Assessing the reliability and validity of anti-tobacco attitudes/beliefs in the context of a campaign strategy

Kristopher Arheart, David F. Sly, Edward J. Trapido, Richard D. Rodriguez, Amy J. Ellestad

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives. To identify multi-item attitude/belief scales associated with the theoretical foundations of an anti-tobacco counter-marketing campaign and assess their reliability and validity. Methods. The data analyzed are from two state-wide, random, cross-sectional telephone surveys [n(S1)=1,079, n(S2)=1,150]. Items forming attitude/belief scales are identified using factor analysis. Reliability is assessed with Chronbach's alpha. Relationships among scales are explored using Pearson correlation. Validity is assessed by testing associations derived from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) logic model for tobacco control program development and evaluation linking media exposure to attitudes/beliefs, and attitudes/beliefs to smoking-related behaviors. Adjusted odds ratios are employed for these analyses. Results. Three factors emerged: traditional attitudes/beliefs about tobacco and tobacco use, tobacco industry manipulation and anti-tobacco empowerment. Reliability coefficients are in the range of 0.70 and vary little between age groups. The factors are correlated with one-another as hypothesized. Associations between media exposure and the attitude/belief scales and between these scales and behaviors are consistent with the CDC logic model. Conclusions. Using reliable, valid multi-item scales is theoretically and methodologically more sound than employing single-item measures of attitudes/beliefs. Methodological, theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)909-918
Number of pages10
JournalPreventive Medicine
Volume39
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2004

Fingerprint

Reproducibility of Results
Tobacco
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.)
Tobacco Industry
Program Development
Program Evaluation
Tobacco Use
Marketing
Telephone
Statistical Factor Analysis
Age Groups
Cross-Sectional Studies
Smoking
Odds Ratio

Keywords

  • Attitudes/beliefs
  • Mass media
  • Tobacco control
  • Youth prevention

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Assessing the reliability and validity of anti-tobacco attitudes/beliefs in the context of a campaign strategy. / Arheart, Kristopher; Sly, David F.; Trapido, Edward J.; Rodriguez, Richard D.; Ellestad, Amy J.

In: Preventive Medicine, Vol. 39, No. 5, 01.11.2004, p. 909-918.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Arheart, Kristopher ; Sly, David F. ; Trapido, Edward J. ; Rodriguez, Richard D. ; Ellestad, Amy J. / Assessing the reliability and validity of anti-tobacco attitudes/beliefs in the context of a campaign strategy. In: Preventive Medicine. 2004 ; Vol. 39, No. 5. pp. 909-918.
@article{7b8c22254f8c4e029f003ea8c2bd599e,
title = "Assessing the reliability and validity of anti-tobacco attitudes/beliefs in the context of a campaign strategy",
abstract = "Objectives. To identify multi-item attitude/belief scales associated with the theoretical foundations of an anti-tobacco counter-marketing campaign and assess their reliability and validity. Methods. The data analyzed are from two state-wide, random, cross-sectional telephone surveys [n(S1)=1,079, n(S2)=1,150]. Items forming attitude/belief scales are identified using factor analysis. Reliability is assessed with Chronbach's alpha. Relationships among scales are explored using Pearson correlation. Validity is assessed by testing associations derived from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) logic model for tobacco control program development and evaluation linking media exposure to attitudes/beliefs, and attitudes/beliefs to smoking-related behaviors. Adjusted odds ratios are employed for these analyses. Results. Three factors emerged: traditional attitudes/beliefs about tobacco and tobacco use, tobacco industry manipulation and anti-tobacco empowerment. Reliability coefficients are in the range of 0.70 and vary little between age groups. The factors are correlated with one-another as hypothesized. Associations between media exposure and the attitude/belief scales and between these scales and behaviors are consistent with the CDC logic model. Conclusions. Using reliable, valid multi-item scales is theoretically and methodologically more sound than employing single-item measures of attitudes/beliefs. Methodological, theoretical and practical implications are discussed.",
keywords = "Attitudes/beliefs, Mass media, Tobacco control, Youth prevention",
author = "Kristopher Arheart and Sly, {David F.} and Trapido, {Edward J.} and Rodriguez, {Richard D.} and Ellestad, {Amy J.}",
year = "2004",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.03.028",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "909--918",
journal = "Preventive Medicine",
issn = "0091-7435",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing the reliability and validity of anti-tobacco attitudes/beliefs in the context of a campaign strategy

AU - Arheart, Kristopher

AU - Sly, David F.

AU - Trapido, Edward J.

AU - Rodriguez, Richard D.

AU - Ellestad, Amy J.

PY - 2004/11/1

Y1 - 2004/11/1

N2 - Objectives. To identify multi-item attitude/belief scales associated with the theoretical foundations of an anti-tobacco counter-marketing campaign and assess their reliability and validity. Methods. The data analyzed are from two state-wide, random, cross-sectional telephone surveys [n(S1)=1,079, n(S2)=1,150]. Items forming attitude/belief scales are identified using factor analysis. Reliability is assessed with Chronbach's alpha. Relationships among scales are explored using Pearson correlation. Validity is assessed by testing associations derived from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) logic model for tobacco control program development and evaluation linking media exposure to attitudes/beliefs, and attitudes/beliefs to smoking-related behaviors. Adjusted odds ratios are employed for these analyses. Results. Three factors emerged: traditional attitudes/beliefs about tobacco and tobacco use, tobacco industry manipulation and anti-tobacco empowerment. Reliability coefficients are in the range of 0.70 and vary little between age groups. The factors are correlated with one-another as hypothesized. Associations between media exposure and the attitude/belief scales and between these scales and behaviors are consistent with the CDC logic model. Conclusions. Using reliable, valid multi-item scales is theoretically and methodologically more sound than employing single-item measures of attitudes/beliefs. Methodological, theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

AB - Objectives. To identify multi-item attitude/belief scales associated with the theoretical foundations of an anti-tobacco counter-marketing campaign and assess their reliability and validity. Methods. The data analyzed are from two state-wide, random, cross-sectional telephone surveys [n(S1)=1,079, n(S2)=1,150]. Items forming attitude/belief scales are identified using factor analysis. Reliability is assessed with Chronbach's alpha. Relationships among scales are explored using Pearson correlation. Validity is assessed by testing associations derived from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) logic model for tobacco control program development and evaluation linking media exposure to attitudes/beliefs, and attitudes/beliefs to smoking-related behaviors. Adjusted odds ratios are employed for these analyses. Results. Three factors emerged: traditional attitudes/beliefs about tobacco and tobacco use, tobacco industry manipulation and anti-tobacco empowerment. Reliability coefficients are in the range of 0.70 and vary little between age groups. The factors are correlated with one-another as hypothesized. Associations between media exposure and the attitude/belief scales and between these scales and behaviors are consistent with the CDC logic model. Conclusions. Using reliable, valid multi-item scales is theoretically and methodologically more sound than employing single-item measures of attitudes/beliefs. Methodological, theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

KW - Attitudes/beliefs

KW - Mass media

KW - Tobacco control

KW - Youth prevention

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4744359029&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4744359029&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.03.028

DO - 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.03.028

M3 - Article

C2 - 15475023

AN - SCOPUS:4744359029

VL - 39

SP - 909

EP - 918

JO - Preventive Medicine

JF - Preventive Medicine

SN - 0091-7435

IS - 5

ER -