made as estimated influences of four causal categories, and as a global partition of responsibility into internal vs. external factors. Internals and Externals differed only on attribution to chance. On the global measure, self-awareness produced more internality among Externals and an opposite tendency among Internals. Two possible interpretations of this result were discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0002006618&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0002006618&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/BF03337215

DO - 10.3758/BF03337215

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 358

EP - 360

JO - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society

JF - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society

SN - 0090-5054

IS - 4

ER -