TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessment of moisture content in sandy beach environments from multispectral satellite imagery
AU - Paprocki, Julie
AU - Stark, Nina
AU - Graber, Hans C.
AU - Wadman, Heidi
AU - McNinch, Jesse E.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors acknowledge funding from the Office of Naval Research (ONR) through grants N00014-17-1-2516 and N00014-18-2435. The authors would also like to thank the technical staff of the USACE-FRF in Duck; the City and Borough of Yakutat; Joe Dove and Valerie Thomas of Virginia Tech for support with the ASD FieldSpec; and Dennis Kiptoo, Chris McBride, Ali Albatal, Cagdas Bilici, Nick Brilli, and the 2018 Yakutat field team for assistance with field measurements. The authors would also like to thank two anonymous reviewers and the associate editor for comments that benefitted the improvement of this article.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, Canadian Science Publishing. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - A framework for estimating moisture content from satellite-based multispectral imagery of sandy beaches was tested under various site conditions and sensors. It utilizes the reflectance of dry soil and an empirical factor c relating reflectance and moisture content for a specific sediment. Here, c was derived two ways: first, from in situ measurements of moisture content and average NIR image reflectance; and second, from laboratory-based measurements of moisture content and spectrometer reflectance. The proposed method was tested at four sandy beaches: Duck, North Carolina; and Cannon Beach, Ocean Cape, and Point Carrew, Yakutat, Alaska. Both measured and estimated moisture content profiles were impacted by site geomorphology. For profiles with uniform slopes, moisture contents ranged from 3.0% to 8.0% (zone 1) and from 8.0% to 23.0% (zone 2). Compared to field measurements, the moisture contents estimated using c calibrated from in situ and laboratory data resulted in percent error of 3.6%–44.7% and 2.7%–58.6%, respectively. The highest percent error occurred at the transition from zone 1 to zone 2. Generally, moisture contents were overestimated in zone 1 and underestimated in zone 2, but followed the expected trends based on field measurements. When estimated moisture contents in zone 1 exceeded 10%, surface roughness, debris, geomorphology, and weather conditions were considered.
AB - A framework for estimating moisture content from satellite-based multispectral imagery of sandy beaches was tested under various site conditions and sensors. It utilizes the reflectance of dry soil and an empirical factor c relating reflectance and moisture content for a specific sediment. Here, c was derived two ways: first, from in situ measurements of moisture content and average NIR image reflectance; and second, from laboratory-based measurements of moisture content and spectrometer reflectance. The proposed method was tested at four sandy beaches: Duck, North Carolina; and Cannon Beach, Ocean Cape, and Point Carrew, Yakutat, Alaska. Both measured and estimated moisture content profiles were impacted by site geomorphology. For profiles with uniform slopes, moisture contents ranged from 3.0% to 8.0% (zone 1) and from 8.0% to 23.0% (zone 2). Compared to field measurements, the moisture contents estimated using c calibrated from in situ and laboratory data resulted in percent error of 3.6%–44.7% and 2.7%–58.6%, respectively. The highest percent error occurred at the transition from zone 1 to zone 2. Generally, moisture contents were overestimated in zone 1 and underestimated in zone 2, but followed the expected trends based on field measurements. When estimated moisture contents in zone 1 exceeded 10%, surface roughness, debris, geomorphology, and weather conditions were considered.
KW - Moisture content
KW - Multispectral image
KW - Sandy beach
KW - Spectrometer
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85121995889&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85121995889&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1139/cgj-2020-0624
DO - 10.1139/cgj-2020-0624
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85121995889
VL - 59
SP - 225
EP - 238
JO - Canadian Geotechnical Journal
JF - Canadian Geotechnical Journal
SN - 0008-3674
IS - 2
ER -