Assumptions and Consequences of Treating Providers in Therapy Studies as Fixed Versus Random Effects

Reply to Crits-Christoph, Tu, and Gallop (2003) and Serlin, Wampold, and Levin (2003)

Matthias Siemer, Jutta Joormann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In their comments on the authors' article (M. Siemer & J. Joormann, 2003), R. C. Serlin, B. E. Wampold, and J. R. Levin (2003) and P. Crits-Christoph, X. Tu, and R. Gallop (2003) took issue with the authors' suggestion to evaluate therapy studies with nested providers with a fixed model approach. In this reply, the authors comment on Serlin et al.'s critique by showing that their arguments do not apply, are based on misconceptions about the purpose and nature of statistical inference, or are based on flawed reasoning. The authors also comment on Crits-Christoph et al.'s critique by showing that the proposed approach is very similar to, but less inclusive than, their own suggestion.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)535-544
Number of pages10
JournalPsychological Methods
Volume8
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2003

Fingerprint

Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

@article{0aaf25a3172242d18293df578fd9302e,
title = "Assumptions and Consequences of Treating Providers in Therapy Studies as Fixed Versus Random Effects: Reply to Crits-Christoph, Tu, and Gallop (2003) and Serlin, Wampold, and Levin (2003)",
abstract = "In their comments on the authors' article (M. Siemer & J. Joormann, 2003), R. C. Serlin, B. E. Wampold, and J. R. Levin (2003) and P. Crits-Christoph, X. Tu, and R. Gallop (2003) took issue with the authors' suggestion to evaluate therapy studies with nested providers with a fixed model approach. In this reply, the authors comment on Serlin et al.'s critique by showing that their arguments do not apply, are based on misconceptions about the purpose and nature of statistical inference, or are based on flawed reasoning. The authors also comment on Crits-Christoph et al.'s critique by showing that the proposed approach is very similar to, but less inclusive than, their own suggestion.",
author = "Matthias Siemer and Jutta Joormann",
year = "2003",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/1082-989X.8.4.535",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "535--544",
journal = "Psychological Methods",
issn = "1082-989X",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assumptions and Consequences of Treating Providers in Therapy Studies as Fixed Versus Random Effects

T2 - Reply to Crits-Christoph, Tu, and Gallop (2003) and Serlin, Wampold, and Levin (2003)

AU - Siemer, Matthias

AU - Joormann, Jutta

PY - 2003/12/1

Y1 - 2003/12/1

N2 - In their comments on the authors' article (M. Siemer & J. Joormann, 2003), R. C. Serlin, B. E. Wampold, and J. R. Levin (2003) and P. Crits-Christoph, X. Tu, and R. Gallop (2003) took issue with the authors' suggestion to evaluate therapy studies with nested providers with a fixed model approach. In this reply, the authors comment on Serlin et al.'s critique by showing that their arguments do not apply, are based on misconceptions about the purpose and nature of statistical inference, or are based on flawed reasoning. The authors also comment on Crits-Christoph et al.'s critique by showing that the proposed approach is very similar to, but less inclusive than, their own suggestion.

AB - In their comments on the authors' article (M. Siemer & J. Joormann, 2003), R. C. Serlin, B. E. Wampold, and J. R. Levin (2003) and P. Crits-Christoph, X. Tu, and R. Gallop (2003) took issue with the authors' suggestion to evaluate therapy studies with nested providers with a fixed model approach. In this reply, the authors comment on Serlin et al.'s critique by showing that their arguments do not apply, are based on misconceptions about the purpose and nature of statistical inference, or are based on flawed reasoning. The authors also comment on Crits-Christoph et al.'s critique by showing that the proposed approach is very similar to, but less inclusive than, their own suggestion.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0347062733&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0347062733&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/1082-989X.8.4.535

DO - 10.1037/1082-989X.8.4.535

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 535

EP - 544

JO - Psychological Methods

JF - Psychological Methods

SN - 1082-989X

IS - 4

ER -